Category Archives: Refuting Islam

Jesus in the Old Testament

Muslims insist there is no mention of Jesus in the Old Testament. If anything they claim all the mention of Jesus is really mentioning Muhammad, which is even more bizarre. So if you think there’s no mention of Jesus in the Old Testament, read this:

Jesus in the Old Testament
There is no finer teacher on whether Jesus is to be found in the pages of the Old Testament than the teaching of our Lord Jesus himself.

He it was who said in John 5:39, “You [Jewish people] diligently study the Scriptures [which at that time were the 39 books of the Tanak/Old Testament]…. These are the Scriptures that tes- tify about me.” That should settle the question.

But even more famously, Jesus rebuked Cleopas, and that other unnamed disciple, as they walked along the road to Emmaus on that first Easter Sunday, “How foolish you are, and how slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken! Did not Christ have to suffer these things and then enter his glory? And beginning with Moses and all the prophets, [Jesus] explained to them what was said in all the [Old Testament] Scriptures concerning himself” (Luke 24:25-27).

Even King David predicted the resurrection of Jesus back in 1000 B.C. as he, too, saw what was ahead, namely, that Jesus would not be “abandon[ed] … to the grave, nor [would he] let his Holy One see decay” (Ps 16:8-11; Acts 2:30- 31). Therefore, it is not unexpected that we, too, should find Jesus present in the events and the predictions found in the Old Testament.

It is only right that we should find that Jesus was both actually present in the Old Testament

and accurately predicted, and that he would come first as our Savior, and then in a later sec- ond coming, would appear as the King supreme over all the earth. Such an unusual state of affairs is possible because he was, he is and he is the One to come. But sad to say, all too many miss both his real presence in the Old Testament narrative and the numerous predictions of both his first and second advents/comings. To remedy this, let us turn first to those places where he appeared in a Christophany in the Old Testament times. Then we will sample some of the numer- ous predictions of his comings.

Old Testament Appearances of Christ

Jesus is first seen in the Old Testament as the person who appeared as “the Angel of the Lord” in his sudden confrontation with Sarah’s maidservant, Hagar (Gen 16:7). Thereafter, he continued to appear intermittently throughout the earlier books of the Old Testament. These real occurences, initiated by God, were characterized by the fact that they were convincing revelations of his person and work, as much as they were also

transitory, fleeting, but audible and clearly visible appear- ances. He came temporally in the form of a human, much before his final incarnation as a babe in Bethlehem, yet this same “Angel of the LORD” is called and is addressed often as “the LORD/Yahweh” himself (Gen 12:7; 17:1; 19:1; etc.).

This “Angel of the LORD” was a title that stood for his office, but it did not describe his nature. The Hebrew word for “angel” (mal’ak) had the basic idea of one who was “sent,” a “messenger.” Of the 214 usages of the He- brew term used for “angel,” about one-third of them refer to what is labeled by theologians as a “Christophany,” a temporary appearance of Christ in the Old Testament. It is certain, however, that this special angel of the Lord is divine, for Hagar “…gave this name to the LORD, who spoke with her [as the Angel of the LORD]: ‘You are the God who sees me,’ as she observed, ‘I have now seen the One who sees me'” (Gen 16:13). 1

Other instances of Jesus’ appearances in the Old Testa- ment can be seen representatively in Genesis 22:11, 15, where it was the Angel of Yahweh who spoke from heaven to Abraham when Abraham was about to sacrifice Isaac, and stopped him from proceeding. Again, it was the Angel of Yahweh who appeared to Moses in the flame of fire in Exodus 3:2. Throughout the dialogue at that burning bush, it was also declared that he was no one less than “Yah- weh,” who spoke at that time, causing Moses to hide his face from him (Ex 3:6).

Later, it was the same Angel of the Lord who appeared to the wife of Manoah (Judg 13:2-25), mother of Samson, whom she reported to her husband was indeed a “man of God” that had appeared to her. When Manoah asked for the “Angel of the LORD” to also appear to him as he had appeared to his wife, the Angel repeated the appearances and his conversations to him, after which he ascended in the flame of the altar (Judg 13:20), implying the sacrifice was in worship of the Lord himself! Moreover, this “An- gel” is regarded as a “Redeemer,” who saves Israel from evil (Isa 63:9).

How can readers of the Old Testament doubt that these sample instances, along with a host of other such descrip- tions in the earlier Scriptures, were anything less than pre-incarnate appearances of our Lord Jesus in real flesh, even if it was in those days only a temporary in-flesh-ment/ incarnation for the immediate needs of the people until he would come and take on flesh permanently? Oftentimes Jesus came to earth to help his people in their distress and their need for direction. The only examples of the Angel of Yahweh turning against Israel occur in 2 Samuel 24 and 1 Chronicles 21, where the Angel is the agent of God’s punishment of David, because he disobeyed God and conducted a national census.

Old Testament Predictions of the Coming Messiah

In addition to the real presence of Jesus as the Angel of the Lord/God, J. Barton Payne2 listed some 574 verses in the Old Testament that had direct personal messianic foretellings. Payne found 127 personal messianic predictions involving some, 348 verses that had any or all types of real and typological prophecies of Jesus’ first or second coming. This number was exceeded only by Alfred Edersheim,3 who noted that in some 558 rabbinic writings in pre-Christian times, there were some 456 separate Old Testament/Tanak passages used to refer to the Messiah or to messianic times!

In my own book, The Messiah in the Old Testament,4 I was able to identify 65 direct predictions of Jesus’ com- ings in the Old Testament. Few will dispute that there are at least six direct Messianic predictions in the Pentateuch: Genesis 3:15; 9:27; 12:2-3; 49:8-12; Numbers 24:15-19; and Deuteronomy 18:15-18.

Eve was promised in Genesis 3:15 that a male descen- dant from her line would crush the head of the serpent, i.e., the Devil himself, and win completely over evil, as the prince of evil, Satan, would be finally vanquished. Then in Genesis 9:27, God would come and live/dwell in the tents of Shem, the Semitic peoples. But which one of the Semites did God intend: the Arabs or the Jewish people? Abraham settled that question, for God called him to go from Ur of Mesopotamia to Israel, and he was to be a blessing for all the nations on earth in Genesis 12:3.

This promise could be narrowed down even further for the tribe of Judah. Son number four of Jacob would be the one God would invest with the scepter of ruling and the one from whom the line of Messiah would descend (Gen 49:8-12). In fact, this coming one from Judah would be “A star [that would] come out of Jacob, a scepter [that would] rise out of Israel” (Num 24:17). Moreover, the Messiah who would come would also be a “prophet” (Deut 18:15) as well as a “king” (Ps 72).

If the book of Job is to be placed in the period of the patriarchs (c. 2100 1800), as we believe he is to be placed, then there are four texts in Job that should be added to the six in the Pentateuch. There Messiah is called an “angel” and a “Mediator” (Job 33:23-28).

Add to these 10 direct Messianic prophecies another five from the times both prior to and during the Davidic period. He is seen as the “Anointed” one in 1 Samuel 2:1-10 and the “faithful Priest” in 1 Samuel 2:35-36. But the most outstanding text by far is the Davidic Covenant text found in 2 Samuel 7 (repeated in 1 Chron 17) and elaborated on in Psalm 132, which pointed to the dynasty/house of David as the place where God would originate his throne, dynasty and kingdom forever. The promise given to King David was so astounding that David cried out in 2 Samuel 7:19c that “This is the law/charter for [all] humanity.” In other words, God had just now conferred on David an enlargement of the promise he had originally made with the patriarchs.5

There is not enough space to relate how 11 Psalms celebrate the person and work of the coming Messiah, but even though he would be rejected (Ps 118), and betrayed (Pss 69, 109), die and be resurrected (Pss 22, 16), he would come as Conqueror and Enthroned Ruler (Pss 2, 110), as Planner and Groom (Pss 40, 45), and as Triumphant King (Pss 68, 72).

In addition to the previous 15 direct references to the coming Messiah, there are some 39 predictions of the Mes- siah in the Old Testament prophets. A sample of these announcements before they happened would include these facts. First, it was predicted that Messiah would be born of a virgin (Isa 7:14; cf. Mt 1:33). His birthplace would be Bethlehem (Mic 5:2; cf. Mt 2:1, 6), and John the Baptist would be his forerunner (Isa 40:3-5; Mal 3:1; cf. Mt 3:3, Mk 1:3; Lk 3:4-6).

It was further announced ahead of time that Messiah would enter Jerusalem [what turned out to be Palm Sunday] in Triumph as the crowd shouted “Hosanna” (Zech 9:9-10; Ps 118:25-26; cf. Mt 21:9; Mk 11:9; Lk 19:38; Jh 12:13). But in less than a week, he would be betrayed [by one of his own disciples, Judas, as it turned out] (Ps 69:25; cf. Acts 1:20).

Messiah’s side would be pierced (Zech 12:10; cf. Jh 19:37), and he would suffer vicariously for the sins of the world (Isa 53:6, 9, 12; cf. I Pt 2:21-25; Rom 4:25). Even more dramatically accurate was the fact that Jesus would be killed with the “wicked” ones (Isa 53:9a, note the plural noun in Hebrew) [as he hung between two thieves], yet he would be buried with the rich one (Isa 53:9b, note its singu- lar form in the Hebrew).

But that was not the end of the matter for the predictions about Jesus in the Old Testament, for Messiah would return to earth a second time (Daniel 7:13; cf Mk 13:26; Lk 21:27), and he would one day rule in the city of Jerusalem as King f kings, as the nations would go up to that city to be taught in his ways, never more to “train for war anmore” (Isa 2:3-4).

As far as the case for the Messiah in the Old Testament is concerned, the relationship between the Old and New Testaments is one of strong continuity and a progressive revelation. The seminal seeds of the doctrine of the person and work of Jesus bloom and blossom in the New Testament even though the Old Testament often carried in seminal seed form much that eventually developed out of the Old. What a gracious, revealing God, and what a wonderful gift of a Savior who has come to earth once, but who is due to return once more in all his fullness and glory!

Muslims claim Jesus and Muhammad teach the SAME message – do they?

Muhammad said Allah hates those who don’t accept Islam.
(Qur’an 3:32, 22:38)

Jesus said God loves everyone.
(John 3:16)

Muhammad
“I have been commanded to fight
against people till they testify that there
is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad
is the messenger of Allah”
(Muslim 1:33)

Jesus
“He who lives by the sword
will die by the sword.”
(Matthew 26:52)

Muhammad
Stoned women for adultery.
(Muslim 4206)

Jesus
“Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.”
(John 8:7)

Muhammad
Permitted stealing from unbelievers.
(Bukhari 44:668, Ibn Ishaq 764)

Jesus
“Thou shalt not steal.”
(Matthew 19:18)

Muhammad
Permitted lying.
(Sahih Muslim 6303, Bukhari 49:857)

Jesus
“Thou shalt not bear false witness.”
(Matthew 19:18)

Muhammad
Owned and traded slaves.
(Sahih Muslim 3901)

Jesus
Neither owned nor traded slaves.

Muhammad
Beheaded 800 Jewish men and boys.
(Sahih Muslim 4390)

Jesus
Beheaded no one.

Muhammad
Murdered those who insulted him.
(Bukhari 56:369, 4:241)

Jesus
Preached forgiveness.
(Matthew 18:21-22, 5:38)

Muhammad
“If then anyone transgresses
the prohibition against you,
Transgress ye likewise against him”
(Qur’an 2:194)

Jesus
“If someone strikes you on the right
cheek, turn to him the other also.”
(Matthew 5:39)

Muhammad
Jihad in the way of Allah elevates one’s position in Paradise by a hundred fold.
(Muslim 4645)

Jesus
“Blessed are the peacemakers, for
they will be called Sons of God”
(Matthew 5:9)

Muhammad
Married 13 wives and kept sex slaves.
(Bukhari 5:268, Qur’an 33:50)

Jesus
Was celibate.

Muhammad
Slept with a 9-year-old child.
(Sahih Muslim 3309, Bukhari 58:236)

Jesus
Did not have sex with children.

Muhammad
Ordered the murder of women.
(Ibn Ishaq 819, 995)

Jesus
Never harmed a woman.

Muhammad
“O you who believe! Fight those of the
unbelievers who are near to you
and let them find in you hardness.”
(Qur’an 9:123)

Jesus
“Blessed are the meek, for
they shall inherit the earth.”
(Matthew 5:5)

Muhammad
Ordered 65 military campaigns
and raids in his last 10 years.
(Ibn Ishaq )

Jesus
Ordered no military campaigns, nor
offered any approval of war or violence.

Muhammad
Killed captives taken in battle.
(Ibn Ishaq 451)

Jesus
Never took captives.
Never killed anyone.

Muhammad
Encouraged his men to rape enslaved women.
(Abu Dawood 2150, Qur’an 4:24)

Jesus
Never encouraged rape.
Never enslaved women.

Muhammad
Demanded captured slaves and
a fifth of all other loot taken in war.
(Qur’an 8:41)

Jesus
“The Son of Man came not
to be served, but to serve.”
(Matthew 20:28)

Muhammad
Was never tortured, but tortured others.
(Muslim 4131, Ibn Ishaq 436, 595, 734, 764)

Jesus
Suffered torture, but never tortured anyone.

Muhammad
“And fight them until there is no more persecution and religion is only for Allah”
(Qur’an 8:39)

Jesus
“Love your enemies and pray
for those who persecute you”
(Matthew 5:44)

Matthew 7:15-20

Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves.16″You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thornbushes nor figs from thistles, are they?17″So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. 18″A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit.19″Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20″So then, you will know them by their fruits.

? “I AM the Way, the Truth, and the Life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by Me.” (John 14:6)

Refuting The Stupid I am Meme

This meme proves you do not know how to read properly

Abraham said “here I am” in Genesis 22.11 he did not say his name is I AM

Moses said “here I am” in Exodus 3:4 he did not say his name is I AM

The blind man said “I am he” in Exodus 3:4 he did not say his name is I AM

The disciples said “is it I” in John 26.58 they did not say their name is I AM

Jesus repeats the words “I am.” Jesus equates Himself with the “I AM” title God gave Himself in Exodus 3:14.

The Bread of Life

And Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. He who comes to Me shall never hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst.” -John 6:35

Light of the World

Then Jesus spoke to them again, saying, “I am the light of the world. He who follows Me shall not walk in darkness, but have the light of life.” -John 8:12

The Door

“I am the door. If anyone enters by Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture.” -John 10:9

Good Shepherd

“I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd gives His life for the sheep.” -John 10:11

The Resurrection and Life

Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?” -John 11:25, 26

The Way, the Truth and the Life

Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.” -John 14:6

The Vine

“I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing.” -John 15:5

I can do nothing 2

“I can do nothing on My own initiative. As I hear, I judge; and My judgment is just, because I do not seek My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. 31″If I alone bear witness of Myself, My testimony is not true. 32″There is another who bears witness of Me, and I know that the testimony which He bears of Me is true,” (John 5:30-32).

Muslims use these verses in their attempt to say that Jesus is not God. They reason that if Jesus were really God in flesh, then He could do anything He wanted to do; but here we see that Jesus says that He can do nothing on His own initiative. If this is true, then how can Jesus be God in flesh?

The answer is that Jesus is both God and man in one person. This doctrine is called the hypostatic union. As a man, Jesus was under the law and was obligated to keep the law (Gal. 4:4). In His humbled state of being lower than the angels (Heb. 2:9), Jesus was cooperating with the limitations of being a man (Phil. 2:5-8). Therefore, He was in complete subjection to the Father so that He might fulfill the law and be the high priest sacrifice for our sins (Heb. 5:10).

Furthermore, Jesus did not begin His miracles until His baptism. It was at that point that the Holy Spirit came upon Him. Therefore, Jesus was performing His miracles not by His own power but by the power of the Holy Spirit. This explains why in Matt. 12:22-32 when the Pharisees said that Jesus was casting out demons by the power of the devil, Jesus said that blasphemy of the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven. In other words, Jesus was doing His miracles by the power of the Holy Spirit and not under His own divine power which He had laid aside the rightful use of while he walked this earth doing the Father’s will.

Therefore, these verses do not mean that Jesus is not divine; but it does mean that Jesus, as a man, was completely and totally in submission to the will of the Father, and that Jesus would only do the will of the Father as the text clearly says.

I can do nothing 1

Muslims love to quote John 5:30 where Jesus says this:

“I can do nothing on my own. As I hear, I judge, and my judgment is just, because I seek not my own will but the will of him who sent me. (John 5:30, ESV)

The reason they do this is because it shows Jesus telling us that he seeks the will of the one that sent him.

They love this because they have absolutely no evidence that Islam existed before Muhammad did, and the only thing they can come up with is to say that Islam means submission and that those in the Old Testament that submitted to God were obviously Muslims because they submitted their will to God.

Never mind the fact that every single religion that ever existed that had a god mandates that you submit your will to their God. So what they are in essence saying is that Islam says the exact same thing that every other religion that ever existed says about their God.

What you will never ever see a Muslim post even one time is John 5:19 that has Jesus making the exact same statement, but with the reason he says it. Muslims don’t want you to know the reason he said this statement; they want to mislead you and deceive and that is the reason they will never post this statement from John 5:19, even though it’s the exact same statement.

So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of his own accord, but only what he sees the Father doing. For whatever the Father does, that the Son does likewise. (John 5:19, ESV)

But the other reason they will never ever post this verse is because it shows even more proof that Jesus is one with the father. Muslims want to suggest that Jesus being one with the father is no different than Jesus being one with us and they will refer you to John 17 20-23.

20 “I do not ask for these only, but also for those who will believe in me through their word, 21 that they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be in us, so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22 The glory that you have given me I have given to them, that they may be one even as we are one, 23 I in them and you in me, that they may become perfectly one, so that the world may know that you sent me and loved them even as you loved me. (John 17:20-23, ESV)

But Jesus makes it clear that being one with the father for him is far different and much more intimate. He literally sees what the father does and does likewise. This is more proof that Jesus is literally one with the father and literally God. No other prophet, or any other human being for that matter, could make the same statement.

If the Quran is true, then Islam is false

If the Quran is true, then Islam is false. Why? Because the Quran says to trust the Gospels and the four Gospels contradict the Quran. This means the Quran can’t be true if it says the gospel message is also true. In order to show this, I will quote several verses from the Quran. The more important ones are bolded for easy reference later.

None can change Allah’s words
6:34, “Rejected were the messengers before thee: with patience and constancy they bore their rejection and their wrongs, until Our aid did reach them: there is none that can alter the words (and decrees) of Allah. Already hast thou received some account of those messengers.”
6:115, “The word of thy Lord doth find its fulfilment in truth and in justice: None can change His words: for He is the one who heareth and knoweth all.”
18:27, “And recite (and teach) what has been revealed to thee of the Book of thy Lord: none can change His Words, and none wilt thou find as a refuge other than Him.”
Moses was given the Torah
2:87, “We gave Moses the Book and followed him up with a succession of messengers; We gave Jesus the son of Mary Clear (Signs) and strengthened him with the holy spirit. Is it that whenever there comes to you a messenger with what ye yourselves desire not, ye are puffed up with pride?- Some ye called impostors, and others ye slay!
3:3, “It is He Who sent down to thee (step by step), in truth, the Book, confirming what went before it; and He sent down the Law (of Moses) and the Gospel (of Jesus) before this, as a guide to mankind, and He sent down the criterion (of judgment between right and wrong).”
David was given the Psalms
4:163, “We have sent thee inspiration, as We sent it to Noah and the Messengers after him: we sent inspiration to Abraham, Isma’il, Isaac, Jacob and the Tribes, to Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon, and to David We gave the Psalms.”
Jesus was given the gospel
57:27, “Then, in their wake, We followed them up with (others of) Our messengers: We sent after them Jesus the son of Mary, and bestowed on him the Gospel; and We ordained in the hearts of those who followed him Compassion and Mercy. But the Monasticism which they invented for themselves, We did not prescribe for them: (We commanded) only the seeking for the Good Pleasure of Allah; but that they did not foster as they should have done. Yet We bestowed, on those among them who believed, their (due) reward, but many of them are rebellious transgressors.
Christians should judge by what is in the Gospel
5:47, “Let the people of the Gospel judge by what Allah hath revealed therein. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed, they are (no better than) those who rebel.”
The Quran confirms the Torah, the Psalms, and the Gospels and guards them
5:48 To thee [the people of the gospel] We sent the Scripture in truth, confirming the scripture that came before it, and guarding it in safety: so judge between them by what Allah hath revealed, and follow not their vain desires, diverging from the Truth that hath come to thee. To each among you have we prescribed a law and an open way. If Allah had so willed, He would have made you a single people, but (His plan is) to test you in what He hath given you: so strive as in a race in all virtues. The goal of you all is to Allah; it is He that will show you the truth of the matters in which ye dispute;
Ask Christians about spiritual things
10.94, “If thou wert in doubt as to what We have revealed unto thee, then ask those who have been reading the Book from before thee: the Truth hath indeed come to thee from thy Lord: so be in no wise of those in doubt.”
Curse on those who say God has a son
9:30, “The Jews call ‘Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah’s curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth!
Jesus not crucified
4:157, “That they said (in boast), “We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah”;- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not.”
Alright, so we see that…

None can change Allah’s words (6:34; 6:115; 18:27).
Jesus was given the gospel by Allah (57:27).
The Quran confirms the Gospels (5:48)
The Gospels contradict the Quran
So, if the Quran confirms the Gospels which says that Jesus was crucified (Matthew 27:26″31; Mark 15:15″20; Luke 23:32″34; John 19:17-18) and the Quran says Jesus was not crucified (Surah 4:157), then the Quran is false. But if it says the Gospels are false, then the Quran denies its own teaching and Islam is false.

Incredible Claims Require Incredible Proof

– By Abdullah Gondal (Former Islamist)

If I claim today that God gave me a book which is the best guidance for humanity. In that book it is mentioned that wife beating is permissible, women’s testimony is half of men, slavery and sex slavery is good, shooting stars are missiles thrown at Satan, women need to cover up only exposing their face and hands, all non believers are stupid idiot loser dogs and animals that will burn in hell forever, dead bodies come back to life just by throwing a piece of steak on it (surah baqarah verse 67 to 73), people in the past were turned into pigs and monkeys for fishing on a Sunday, Angels and Demons are real and all around us, the moon was split in half, earthquakes and tornadoes are a result of our sins….

People will laugh at it. They will say these are primitive archaic ideas. These are myths. The author of the book is delusional.

Yet when the exact same claim is made 14 centuries ago, these same deplorable ideas become full of wisdom and revered by billions as the literal word of God.

Don’t you see something wrong here?

Isaiah

“Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call His name Emmanuel,” Isaiah 7:14
Critics often claim that this verse was never meant to be a messianic prophecy. They point out that Isaiah 7 describes an encounter between Isaiah and King Ahaz. The “sign” in Isaiah 7:14 is offered to the King to assure him that God will deliver Judah from their coalition of enemies. The sign of a messiah being born long after King Ahaz was dead would not seem to accomplish the goal. They argue, therefore, that Isaiah 7:14 could only be talking about something that happened shortly after Isaiah spoke those words and could not have anything to do with the Messiah.
The problem with this argument is that it assumes that Isaiah 7 was written in a vacuum. It assumes that the story was written with no connection to the rest of the book of Isaiah and for absolutely no purpose other than to duly record an event. The Book of Isaiah, however, is not a memoir or a work of history. There is very little narrative in Isaiah at all. When it does tell a story, it is utilising that story to make a larger point. When the New Testament author cited Isaiah 7:14 in reference to Jesus, it was not merely ripping the verse out and slapping it on the page. It was making a larger case that Jesus was the fulfilment of a series of prophecies about a promised Messianic Son in Isaiah 7-12.
Matthew directly applied the verse to Jesus, saying:
“Now all this took place to fulfil what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet: ‘Behold, the virgin shall be with child and shall bear a Son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel,’ which translated means, ‘God with us,'” (Matthew 1:22-23)
Luke’s gospel, however, lays out the point more holistically. While Luke does not directly quote from any one verse, Luke 1:31-33 directly connects the virgin birth with prophecies quite like Isaiah 9:7, such as sitting on the throne of David and ruling over a kingdom forever. There is also language similar to that of Isaiah 10-11. Luke is not merely proof-texting, but applying the idea of the promised Davidic Son of Isaiah 7-12 as a whole to Jesus, starting with the virgin birth. Likewise, Matthew does not cite only Isaiah 7:14. Matthew 4:15-16 also applies Isaiah 9 to Jesus, and a case can be made that Matthew 2:23 applies Isaiah 11 to Jesus as well. Elsewhere in the New Testament, Jesus is explicitly identified with the “root of Jesse” in Isaiah 11:10 (Romans 15:12) as well as the “stone of stumbling” from Isaiah 8:14-15 (Romans 9:33, 1 Peter 2:8). Clearly, they saw Isaiah using the story of his encounter with King Ahaz as part of a larger point that Isaiah was making to his readers in that whole section of his book.
But is this really what Isaiah intended? The details certainly point that way:
1. In Isaiah 7:3, when God sends Isaiah to speak to the king, God tells Isaiah to bring his son Shear-jashub. The Bible specifically says that Isaiah’s children are signs from the Lord to Israel (Isaiah 8:18) and in the very next chapter we are told of Isaiah naming another one of his children as a prophetic sign (Isaiah 8:3-4). The fact that Isaiah is told to bring a specific son by name is no accident. It is a part of his message. The child’s name, Shear-jashub, means “a remnant shall return.” Isaiah’s conversation with the king is about God protecting Judah, but embedded here was something more: a promise that a remnant would return. Return from where? From exile, of course. The whole Book of Isaiah is dealing with the coming exile and the promise of return and restoration. That was not, however, King Ahaz’s concern. He was concerned about his enemies at that moment, and God promised to protect him from those enemies. Yet, God was also clearly speaking to something bigger than that, and He had Isaiah bring with him the message “a remnant shall return.” If you read Isaiah 7-12 together, this message is central and frequently repeated. It is also a future Messianic hope.

2. Isaiah is speaking to King Ahaz in the singular, but when we reach 7:13, the grammar changes and he is speaking to “the house of David” in the plural. While it is hard to see it in the English, the pronouns change from the singular “you” to the plural “you,” and the verb forms reflect a plural address. Isaiah delivered his prophecy in such a way as to speak to a broader audience than the King alone.

3. Isaiah 8:8 goes on to refer to Emmanuel as the one to whom the land belongs, so the promised child of Isaiah 7:14 is brought over into the greater context, and not as a mere bystander. Isaiah 9:6-7 describes the promised Son who will sit on the throne of David and rule forever. Isaiah 11 speaks of a shoot from the stump of Jesse (David’s father) who will rule in righteousness. The image is of the house of David as a tree that has been cut down to a stump, but then a new shoot springs forth from the tree and brings forth new life. It is an image of a future restoration through a new Davidic king. There is a consistent theme of a future Messiah to be born. It runs throughout the passage and begins with Isaiah 7:14 and the first promise of Emmanuel.

4. The inclusion of this story in Isaiah’s book at all shows that it contained a message for later readers and not just for King Ahaz alone. There probably was a child born in the days of Ahaz that served a sign for him in his situation, but we are told nothing more about that because that was not the point of telling this story. Isaiah told this story to point to the larger message to his readers, the message of coming judgement and the promise of restoration. There was a dual fulfilment of this prophecy that was intended by God from the very beginning. That’s what made this story meaningful even to Isaiah’s original readers, who themselves would have read this chapter well after King Ahaz and Jerusalem’s deliverance from the immediate, temporary threat. Isaiah’s prophecies were about the coming exile and the later hope of restoration under the Messiah. Isaiah includes the story because it contained that message, even if King Ahaz would not have known it.
The narrow and superficial reading of Isaiah 7 offered by sceptics misses all of this and therefore misses the beautiful consistency that runs through these chapters. Isaiah is warning the people that a violent judgement is coming, but he also promises a hope beyond that trial. The ultimate hope of an eternal kingdom and a Messiah King who will be “God with us” and who will be called “Mighty God.” Jesus is that divine Messiah.

Isaiah 7.20 and Shaving

Isaiah 7 . 20 says nothing about private parts

20 In that day the Lord will shave with a razor that is hired beyond the River with the king of Assyriathe head and the hair of the feet, and it will sweep away the beard also.

The LORD will bring the king of Assyria upon you: This was bad news to Ahaz, who had been foolishly trusting in Assyria instead of the LORD. It is as if the LORD is saying, “It will seem to you like trusting in Assyria is a clever move, because the armies of Syria and Israel will be defeated. But the Assyrians will end up defeating you also.”

“Thou mightest have remained at home and at ease, and mightest have received the assistance of God; but thou choosest rather to call in the Assyrians. Thou shalt find them to be worse than thine own enemies.” (Calvin)

If Ahaz understood and believed what the LORD said, it would have terrified him. The Assyrians were well known for their sheer cruelty, especially over the nations they conquered. They delighted in the torture and humiliation (shave with a hired razor … the head and the hair of the legs).

To shave off the beard of an Oriental was an unbearable shame to him and was a sign of great sadness and mourning as well as despicable slavery.” We see this principle illustrated by the actions of David in 2 Samuel 10:4-5.