GOD AS OUR SHEPHERD IN THE BIBLE: WHO IS NOWHERE FOUND IN ISLAM
1). INTRODUCTION
The motif of the shepherd is found throughout Scripture. In the Old Testament God has words of strong rebuke and warning for bad shepherds, and prophecies of a good shepherd that is to come. In the New Testament, Jesus identifies himself as the Good Shepherd and we find in the epistles the notion of good shepherding extended to those who would lead in the church.
But remarkably the shepherd motif is completely absent from Islamic writings. This is a red flag which Muslims should take notice of, and is another indication that the Bible and Quran cannot describe the same God.
This post will address the following questions:
□ Why might have God chosen to use this particular image?
□ What are the characteristics of a good shepherd?
□ Why Jesus is the Good Shepherd
□ Why in Islam the idea of God as a shepherd is absent.
2). WHY THE IMAGE OF A SHEPHERD?
The idea of God acting as the Shepherd of His people, is a recurring theme throughout the Bible, from beginning to end. In Genesis 48:24, as Jacob, on his deathbed summarized his life, he declared that God had been his “shepherd all of his life to this day.” In Revelation 7:17, when the saints who come out of the tribulation are brought before God, John brings together two of the most striking images of the scripture by stating:
“For the Lamb who is at the center of the throne will shepherd them; He will guide them to springs of living waters, and God will wipe away every tear from their eyes.”
The theme of the shepherd is highly significant. It appears at critical times in the narrative of the history of God’s people, and hardly another metaphor is as evocative or rich in content.
Why did God choose to include this description as part of His revelation to man? Scripture itself does not give a direct explanation, so the answer cannot be definitive. However, there would appear to be several good reasons.
■ Shepherding was, and still is to a certain extent, a very common occupation for those in the Middle East.
■ The Patriarchs were all shepherds, as was Moses and of course David.
■ It was to shepherds in the field that the news of the birth of Christ was first revealed!
■ The terrain and geography of the area lend itself to the raising of both sheep and goats, but in particular sheep. There is scarcity of grass and less than abundant sources of water.
■ Sheep are moved from one area to another with relative ease and require less water than other domestic animals. But they are vulnerable. Both as prey to attack but in being easily misled and lost.
■ The shepherd and his sheep describes a relationship. Sheep literally do recognise the shepherd’s voice and will respond to it to the exclusion of others. And once they’ve learned to recognise it they trust it and answer to it. The attached video gives proof:
https://youtu.be/e45dVgWgV64
The idea of shepherding leaders was not an exclusive feature of the Bible or for the nation of Israel. King Hammurabi of Babylon called himself a shepherd, and Homer regularly styles the Greek chiefs as shepherds of their people. In fact, history has shown, “from ancient antiquity rulers were described as demonstrating their legitimacy to rule by their ability to ‘pasture’ their people.” This makes sense then of verses like those found in Jeremiah 49:19 and 50:44, where God asks, “who is the shepherd who can stand against me?”
In this connection, the royal staff, or scepter, a common accessory for kings in the Ancient Near East, was itself a form of shepherd’s rod. Shepherds commonly used long poles such as these to poke around crevices in caves to scare out scorpions and snakes. It came to be a symbol of protection, power and authority. Even in Egypt, a divine symbol of kingship was the shepherd’s crook.
Thus it is true that the idea of shepherd as leader is not exclusive to the Bible. However, what we will find is that God as the ultimate shepherd of His people takes this concept to a level found in no other culture or faith.
As we look at the characteristics of a good shepherd it will become clear that God chose this motif at least in part because His people are so apt to act like sheep. Verses like Isaiah 53:6 remind us over and over again that God’s people and sheep are very much alike and the connection is mostly negative. Sheep are not only dependent creatures; singularly unintelligent, prone to wandering and unable to find their way to a shepherd even when he is in sight. The analogy is fitting. It is clear, because of our helplessness and our tendency to wander and get lost we are in need of a Good Shepherd. A sheep that gets snowbound or falls on its back is helpless until rescued. Without the shepherd it would perish.
3). THE CHARACTERISTICS OF A GOOD SHEPHERD
The Bible gives in great detail what a good shepherd would look like both in the Psalms and in the words of Christ himself. However, before turning to these descriptions it will be beneficial to consider in the broadest terms what the focus of a leader of God’s people should be, and in specific how the poor leaders of Israel failed in this regard.
The focus of a good shepherd was to be on his flock – their provision, guidance and safety. The epitome of the bad shepherds, in Ezekiel’s expose of Israel’s leaders of his day (34:1-6), sketches out in vivid terms, what it looked like when leaders failed to provide this care. These leaders were slaughtering their sheep for their own gain rather than feeding them. (This calls to mind the hireling of John 10:10, who comes only to steal, kill and destroy and also of Jesus’s scathing rebuke of the Pharisees in Matthew 23).
Rather than caring for the flock, they treated them with “force and severity.” (vs.4) Perhaps Ezekiel’s greatest rebuke was for their lack of guidance. Three times he mentions that the sheep are scattered. They were lost, became prey for every beast and had no one to search or seek them. (vs.6) Jeremiah, in his judgment of the leaders of Israel took this notion one step further, connecting a lack of spirituality on the leaders part with the scattering of the sheep. In Jeremiah 10:21 he states, no doubt in reference to the captivity of Judah, “For the shepherds have become stupid, and have not sought the Lord; Therefore they have not prospered, and all their flock is scattered.”
Knowing that the bad shepherd fails to provide for the sheep, protect the sheep and guide the sheep, the picture of the good shepherd laid out in scripture comes into clearer view. The most famous description of the good shepherd, and perhaps one of the most well known passages in the whole Bible, is Psalm 23. These lines were penned by David, not a theoretician when it came to sheep and their welfare, but the rendition of a true shepherd. David’s ability as a shepherd was clearly connected with God using him to masterfully lead Israel. In Psalm 78:70-72 we read:
“He chose David His servant and took him from the sheepfolds; He brought him from tending ewes to be shepherd over His people Jacob — over Israel, His inheritance. He shepherded them with a pure heart and guided them with his skillful hands.” (Psalms 78:70-72)
Entire books have been written detailing the work and nature of the shepherd in Psalm 23.
This Post has only room to sketch brief highlights of the shepherd’s provision for his flock.
□ The good shepherd provides nourishment and refreshment for his sheep. In verse 2 we are told he causes the sheep to lie down in green pastures. This indicates a place to rest but also a supply of food on hand. Also present is water that is welcoming in addition to refreshing. This met a critical need due to the shortage of water in the region as already pointed out.
□ Later in the Psalm David conveys the idea of abundant provision in a different way. He speaks of a table being set, his cup overflowing, and his head being anointed with oil. Bedouin hospitality often called for just such a lavish response to a guest, and the anointing with oil was a symbol of lavish generosity and goodness on behalf of a hostess for their guest. (Ecclesiastes 9:8) David points out that the skilled shepherd
■ MAKES them lie down (vs.2),
■ LEADS them (vs.2) and
■ GUIDES them (vs.3).
He provides guidance which is so critical for sheep that are by their nature apt to stray or wander into danger because they are so helpless. This was a critical aspect of leadership and the very reason given for Joshua being appointed to carry on for Moses in Numbers 27:15 –17. It is interesting to note that David is aware that the shepherd provides in this way not because of the inherent worthiness of the sheep, but because of the reputation of the shepherd. Also, the picture here is of the shepherd leading the way. Sheep in the Middle East are not driven like in the West due to differences in the terrain. For the most part, in the Middle East the shepherd goes ahead of the sheep, choosing the way to go.
Not only did the shepherd provide nourishment and direction, but David goes out of his way in Psalm 23 to convey the idea of the shepherd providing safety and protection. Sheep are extremely skittish and fearful, but the shepherd was equipped to protect them, with his rod able to ward off wild animals and thieves.
Isaiah understood this about the good shepherd as well. In Isaiah 40:11 he pictures the Shepherd’s protection by pointing out his care for the most helpless of the flock. The newborn and the nursing mothers with young are the members most vulnerable to attack. “Like a shepherd He will tend His flock, In His arm He will gather the lambs, and carry them in His bosom; He will gently lead the nursing ewes.”
4). JESUS IS THE GOOD SHEPHERD
In Jesus’ description of Himself in John 10, He takes our understanding of what makes for a good shepherd to a new level. The good shepherd is self sacrificial. He is willing to ignore his own needs in order to meet the needs of the sheep. Over and over in this chapter He states the good shepherd gives His own life for His sheep.
“I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. The hired man, since he is not the shepherd and doesn’t own the sheep, leaves them and runs away when he sees a wolf coming. The wolf then snatches and scatters them. This happens because he is a hired man and doesn’t care about the sheep. “I am the good shepherd. I know My own sheep, and they know Me, as the Father knows Me, and I know the Father. I lay down My life for the sheep. But I have other sheep that are not of this fold; I must bring them also, and they will listen to My voice. Then there will be one flock, one shepherd.” (John 10:11-16)
Jesus’ audience understood the analogy and sacrificial nature of the shepherd in His discussion of the sheepfold. When sheep were penned in at night outside the city, the shepherd himself would often construct a makeshift fold. He would take brush and bushes and construct them in a “u” shape or some other formation depending on what was already at hand. He would then place thorny branches on top of the brush to both inhibit the sheep from jumping out and from wild animals and thieves jumping into the enclosure to hurt or kill the sheep. (Robbers would accomplish their goal by climbing over the enclosure, slitting the throat of the sheep and heaving the body/bodies over the wall. This helps explain John 10:1). The only way in and out of the fold was through a space he would leave open. The shepherd himself would actually lie across the opening, becoming the door in and out of the sheepfold. The shepherd’s own comfort and sleep were secondary to the comfort and safety of the sheep. Additionally, we know too from the story told in Luke 15 that a worthy shepherd indeed does go and search for a lost sheep. He is willing to make this effort unlike the worthless shepherds already mentioned who allow the sheep to wander and be preyed upon. Jesus finalizes the notion of the sheeps’ security by stating in John 10:28-29 that with Him they are eternally secure.
The other characteristic of the good shepherd Jesus makes crystal clear in his discussion of the topic in John 10, is that the good shepherd is personally, if not intimately involved with all His sheep. His closeness with the individual sheep is clear in vs. 3 when it says He calls them by name. From Nathan’s story in 2 Samuel 12, we know that sheep were sometimes given the status of pet. In fact, so close were the shepherds with their flock that one shepherd is reported to be able to tell which lamb went with which nursing mother in the dark by merely feeling it’s head! The shepherd is also involved enough with His flock that they know His voice. In those days multiple flocks would sometimes be brought into the sheepfold for the night. The next day each shepherd in turn would stand in the middle of the fold and call his own out. It was not a matter of the exact call or words used, but the sheep responded primarily to the distinct tone of the shepherd’s voice.
In summary, the good shepherd showed great concern for his sheep. He provided for them in terms of nourishment and rest. He guided them, leading the way. He was intimately involved with the flock and concerned for the safety of each individual. He was willing to sacrifice his own comfort, even his own life, for the sake of his sheep.
This is the kind of love and care with which God wanted His rulers to lead Israel in the Old Testament, and the writers of the New Testament have much of this in mind when it comes to leadership and pastoral care in the church. It was in this context that Jesus challenged Peter to prove his love after his betrayal. After each admission of love on Peter’s part Jesus said, “Feed My lambs” John 21:15, “Feed my sheep” vs.16, and again in vs.17. Peter charges the elders at the churches in present day Asia Minor to:
“Shepherd God’s flock among you, not overseeing out of compulsion but freely, according to God’s will; not for the money but eagerly; not Lording it over those entrusted to you, but being examples to the flock. And when the chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the unfading crown of glory.” (1 Peter 5:2-4)
Understanding the level of love, commitment and sacrifice expended by the shepherd on behalf of the sheep raises the bar for those who seek to lead in the church.
5). WHY GOD IS NO SHEPHERD IN ISLAM
Several points stand out which should act like a stone in the shoe for all Muslims.
Firstly, there is zero allusion to God as a shepherd in the Quran. Even when the Quran could have employed the motif it prefers “goat-herd” in a disparaging condemnatory tone as here:
“The parable of those who reject Faith is as if one were to shout like a goat-herd, to things that listen to nothing but calls and cries: Deaf, dumb, and blind, they are void of wisdom.” (Surah 2.171 Yusuf Ali)
Islam has no idea of God having any sort of relationship with people, still less the leading guiding, protective or pastoral role of a shepherd who cares for his sheep. The imagery of shepherding of the flock, and the shepherd metaphor are completely alien to and lost in Islam’s rewriting of history. The second red flag is the absence of sacrifice in Islam.
“Without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness” (Hebrews 9:22), and that’s why the symbolism of the scarlet thread in the Bible is significant. The scarlet thread is the theme of atonement found throughout the pages of Scripture.
But its no surprise to discover there is no atonement in Islam.
The purpose of Abraham sacrificing his son is left unexplained. Tabari II:84 “When Abraham was told to sacrifice Isaac, Satan said, ‘By Allah, if I cannot deceive the people with this, I shall never be able to do it.’” Satan not only swears by Allah, he says that the bogus connection between Abraham and Islam is his best way to fool mankind. He was right! It’s also interesting that the deception would be over sacrifice. Judaism, Christianity, and all rational civilizations use sacrifice as the means to promote justice and maintain spiritual or societal order. Commit a crime and you will be required to sacrifice your money, your freedom, or your life. If crime is without cost, anarchy reigns.
In Judaism, the sacrificial rite for the forgiveness of sin was rich in symbolism. It was based upon the “Mercy Seat” of the Arc of the Covenant. And it was connected prophetically to the blood of an unblemished lamb or dove. It’s all explained in the Torah. In Christianity, Christ became the perfect lamb and sacrificed himself on our behalf. But in Islam, there is no shepherd, no protection, and above all no atoning sacrifice. While the Sunnah perpetuates Qusayy‘s senseless slaughter, it’s for appeasement, not atonement. There is no symbolism, no prophetic implication, no retribution, no justice and no moral reason, as forgiveness is capricious in Islam. And that’s why totalitarian governments use draconian measures to maintain order. Muhammad was an amoral thief empowered by situational scriptures, so he failed to appreciate the necessity of sacrifice and he never understood the Biblical concept of sacrificial atonement. It’s why the “ransom of great sacrifice” mentioned in the Quran is left unexplained. It’s also why the shepherd motif is avoided. Expressions like “Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world” (John 1:29), “the good shepherd who lays down His life for the sheep” (John 10:11), “I am the good shepherd. I know My own sheep, and they know Me, as the Father knows Me, and I know the Father. I lay down My life for the sheep.” (John 10:14-15) are conveniently ignored.
Make no mistake: Islam offers no model for pastoral care. It has no relationship with its god other than blind subservience. There is no leadership other than the battle cry call to arms. Of the many names for Allah “good shepherd” is not amongst them.
6). CONCLUSIONS
There is nothing in the Quran like the End Time prophecy of the returning shepherd king in Matthew 25:31-34. “When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. And all the nations will be gathered before Him; and He will separate from one another, as the shepherd separates the sheep from the goats; And He will put the sheep on His right, and the goats on the left.” In this passage the shepherd goes on to direct the sheep (the righteous – vs.37, 46) to the kingdom prepared from the foundation of the world, and the goats, to eternal punishment. The metaphor here relates to the fact that often a shepherd tended a mixed flock of both sheep and goats. There were times when the two groups needed to be separated. This was a common part of the shepherding job, clearly understood by Jesus’ audience. These passages teach that the Good Shepherd will come to judge between nations and individuals at the end of the age. For those who are His, these were meant to be words of comfort. For those who were not, words of great trouble.
Thus, the Old Testament looks forward to the coming of the Good Shepherd, and in Matthew we still see His future return to complete that role. Make no mistake He will complete it in His second coming, for this is when He will come in judgment to sort and separate the righteous from those who did not know Him, and to finally care for and lead those that are His own.
Muslims need to ask themselves why the character of God in the Quran is in such contrast and so alien to that of the Bible. Where is the responsibility of Allah for his creatures? There is none. He predestines them and prescribes even how much they will sin. But never the remotest suggestion of protecting them from danger or knowing each other by name or voice recognition or searching for the lost. He does not take an active role in leading guiding feeding or nurturing those that are his. For those qualities you need the all loving God of the Bible and you need to know Him and be known by Him as a shepherd and a father. Above all as your savior who lay down His life for you. Come to the good shepherd Jesus and answer His call to His sheep. He did not come only for the lost sheep of Israel, He came for us all. Amen.
Further reading: Ezekiel 34
Category Archives: Refuting Islam
SURAH 4:157-158 Theme: The Crucifixion
ISLAM’S NEMESIS: THE HERESY OF SURAH 4:157
1). INTRODUCTION
We don’t have to look very far to find the raison d’etre for Islam. Surah 4:157-8 is actually the sole reason for Islam’s existence, it is Satan’s crude and unsubtle way of denying his defeat at Calvary. Although judging by the way it has succeeded in blinding 1.2 billion people to the truth, it might seem like a masterstroke, we don’t have to scratch the surface very far to see, it is also the main reason why Islam self destructs.
This Post is going to do an in depth expose of these two, the most controversial verses of the Quran, that attempt to challenge and rewrite what up to that time, had been 6 centuries of Gospel narrative based upon eyewitness testimony from 4 corroborating accounts, two of them authored by the Apostles of Jesus, Matthew and John, one Mark who was the scribe for a third Apostle Peter, and Luke, a physician with an eye for precise detail who also wrote Acts and became the Apostle Paul’s travelling companion. Then we have the remaining 23 books of the New Testament, all of them written within 60 years of the Ascension, upon the foundation of the same Gospel, not to mention dozens of writings of the Antenicean Church fathers, through all of which the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Chrust are established facts, at the heart of and the cornerstone for the Gospel. Arising from which the Church of Jesus Christ became the fastest growing and largest faith in the world, started in a place which was thoroughly hostile to it from the outset. And all of this had the ring of truth because of the severe persecution which followed in its wake. Not to mention because of often hostile historical sources which corroborate the central facts about the crucifixion, which are beyond the scope of one Post.
But here comes the Quran leftfield out the blue Arabian pagan skies more than half a millennium later, dismissing the entire narrative and sequence of events in just two sentences. Yes you read that right. Two sentences is supposed to do justice to defeat and overturn the entire weight of centuries of settled Middle Eastern history. Does that sound plausible? Is it reasonable? Is it in the least bit credible? Well the fact is that’s how Islam dismisses and brushes aside the foundation of the Christian faith and culmination of centuries of Old Testament prophecy which preceded and forshadowed it.
The paucity, the chaff of the Quran’s bland dismissal tells us something even before we start to examine what it says. The lack of substance, the absence of evidence is damning. Absence of evidence confirmed by absence of witness testimony, a narrator or explanation. No details. No names, nothing verifiable. A load of speculative conjecture. A dozen questions begged. Total lack of fit with the historical facts.
But it is what it is. Its not the critics fault that the Quran is so lacking in substance or credibility. Since that’s how feeble and flimsy and threadbare the Islamic case is we shall have to deal with it accordingly.
2). WHAT THE QURAN SAYS HAPPENED (OR DIDN’T HAPPEN)
Here to remind us are what it says. I am using the Shakir translation because its honest enough to admit that it’s speaking about ‘Isa’, the mistaken name the Quran gives the Messiah, who for the record is NOT the historical Jesus of the Bible, but a figure of gnosticism and myth. (No English translation of the Quran should EVER adopt and abuse the name of Jesus, but that is what the other main English translations, Khalifa, Pickthall, Sherali and Yusuf Ali do, they all insert Jesus name here, to their shame).
“And their saying: Surely we have killed the Messiah, Isa son of Marium, the apostle of Allah; and they did not kill him nor did they crucify him, but it appeared to them so (like Isa) and most surely those who differ therein are only in a doubt about it; they have no knowledge respecting it, but only follow a conjecture, and they killed him not for sure” (4:157 Shakir).
“Nay! Allah took him up to Himself; and Allah is Mighty, Wise” (4:158 Shakir).
3). SOME QUESTIONS ARISING
Here are just a few questions begged by this fictional alternative narration:
1. Islam doesn’t believe in substitutional sacrifice … yet it appears that Allah substituted someone else for Isa in that verse.
2. Allah claimed “they were in doubt” is factually false, its a strawman fallacy. For more than two thousand years, both before and after the Quranic version of events, Christians, Jews and Romans have been in agreement over the issue of Jesus Christ being crucified. It was never, and has never been in doubt. There is not a shred of historical evidence for an uncrucified Messiah, not from Scripture or any other source outside of gnostic heresy. The facts are overwhelming, there is sure knowledge and there is no conjecture. On all counts those words in Surah 4:157 “those who differ therein are only in a doubt about it; they have no knowledge respecting it, but only follow a conjecture,” are palpably wrong. Purely from the historical point of view, that descriptive is unrecognisable. At first glance it appears nothing more than a deceitful twisting and rewriting of history.
3. It is the case that its Muslims who are actually the ones in doubt of what happened. The only “doubts” are what the Quran seeks to spread. Who was substituted? For what purpose? Since when has Allah EVER intervened to save anyone from death? There was no moral imperative or precedent for his going to such lengths to rescue “his messenger”. Subsequent events also give the lie to this fabrication. Why would Allah have rescued the Messiah and not repeated the same trick with his last and greatest Messenger Muhammad? His failure to enable Muhammad to identify that a Jewish woman had served him a plate of poisoned food from which he died a lingering false prophet’s death by poison, destroys his and his “last” messenger’s credibility.
4. Who actually was used as Isa’s substitute? Some claim Judas Iscariot, (in spite of him having hung himself before the crucifixion), some say Simon of Cyrene, (in a twisting of Mark’s account and/or adopting the gnostic writings of the 2nd Century sect founder Basilides), some say ‘Jesus’ Barabbas. But look for any consensus amongst Muslims as to who it was and you will never find it.
5. Let’s skip over who it was and why it was necessary and assume for sake of argument that a substitute whether Judas or Simon of Cyrene, Barabbas or some other anonymous poor wretch, was made to resemble Jesus and crucified in His place. But none of these alternatives can account for the facts of the empty tomb and post mortem appearances. The substitution theory is not only implausible, it falls flat at the first hurdle and simply fails to explain or account for what happened.
6. Where does the claimed boast “we killed the Messiah, Isa son of Mariam” even come from? Who is on record of making this statement? This sentence is a vague paraphrasing at best, a factual error at worst. The Jews never acknowledged Jesus as their Messiah in the first place so it’s an expression the Jews would never have used.
7. “THEY did not kill him nor did THEY crucify him” is question begging. Notice what is left unsaid. It does not say that the Messiah did not die, it merely says that they (the Jews) were not responsible for killing or crucifying Him.
On a strict and narrow reading, this statement alone might appear consistent with the Gospel narrative for it was the Roman jurisdiction that bore direct responsibility for crucifying Jesus. Roman soldiers were the ones who crucified him – not the Jews. But note from the historical account in Acts, the accusation of the disciples to the Jewish leaders that:
“The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified His Servant Jesus, whom you handed over and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he had decided to release Him. [14] But you denied the Holy and Righteous One and asked to have a murderer given to you. [15] YOU KILLED THE SOURCE OF LIFE, WHOM GOD RAISED FROM THE DEAD; WE ARE WITNESSES OF THIS.” (Acts 3:13-15 HCSB)
Acts 3:15 alone destroys the Islamic claim. Here Peter states the facts; he has no qualms about accusing the Jews, because Pilate had been willing to release Him, so the Jews by preferring to have the criminal Barabbas released and condemning Jesus, made them culpable for His death. Surah 4:157 is thus a lie on all counts, firstly because there was a crucifixion, it was Jesus who was crucified and the Jews were primarily responsible. Moreover, everyone who ever lived is an accessory to murder, because our sins helped nail Jesus to the cross. Nobody is innocent of His shed blood and we are all accountable and will be held to account.
But above all this, we have the sovereign will of God. Nothing that happened was apart from God’s will. As we shall see, all the events were in perfect alignment with, and fulfilment of, what had been decreed in prophesy from centuries before.
Even the Quran has an echo of this. Again by noting that Surah 4:157 does not deny Jesus’ crucifixion, but simply denies that it was the Jews who were responsible for the crucifixion, the question remains hanging who was responsible for Jesus death? Elsewhere, the Quran gives an answer, as the following passage demonstrates:
“Ye (Muslims) slew them not, but Allah slew them. And thou (Muhammad) threwest not when thou didst throw, but Allah threw, that He might test the believers by a fair test from Him. Lo! Allah is Hearer, Knower.” (Surah 8:17 Pickthall)
Now we are getting closer to reality. So Allah slew Jesus? If so how, when and where? The very next verse 4:158 ambiguously says “Allah took him up to himself” it doesn’t say whether dead or alive – again that’s consistent with Allah being responsible for his death, or it might mean that Allah raised him alive! More confusion, ambiguity, lack of clarity, detail or explanation, leaving only unanswered questions, as always that’s what the Quran does best.
Nevertheless, pressing on, if it wasn’t the Jews who crucified Christ, but God’s set purpose which allowed Christ to be crucified, then this is precisely what the Bible teaches:
“Though He was delivered up according to GOD’S DETERMINED PLAN AND FOREKNOWLEDGE, you used lawless people to nail Him to a cross and kill Him. [24] God raised Him up, ending the pains of death, because it was not possible for Him to be held by it. [25] For David says of Him: I saw the Lord ever before me; because He is at my right hand, I will not be shaken. [26] Therefore my heart was glad, and my tongue rejoiced. Moreover, my flesh will rest in hope, [27] BECAUSE YOU WILL NOT LEAVE ME IN HADES OR ALLOW YOUR HOLY ONE TO SEE DECAY.” (Acts 2:23-27 HCSB)
“BUT WHAT GOD PREDICTED THROUGH THE MOUTH OF ALL THE PROPHETS — that His Messiah would suffer — He has fulfilled in this way.” (Acts 3:18 HCSB)
“For, in fact, in this city both Herod and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles and the people of Israel, assembled together against Your holy Servant Jesus, whom You anointed, [28] TO DO WHATEVER YOUR HAND AND YOUR PLAN HAD PREDESTINED TO TAKE PLACE.” (Acts 4:27-28 HCSB)
“but with the precious blood of Christ, like that of a lamb without defect or blemish. [20] HE WAS CHOSEN BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD but was revealed at the end of the times for you [21] who through Him are believers in GOD, WHO RAISED HIM FROM THE DEAD and gave Him glory, so that your faith and hope are in God.” (1 Peter 1:19-21 HCSB)
“All those who live on the earth will worship him, everyone whose name was not written from the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who was slaughtered.” (Revelation 13:8 HCSB)
4). OTHER ISLAMIC COMMENTARY
Since the Quran leaves so many questions unanswered let’s turn to the Tafsir to see what commentary we can find that might shed some light on the Islamic version of events. From Ibn-kathir:
“The Jews also said, (“We killed Al-Masih, `Isa, son of Maryam, the Messenger of Allah,”) meaning, we killed the person who claimed to be the Messenger of Allah. The Jews only uttered these words in jest and mockery, just as the polytheists said, (O you to whom the Dhikr (the Qur’an) has been sent down! Verily, you are a mad man!) When Allah sent `Isa with proofs and guidance, the Jews, may Allah’s curses, anger, torment and punishment be upon them, envied him because of his prophethood and obvious miracles; curing the blind and leprous and bringing the dead back to life, by Allah’s leave. He also used to make the shape of a bird from clay and blow in it, and it became a bird by Allah’s leave and flew. `Isa performed other miracles that Allah honored him with, yet the Jews defied and belied him and tried their best to harm him. Allah’s Prophet `Isa could not live in any one city for long and he had to travel often with his mother, peace be upon them. Even so, the Jews were not satisfied, and they went to the king of Damascus at that time, a Greek polytheist who worshipped the stars. [Anyone heard of such a king in Damascus at that time, and why no mention of a name?] They told him that there was a man in Bayt Al-Maqdis [Jerusalem] misguiding and dividing the people in Jerusalem and stirring unrest among the king’s subjects. The king became angry and wrote to his deputy in Jerusalem to arrest the rebel leader, stop him from causing unrest, crucify him and make him wear a crown of thorns. When the king’s deputy in Jerusalem received these orders, he went with some Jews to the house that `Isa was residing in, and he was then with twelve, thirteen or seventeen of his companions. [If it’s already sounding like a bad alibi that’s because it is].That day was a Friday, in the evening. They surrounded `Isa in the house, and when he felt that they would soon enter the house or that he would sooner or later have to leave it, he said to his companions, “Who volunteers to be made to look like me, for which he will be my companion in Paradise” A young man volunteered, but `Isa thought that he was too young. He asked the question a second and third time, each time the young man volunteering, prompting `Isa to say, “Well then, you will be that man.” Allah made the young man look exactly like `Isa, while a hole opened in the roof of the house, and `Isa was made to sleep and ascended to heaven while asleep. Allah said, (And (remember) when Allah said: “O `Isa! I will take you and raise you to Myself.”) When `Isa ascended, those who were in the house came out. When those surrounding the house saw the man who looked like `Isa, they thought that he was `Isa. So they took him at night, crucified him and placed a crown of thorns on his head. The Jews then boasted that they killed `Isa and some Christians accepted their false claim, due to their ignorance and lack of reason. As for those who were in the house with `Isa, they witnessed his ascension to heaven, while the rest thought that the Jews killed `Isa by crucifixion. They even said that Maryam sat under the corpse of the crucified man and cried, and they say that the dead man spoke to her. All this was a test from Allah for His servants out of His wisdom. Allah explained this matter in the Glorious Qur’an which He sent to His honorable Messenger, whom He supported with miracles and clear, unequivocal evidence. Allah is the Most Truthful, and He is the Lord of the worlds Who knows the secrets, what the hearts conceal, the hidden matters in heaven and earth, what has occurred, what will occur, and what would occur if it was decreed. He said, (but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but it appeared as that to them,) referring to the person whom the Jews thought was `Isa. This is why Allah said afterwards, (and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture.) referring to the Jews who claimed to kill `Isa and the ignorant Christians who believed them. Indeed they are all in confusion, misguidance and bewilderment. This is why Allah said, (For surely; they killed him not.) meaning they are not sure that `Isa was the one whom they killed. Rather, they are in doubt and confusion over this matter (But Allah raised him up unto Himself. And Allah is Ever All-Powerful,) meaning, He is the Almighty, and He is never weak, nor will those who seek refuge in Him ever be subjected to disgrace, (All-Wise.) in all that He decides and ordains for His creatures. Indeed, Allah’s is the clearest wisdom, unequivocal proof and the most glorious authority.”
Source: www.recitequran.com/tafsir/en.ibn-kathir/4:157
“Clear unequivocal evidence”? An unnamed Greek polytheist King of Damascus? Like where and who? It’s a fable long story lacking a narrator, with no named witnesses and with total absence of historically verifiable details that does nothing but add to the confusion. I have only included it to demonstrate the elaborate lengths that Islam has to go to in trying to explain their version of events. It is neither plausible nor credible and has no ring of truth to it whatsoever.
Even amongst the Muslims who believe that someone else was killed in Jesus’ place, not all unanimously agree that it was Judas, or indeed which Judas:
1. A Jew named Judas (not to be confused with Judas Iscariot) entered a house where Christ was, with the purpose of arresting Him, but did not find Him. God caused the likeness of Christ to be on him, and when he came out of the house people thought he was Jesus, and took him and crucified him.
2. The Jews, when they arrested Jesus, set over Him a watchman, but Jesus was taken up to God by a miracle and God caused Jesus’ likeness to rest on the watchman, whom they took and crucified, while he cried out “I am not Jesus.”
3. One of Jesus’ friends was promised Paradise, and volunteered to die instead of Him. God caused him to resemble Jesus and he was taken and crucified but Jesus was taken up to heaven.
4. One of Jesus’ followers betrayed Him, (that is, Judas), and came to the Jews to guide them to Him, and went with them to take Him. God caused him to appear like Jesus and he was taken and crucified. (Adapted from Iskander Jadeed’s The Cross in the Gospel and the Koran [The Good Way, P.O. Box 66 CH-8486 Rikon, Switzerland], pp. 12-13; online edition)
5. Titawus, a Jew, entered the house where Jesus was, trying to arrest Him. He could not find Him. Instead, God changed his likeness and made him resemble Jesus. Upon coming out, the Jews had him arrested and crucified, thinking that he was Jesus. (Jadeed, Victory Of The Truth [Good Way], p. 113)
6. Some Muslims try to twist Mark’s narrative to suggest that it was Simon of Cyrene who was crucified based on a faulty interpretation of Mark 15:21-24, where they make “him” refer to Simon rather than Jesus in verse 22.
Al-Tabari in his commentary lists more conflicting views:
• Some Muslims have stated that “When the Jews surrounded Jesus and His friends, all took on the likeness of Jesus. The Jews were confused and so killed one of the others.” (On the authority of Salma)
• “Jesus came with seventeen disciples. The Jews surrounded them. God made the disciples in the likeness of Jesus. The Jews said to the disciples, `You have bewitched us. You’d better tell us which one of you is Jesus, or we will kill you all.’ Then Jesus said to the disciples, `Who is willing to give his life today for paradise? One of the disciples volunteered and went outside saying to the Jews, `I am Jesus.’ They took him and crucified him.”
• “The Children of Israel surrounded Jesus and nineteen of His disciples in a house. Jesus said to the disciples, `Who is willing to take my image, die, and go to Paradise?’ One disciple offered himself, and was taken outside and crucified, while Jesus ascended up to heaven.”
• Finally, “David the King of Israel sent a man to kill Jesus. That man took men with him. Jesus was with thirteen of His disciples. When He knew they had arrived He made one of the disciples to look exactly like Him. When the Jews saw that disciple, they took him outside and crucified him.” (Adapted from Jadeed’s Victory Of The Truth, pp. 114-115).
So far no consensus and no answers. Let’s leave that blind alley and look at the next verse.
5) WHAT OF SURAH 4:158? DOES IT EXPLAIN WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED TO ISA?
Turning to the next verse 4:158, we get no more clarity as to what is meant, even when we try to compare it with other related verses such as these:
“Behold! God said: `O Jesus! I will take thee (Arabic- inni mutawaffeeka) And raise thee to Myself And clear thee (of the falsehoods) Of those who blaspheme…” (Surah 3:55 Yusuf Ali)
“Never said did I to them Aught except what Thou Didst command me To say, to wit, `Worship God, my Lord and your Lord’; And I was a witness over them whilst I dwelt Amongst them; when thou Didst take me up (Arabic- tawaffaytani) Thou wast the Watcher Over them, and Thou art a witness to all things.” (Surah 5:117 Yusuf Ali)
The phrase “I will take thee” and “when Thou didst take me” are forms of the Arabic word ‘tawaffa’. The term is nearly always used in the Quran to imply one who is taken at death.
Some commentators say that Jesus died and remained dead for three hours; others say seven, and so on. But the word is used here to really show that the Jewish plans to cause Jesus’ death on the cross would be frustrated and that he would afterwards die a natural death … Pickthall’s translation is, “O Jesus, I am gathering thee”, and this is the Biblical idiom for causing to die. Yusuf Ali, in his first edition, translated the words as meaning I will cause thee to die, but in the second edition he changed it to I will take thee.” (Ali, Holy Quran, p.147, f. 436).
According to Tabari, Muslims such as Hasan al-Basri and Matar al-Warraq argued that Jesus did not die. In fact, according to Basri Muhammad had told the Jews, “Jesus did not die, and he will return to you before the Day of Resurrection.”
According to a tradition attributed to Ka’b al-Ahbar as reported by Mu’awiyah b. Salih, “God would not cause Jesus son of Mary to die.” Instead God told Jesus that he would send him “against the one-eyed deceiver (al-Dajjal), and you will slay him. You will then live for twenty-four years, after which I will cause you to die the death of the living.” (Ayoub, p. 170) Yet, according to Tabari, other Muslims asserted “that God received Jesus by causing him to die.”
Ayoub notes:
“This view (that God caused Jesus to die) is reported on the authority of Ibn Abbas and Wahb b. Munabbih who said, `God caused Jesus to die for three hours of the day, during which He raised him up to Him.’ Ibn Ishaq mistakenly reports that `Christians claim that God caused Jesus to die for seven hours, after which He brought him back to life.'” (Ibid.)
[Note the erroneous reporting of the Christian view in the last mentioned commentary – no Christian claims “God caused Jesus to die for seven hours”].
5). OTHER THEORIES
An alternative view is that Jesus was crucified but did not die. He swooned and on the third day was resuscitated by some of his disciples, namely Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus. From there he went to India and died at an old age.
Muslims who adhere to this view include the Ahmadiyyas and the Nation of Islam (NOI). Orthodox Sunni Muslims consider these sects to be heretical.
Amazingly, the most famous swoon theory proponent is neither an Ahmadi or a member of the NOI. Rather it is South African Muslim Apologist Ahmad Deedat, considered by many to be Islam’s greatest defender.
In his writings and debates, Deedat attempted to prove that Jesus did not die on the cross but simply swooned. He also attempted to prove that Jesus did not rise from the dead. Jesus simply recovered and appeared alive to his followers, proving that he had not died on the cross.
This theory will also not work since it contradicts the Quranic witness that Jesus was neither crucified nor killed. And it also contradicts Muhammad’s statement that Jesus did not die.
6). CONCLUSIONS
Going full circle back to the problematic verse Surah 4:157:
“Surely those who differ therein are only in a doubt about it; they have no knowledge respecting it, but only follow a conjecture, and they killed him not for sure” … in the light of all the possible explanations, the only people these words describe accurately are those peddling Islamic heresy, those who cannot agree what happened or who was involved. As it does so often we find the Quran ends up describing what Islam itself and Muslims are guilty of.
Questions still unanswered:
□ Was Isa killed and by whom? Nobody can tell us, certainly the Quran doesn’t.
□ Who was substituted for Isa? Nobody knows and the Quran doesn’t tell us.
□ For what possible motive would anyone have taken Isa’s place? It certainly wasn’t fulfilling any prophecy, Biblical or Quranic. Indeed the Quran records this prophetic word of Isa’s death:
“And peace on me on the day I was born, and on the day I die, and on the day I am raised to life.” (Surah 19:33 Shakir)
□ Why would Allah act completely out of character just to thwart one death? Especially, since the Quran admits that all prophets were killed and Allah never lifted a finger to rescue any of them before or since? If Allah intervened on Isa’s behalf to save Him from a horrible death by crucifixion, then He acted contrary to his own nature of detached indifference. By contrast, he did nothing to warn, avert, prevent or rescue Muhammad from a lingering false prophet’s death by poison. Again we have only questions but no answers.
□ How does any Quranic explanation account for the facts of the empty tomb, the post mortem appearances, the transformation of the Apostles, the explosive rise of the early church, even in the face of vicious persecution, and above all the lack of any contemporary source to refute anything reported by the Gospels? It utterly fails to address a single one of these burning questions.
The tomb where the apparent body of Judas (looking like Jesus) was laid, was a short walk from the Temple where the disciples were proclaiming loudly to the crowds that the Messiah had risen from the dead. It should have been easy for the Jewish leaders to discredit their resurrection message simply by showing the body (looking like Jesus) in the tomb.
It is a fact that the message of the resurrection (which could easily have been disproven with a body still in the tomb) began near the tomb itself, where the evidence could be seen by everyone. Since the Jewish leaders did not refute their message by showing a body, we can only conclude that there was no body to show. The message of the empty tomb was irrefutable.
■ Thousands believed the resurrection message in Jerusalem
Thousands at one time were being converted to believe in the physical resurrection of Jesus in Jerusalem at this time. If you had been one of those in the crowds listening to Peter, wondering if his message was true, would you not have at least taken a lunch break to go to the tomb and take a look for yourself to see if there was still a body there? If the body of Judas (resembling the Messiah) was still in the tomb no one would have believed the message of the Apostles.
But history records that they gained thousands of followers starting in Jerusalem. These are indisputable facts. That would have been impossible with a body that looked like that of the prophet still around in Jerusalem. Judas’ body remaining in the tomb leads to absurdities. It does not make sense. In any event there is the far more credible account of what actually happened to Judas. He was the one who committed suicide.
■ Judas as a substitute theory cannot explain the empty tomb.
The problem with this theory of Judas being transformed to look like Jesus and then being crucified and buried in his place, is that it fails to explain the facts. It presents us with a dead end and an occupied tomb (pun intended). But the empty tomb is the only explanation for the disciples being able to start, just weeks later at Pentecost, a movement based on the resurrection in the same city as the execution witnessed by hundreds of believers – which incidentally destroys another desperation theory of sceptics – the hallucination theory.
There were only two options, one with Judas’ body looking like the Messiah remaining in the tomb, and His resurrection with an empty tomb. Since the body remaining in the tomb leads to absurdities, then the only explanation which fits all the facts, is that the witness testimony compiled in 4 separate Gospel accounts, testimony which was sealed and written in the Apostles own blood, confirms that Jesus must have died at the hands of the Romans and risen from the tomb as clearly stated and recorded in the completed Canon of Scripture by the close of the 1st Century. This is centuries before the Quran or Islam existed.
There is only one credible viable explanation which fits all the facts. Those who saw and witnessed the events leading up to during and after the crucifixion, who were with Christ before and after His death, who were persecuted and died for their testimony, but could never be challenged, disproved, shamed or discredited with counter evidence, these must have been telling the truth.
All of which makes Surah 4:157 a fabrication and a lie from the pit of hell.
Islam Is Paganism
ITS ISLAM NOT CHRISTIANITY THAT IS PAGANISM
This Post is going to debunk a myth that goes around far too freely. Yes, the Muslim charge that the incarnation and/or doctrine of the Trinity is pagan, is nonsense and needs calling out. Moreover it needs pointing out that yet again Muslims try to tarnish Christians with what they in fact are guilty of.
Muslims bandy about terms without having a clue of their meaning or origin.
□ DEFINITION OF PAGAN
Pagan; Paganism: “a person holding religious beliefs other than those of the main world religions; who adheres specifically to a non-Christian or pre-Christian religion.”
Merriam-Webster has the following entries:
1): HEATHEN sense 1 especially : a follower of a polytheistic religion (as in ancient Rome)
2: one who has little or no religion and who delights in sensual pleasures and material goods : an irreligious or hedonistic person
3: NEO-PAGAN witches, druids, goddess worshippers, and other pagans in America today— Alice Dowd
2). Of, relating to, or having the characteristics of pagans
//pagan customs/beliefs
// Reuse of Roman objects was not uncommon during the Middle Ages, although the discovery of ancient sculpture was usually a momentous event, and pagan images in particular provoked fearful responses — Peter Scott Brown
// In addition to moon-rituals, wiccans celebrate pagan seasonal holidays — Scott McMurray
According to Merriam-Webster, the term “Pagan” comes from the Latin word ‘paganus’, which was used at the end of the Roman Empire to identify those who practiced a religion other than Christianity, Judaism, or Islam. Early Christians often used the term to refer to non-Christians who worship multiple deities. In Latin, ‘paganus’ originally meant “country dweller” or “civilian;” it is believed that the word’s religious meaning developed either from the enduring non-Christian religious practices of those who lived far from the Roman cities where Christianity was more quickly adopted, or from the fact that early Christians referred to themselves as “soldiers of Christ,” making nonbelievers “civilians.”
Paganism is simultaneously a prehistoric and postmodern religion – it is as ancient as the fertility symbols associated with the veneration of gods and goddesses tens of thousands of years ago, while its newest forms have emerged as recently as the mid-20th century.
Broadly speaking, Paganism encompasses two key characteristics: 1) religious and spiritual practices concerning the worship of, or devotion to, the earth, the natural world, and/or the manifest physical universe; and/or 2) belief in spiritual beings: goddesses, gods, nature spirits (fairies, elves, power animals), and ancestral spirits.
□ ISLAM NOT AN ABRAHAMIC FAITH
And I will take issue with Islam being a mainstream Abrahamic faith and therefore not pagan. It fits far more readily the above dictionary definition characteristics of paganism, in respect of devotion to the Cosmos and is ruled by the lunar calendar. Celestial emblems adorn every mosque.
Be under no illusion, Allah the Islamic deity, is a pagan god of idolatrous roots and invention. Allah bears no relation to the Lord God of Judaism or Christianity, both of which faiths, recognise what the Bible teaches from the outset – the plurality of the Godhead. Whether etymologically, by personality, self revelation, commandments, purpose or moral attributes, the Islamic god is incompatible and woefully deficient in comparison to God as revealed in the Bible. He has nothing in common with Yahweh and everything in common with pagan pre-Islamic celestial worship, and Sabeanism.
If you Google “who was the chief god of the Quraysh” this is the first answer you will get:
“Hubal
Hubal (Arabic: هُبَل) was a god worshipped in pre-Islamic Arabia, notably by Quraysh at the Kaaba in Mecca. He was the patron the chief god of Muhammad’s tribe the Quraysh.”
Not to put any gloss on it, Muhammad was born into pagan Baal worship. If Allah is simply a generic name for God and not a proper name for God then we must ask which Allah did Muhammad’s tribe worship, the answer can only be Hubal. Hubal is the proper name of pre-Islam’s god.
The Cambridge companion to the Quran page 24:
“The sira literature presents Mecca’s cult as a pagan one to the god Hubal, and depicts the Arabian religious environment in which Muhammad grew up as overwlemingly pagan – the final vestiges of the ancient near eastern religious tradition.”
Hubal “chief god of the Kaaba, a marshal and auricular deity a moon god” (‘God goddesses and mythology’ vol. 11 page 137)
Hubal “an idol the god of the moon” (The New Encyclopedia of Islam page 209)
Hubal was an idol from Syria. He was the god of the Moabites.
There is a broad consensus that the high god of Mecca was Hubal:
“… The great god of Mecca was Hubal, an idol of carnelian.” (Maxime Rodinson, Muhammad [New Press, NY, May 2000 ISBN: 1565847520], p. 16)
“… The Kaaba which may have initially been a shrine of Hubal alone, housed several idols …” (Rodinson, p. 40)
“… The presiding deity was Hubal, a large carnelian kept inside the temple; 360 other idols were arranged outside …” (Malise Ruthven, Islam in the World [Oxford University Press, Second edition 2000], p. 15)
“… Although originally under the aegis of the pagan god Hubal, the Makkan haram which centered around the well of Zamzam, may have become associated with the ancestral figures of Ibrahim and Isma’il as the Arab traders, shedding their parochial backgrounds sought to locate themselves within the broader reference-frame of Judeo-Christianity.” (Ibid., p. 17)
“… the god of Makka, Hubal, represented by a statue of red carnelian, is thought to have been originally a totem of the Khuza’a, rulers of Makka before their displacement by the Quraysh …” (Ibid. p. 28)
“… At the time of Muhammad, the Kaaba was OFFICIALLY DEDICATED to the god Hubal, a deity who had been imported into Arabia from the Nabateans in what is now Jordan. But the pre-eminence of the shrine as well as the common belief in Mecca seems to suggest that it may have been dedicated originally to al-Llah, the High God of the Arabs …” (Karen Armstrong, Muhammad: A Biography of the Prophet [Harper San Francisco; ISBN: 0062508865; Reprint edition, October 1993], pp. 61-62)
“… Legend had it that Qusayy had travelled in Syria and brought the three goddesses al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat to the Hijaz and enthroned the Nabatean god Hubal in the Kaaba …” (Armstrong, p. 66)
“Pre-Islamic Arabia also had its stone deities. They were stone statues of shapeless volcanic or meteoric stones found in the deserts and believed to have been sent by astral deities. The most prominent deities were Hubal, the male god of the Kaaba, and the three sister goddesses al-Lat, al-Manat, and al-Uzza; Muhammad’s tribe, the Quraysh, thought these three goddesses to be the daughters of Allah. Hubal was the chief god of the Kaaba among 360 other deities. He was a man-like statue whose body was made of red precious stone and whose arms were of solid gold.” (George W. Braswell, Jr., Islam Its Prophets, Peoples, Politics and Power [Broadman & Holman Publishers, Nashville, TN; July, 1996], p. 44)
“Hubal. An idol, God of the moon. It was set up in the Kaaba and became the principal idol of the pagan Meccans.” (Cyril Glassé, The Concise Encyclopedia of Islam [Harper & Row: San Francisco, 1989], p. 160)
“… the principal gods at Mecca were Hubal (god of the moon) and the female goddesses.” (Ibid., p. 179)
Ibn Al-Kalbi in his “Book of Idols’ (see: answering-islam.org/Books/Al-Kalbi/index.htm) notes:
“The Quraysh were want to venerate her above all other idols. For this reason Zayd ibn-‘Amr ibn-Nufayl, who, during the Jahilyah days, had turned to the worship of God and renounced that of al-‘Uzza and of the other idols, said:
‘I have renounced both Allat and al-‘Uzza, For thus would the brave and the robust do. No more do I worship al-‘Uzza and her two daughters, Or visit the two idols of the banu-Ghanm; Nor do I journey to Hubal and adore it, ALTHOUGH IT WAS OUR LORD WHEN I WAS YOUNG.’
… The Quraysh had also several idols in and around the Kaaba. The greatest of these was Hubal. It was, as I was told, of red agate, in the form of a man with the right hand broken off. It came into the possession of the Quraysh in this condition, and they, therefore, made for it a hand of gold. The first to set it up [for worship] was Khuzaymah ibn-Mudrikah ibn-al-Ya’s’ ibn-Mudar. Consequently it used to be called Khuzaymah’s Hubal.
It stood inside the Kaaba. In front of it were seven divination arrows (sing. qidh, pl. qidah or aqduh). On one of these arrows was written “pure” (sarih), and on another “consociated alien” (mulsag). Whenever the lineage of a new-born was doubted, they would offer a sacrifice to it [Hubal] and then shuffle the arrows and throw them. If the arrows showed the word “pure,” the child would be declared legitimate and the tribe would accept him. If, however, the arrows showed the words “consociated alien” the child would be declared illegitimate and the tribe would reject him. The third arrow was for divination concerning the dead, while the fourth was for divination concerning marriage. The purpose of the three remaining arrows has not been explained. Whenever they disagreed concerning something, or purposed to embark upon a journey, or undertake some project, they would proceed to it [Hubal] and shuffle the divination arrows before it. Whatever result they obtained they would follow and do accordingly.
It was before [Hubal] that ‘Abd-al-Muttalib shuffled the divination arrows [in order to find out which of his ten children he should sacrifice in fulfilment of a vow he had sworn], and the arrows pointed to his son ‘Abdullah, the father of the Prophet. Hubal was also the same idol which abu-Sufyan ibn-Harb addressed when he emerged victorious after the battle of Uhud, saying:
“Hubal, be thou exalted” (i.e. may thy religion triumph);
To which the Prophet replied:
“Allah is more exalted and more majestic.”
(Source: answering-islam.org/Books/Al-Kalbi/uzza.htm)
Thus the association of Islam and its rites and rituals with celestial worship, places it full square within a pagan setting. The main influences in the main Islamic texts are gnostic sources, the heretical and occult Simon Magus, and Persian myths and legends.
It is no coincidence that Allah only ever “spoke” during one false self acclaimed “prophet’s” life and was never heard from before nor since. Its no coincidence that gods of pagan religions are remote and unknowable. In complete contrast to how God reveals Himself in the Bible.
I wouldn’t agree with atheist Matt Dillahunty about much but he is spot on here:
“If god does exist, it either interacts with the universe in some detectable way or it doesn’t. If it doesn’t, that god is indistinguishable from a non-existent god.”
This sums up the pagan moon god makeover that Muhammad gave Hubal to rebrand him as Allah. Islam’s god is anonymous, incognito, inscrutuble, non communicative, indescribable, and undetectable. Muhammad even admitted he only existed in his imagination!
Bottom line: Its impossible to relate to or worship a god who is unknowable. That’s why God came down to earth and took on the appearance of a man so we can see His exact likeness in Jesus.
This is why Muslims have to deify Muhammad and make him not Allah the subject of blasphemy laws and object of Durood Shareef because they know Allah doesn’t exist.
No wonder Muslims all over the world have continued in this figment of imagination syndrome they contracted from their so called prophet Muhammad.
SUMMARY
Muslims say the Incarnation is paganism but it is literally the opposite of paganism because Jesus Christ is not a man made god but rather God made man for our salvation. Similarly a triune God of co equal and co eternal persons has no parallel in paganism.
Saying the Trinity is “paganism” isn’t true just because you regurgitate this common misconception. Repeating a lie will never make it true however often repeated. There is not a single pagan religion comprised of a consubstantial and co-eternal Trinity of Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
There is One Name, One Throne, One Ousia, One Mind, One Will and One purpose. Jesus is eternally begotten by the Father outside of time and space such that They have eternally co-existed from the beginning anterior to all creation.
The Holy Spirit eternally proceeds from the Father through the Son. Jesus was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit. God did not have sex with the Virgin Mary to allow the incarnation. This is completely dissimilar to, and has no parallel in paganism. It is also completely at odds with the Islamic Issa who has more in common with the mythical Taurus than the historical Jewish Jesus of the Gospels.
Literally nothing about the Trinity is paganism. The only argument Muslims have is the strawman fallacy that Christians believe in a “Triad” of three gods. Yeah, well read the above points which are completely foreign to paganism. Seriously Muslims need to produce an actual argument against us, rather than the lame and feeble strawman attacks of 3 gods and a tag of paganism which does not fit Christianity in any shape or form, but absolutely applies rather to Islam.
Get Outlook for Android<aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
WAS CHRIST CRUCIFIED – Ahmed Deedat vs. Josh Mcdowell
THE DEBATE took place in August, 1981, in Durban, South Africa
THE TOPIC was the question: Was Christ crucified?
THE PARTICIPANTS were Josh McDowell and Ahmed Deedat, the president of the Islamic Propagation Centre in Durban, South Africa.
The debate, a transcript of which appears on the following pages, was divided into three parts: Opening arguments, 50 minutes. Rebuttals by each, 10 minutes. Closing statements, 3 minutes.
TRANSCRIPT OF THE DEBATE
OPENING ARGUMENTS
# Ahmed Deedat
Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen. On the subject of
crucifixion, the Muslim is told in no uncertain terms, in
the Holy Qur’an, the last and final revelation of God, that
they didn’t kill Him, nor did they crucify Him. But it was
made to appear to them so. And those who dispute therein,
are full of doubts. They have no certain knowledge; they
only follow conjecture, guesswork. For of a surety, they
killed Him not.
Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen. Could anyone have
been more explicit, more dogmatic, more uncompromising, in
stating a belief than this? The only one who was entitled to
say such words is the all-knowing, omniscient Lord of the
universe.
The Muslim believes this authoritative statement as the
veritable Word of God. And as such, he asks no questions,
and he demands no proof. He says, “There are the words of my
Lord; I believe, and I affirm.” But the Christian responds
in the words of our honorable guest. In his book, Josh
McDowell with Don Stewart in “Answers to tough Questions” on
pages 116 and 117, states the Christian’s attitude toward
this uncompromising statement of the Muslim. He says, “A
major problem with accepting Mohammed’s account is that his
testimony is 600 years after the event occurred, while the
New Testament contains eyewitness, or first hand, testimony
of the life and mini- stry of Jesus Christ.” In a nutshell,
the Christian asks how can a man a thousand miles away from
the scene of the happening of the crucifixion and 600 years
in time away from the happening know what happened in
Jerusalem? The Muslim responds that these are the words of
God Almighty. And therefore, as such, God knew what had
happened. The Christian naturally reasons that, had he
accepted this book, the Qur’an, as the Word of God, there
would have been no dispute between us. We would all have
been Muslims!
We have eyewitness and earwitness accounts of these
happenings which are stated for us in the Holy Bible, more
especially in the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
Now, the implication of this crucifixion is this: it is
alleged that Jesus Christ was murdered by the Jews by means
of crucifixion 2,000 years ago, And as such, the Jews are
guilty of the murder of Jesus Christ. We Muslims are told
that they are innocent because Christ was not killed, nor
was He crucified, And as such, I am given the [mandate] by
the Holy Qur’an to defend the Jews against the Christian
charge. I’m going to defend the Jews this afternoon, not
because they are my cousins, but simply because justice must
he done. We have our points of difference with the Jews –
that is a different question altogether. This afternoon, I
will try my very best to do justice to my cousins, the Jews.
Now, in this argument, this debate, this dialogue, I am
actually the defense counsel for the Jews, and Josh McDowell
is the prosecuting counsel. And you, ladies and gentlemen,
are the ladies and gentlemen of the jury. I want you to sit
back, relax and at the end of this, give judgment to
yourself, to your own conscience whether the Jews are guilty
or not of the charge as alleged by the Christians.
Now, to get to the point, as the defense counsel for the
Jews, I could have had this case against the Jews dismissed
in just two minutes – in any court of law, in any civilized
country in the world, simply by demanding from the
prosecuting counsel the testimonies of these witnesses,
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, And when they are pre- sented,
in the form of sworn affidavits, as we have them in the
gospels, I could say that, in their original, they are not
attested. And the proof – you get any authorized King James
Version of the Bible, and you’ll find each and every
affidavit begins: “The Gospel according to St. Matthew, the
Gospel according to St. Mark, the Gospel according to St.
Luke, the Gospel according to St. John.” I’m asking, ladies
and gentlemen of the jury, what is this “according …
according … according”? Do you know what it means? It
means Matthew, Mark, Luke and John didn’t sign their names.
It is only assumed that these are their work. And as such,
in any court of law, in any civilized country, they would be
thrown out of court in just two minutes.
Not only that, I can have this case dismissed TWICE in
two minutes in any court of law in any civilized country. I
said twice because one of the testators in the Gospel of St.
Mark, chapter 14, verse 50, tells us that at the most
critical juncture in the life of Jesus, all His disciples
forsook Him, and fled. ALL. If they were not there, the
testimony of those who were not there to witness what
happened will be thrown out of court. I said, twice in two
minutes, in just 120 seconds flat, the case would be over.
In any court of law. in any civilized country in the world.
But where is the fun of it? You have come a long way
from far and wide, after all the threatening rains. And now,
if we say the case is closed and go home, where is the fun
of it? To entertain you, I will accept those documents as
valid, for the sake of this dialogue, and we are now going
to put these witnesses into the box for cross-examination.
And I want you to see where the truth lies.
The first witness that I’m going to call, happens to be
St. Luke. And St. Luke has been described by Christian
authorities as one of the greatest historians. As a
historical book, the Gospel of St. Luke is unique. Now, we
get St. Luke. chapter 24. verse 36. I’m going to tell you
what he has said – what he has written in black and white.
He tells us that it was Sunday evening, the first day of the
week, when Jesus Christ walked into that upper room, the one
in which He had the Last Supper with His disciples. This is
three days after His alleged crucifixion. He goes in, and He
wishes His disciples, “Peace be unto you.” And when He said,
“Peace be unto you,” His disciples were terrified. Is that
true? We’re asking you. I would like to ask Him, why were
the disciples terrified? Because when one meets his
long-lost master, his grandfather, his guru, his Rabbi – we
Eastern people embrace one another; we kiss one another. Why
should His disciples be terrified? So Luke tells us they
were frightened, because they thought He was a spirit.
I’m only quoting what he said. And you can verify in
your own Bible at home. They were frightened, they were
terrified because they thought He was a spirit. I’m asking
Luke, did He look like a spirit? And he says no. I’m asking
all the Christians of the world again and again, of every
church and denomination, this master of yours, did He look
like a spirit? And they all say no. Then I say, why should
they think that man is a spirit when He didn’t look like
one? And everyone is puzzled – unless Josh can explain.
Every Christian is puzzled. Why should they think the man is
a spirit when He didn’t look like one? I will tell you. The
reason is because the disciples of Jesus had heard from
hearsay that the Master was hanged on the cross. They had
heard, from hearsay, that He had given up the ghost. In
other words. His spirit had come out: He had died. They had
heard from hearsay that He was dead and buried for three
days. All their knowledge was from hearsay, because as I
said at the beginning (Mark, chapter 14, verse 50), your
other witness says that at the most criti- cal juncture in
the life of Jesus all His disciples forsook Him and fled.
All! They were not there.
So, all the knowledge being from hearsay, you come
across a person who you heard was dead for three days. You
assume that He’s stinking in His grave. When you see such a
person. naturally, you’re terrified. So Jesus wants to
assure them that He’s not what they’re thinking. They are
thinking that He has come back from the dead. A resurrected,
spiritualized body, so He says – I am only quoting what Luke
says – He says, “Behold My hands and My feet.” Have a look
at My hands and My feet, that it is I, Myself. I am the same
fellow, man, what’s wrong with you? Why are you afraid? He
says, “Handle Me and see. Handle Me and see. For a spirit
has no flesh and bones, as you see me have.” A spirit:
indefinite article “a.” A spirit, any spirit, has no flesh
and bones, as you see me have. So, if I have flesh and
bones, I’m not a spirit: I’m not a ghost: I’m not a spook. I
am asking the English man – the one who speaks English as
his mother tongue – since I have flesh and bones. I’m not a
spirit: I’m not a ghost: I’m not a spook. I say. is that
what it means in your language?
I say, you Afrikaner, when a man tells you that, does it
mean that he’s not what you are thinking? That is, he is not
a spirit, he is not a ghost, he is not a spook. And
everybody responds “yes.” If a man tells you a spirit has no
flesh and bones, it means it has no flesh and bones. As you
see, I have these things, so I’m not what you’re thinking.
You are thinking that I was dead, and I have come back from
the dead and am resurrected. If a spirit has no flesh and
bones, in other words, he’s telling you that the body you
are seeing is not a metamorphosed body. It is not a
translated body; it is not a resurrected body. Because a
resurrected body gets spiritualized. Who says so? My
authority is Jesus. You say, “Where?” I say Luke, you look
again – chapter 20 in verse 36. What does he say? You see,
the Jews were always coming to Him with riddles; they were
always asking Him, “Master, shall we pay tribute to Caesar
or not? Master, this woman, we found her in the act. What
shall we do to her? Master …” Again and again. Now, they
come to Him and they ask Him, it says. “Master,” Rabbi in
the Hebrew language, “Master, we had a woman among us, and
this woman according to a Jewish custom, had seven
husbands.” You see, according to a Jewish custom, if a
brother of a man dies and leaves no offspring. then the man
takes his brother’s wife to be his own wife. And when he
fails the third brother does likewise, and the fourth and
the fifth and the sixth, and the seventh.
Seven brothers had this woman as a wife. but there was
no problem while on this earth because it was all one by
one. Now, they want to know from Him that at the
resurrection, in the hereafter, which one is going to have
her, because they all had her here. In other words, there
will be a war in heaven, because we believe that we will all
be resurrected simultaneously. All together. at one time.
And these seven brothers wake up at the same time. and they
see this woman and every one would say, “My wife! My wife!”
and there would be a war in heaven between the brothers for
this one woman.
So they want to know from Him which one is going to have
her on the other side. Luke. chapter 20, verse 36. Check it
out. In answer to that. Jesus said about these resurrected
men and women, “Neither shall they die anymore.” In other
words, “Once they are resurrected, they will be
immortalized.” This is a mortal body. It needs food,
shelter, clothing, sex, rest. Without these things mankind
perishes. That body will be an immortalized body. An
immortal body, no food, no shelter, no clothing, no sex, no
rest. He says neither shall they die anymore. For they are
equal unto the angels.
In other words, they will be angelized. They will be
spiritualized; they will be spiritual creatures; they will
be spirits! For they are equal unto angels and the children
of God. Such are the children of the resurrection – spirit!
He said “A spirit has no flesh and bones, as you see Me
have.” In other words, “I’m not resurrected.” And they
believed not for joy and wonders – Luke 24 again. What
happened then? We thought the man was already dead, perhaps
stinking in His grave. And they believed not for joy –
overjoy – and they wonder what hap- pened? So He says, “Have
you any broiled fish and a honeycomb here, meat – something
to eat?” And they gave Him a piece of bread and He took it
and ate it in their very sight. To prove what? I’m asking
ladies and gentlemen of the jury, what was He trying to
demonstrate? What? “I am the same fellow, man; I am not what
you are thinking, I have not come back from the dead.”
This was Sunday evening after the alleged crucifixion.
Let’s go back. What happened in the morning? Your other
witness, John, chapter 20, verse 1, tells us that it was
Sunday morning, the first day of the week, when Mary
Magdalene went to the tomb of Jesus. I’m asking John, why
did she go there? Or, let’s put another of your witnesses on
the stand, Mark, chapter 16, verse 1. Mark, tell us – why
did Mary go there? And Mark tells us, “She went to anoint
Him.” Now, the Hebrew word for anoint is ‘massahah’ from
which we get the word messiah in Hebrew and masih in Arabic.
The root word for both Arabic and Hebrew is the same.
Massahah means to rub, to massage, to anoint.
I’m asking, do Jews massage dead bodies after three
days? And the answer is no. I say to you Christians, do you
massage dead bodies after three days? Do you? The answer is
no. We Muslims are the closest to the Jew in our ceremony of
law. Do Muslims massage dead bodies after three days? The
answer is no. Then why would they want to go and massage a
dead, rotten body after three days? Within three hours, you
know that rigor mortis sets in, the hardening of the cells,
the rotting of the body, fermentation from within. In three
days’ time the body is rotten from inside. Such a rotting
body when you massage it falls to pieces.
Why would she want to go and massage a dead, rotten body
unless she was looking for a live person? You see, according
to your witnesses, from only reading, she must have seen
signs of life in the limp body as it was being taken down
from the cross. She was about the only woman who, with
Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus, had given the final rites
to the body of Jesus. All his other disciples had forsaken
Him and fled. They were not there. So if this woman had seen
signs of life, she was not going to shout, “There, He’s
alive! He’s alive!” – to invite a sure death.
Three days later, she goes in, and she wants to anoint
Him. And when she reaches the sepulchre, she finds that the
stone is removed. The winding sheets are inside. So, she
starts to cry. I’m asking, why was the stone removed and why
were the winding sheets unwound? Because for a resurrected
body you won’t have to remove the stone to come out. For the
resurrected body, you don’t have to unwind the winding
sheets to move, This is the need of this physical body. This
mortal body. Because a poet tells us, “The stone walls do
not a prison make nor iron bars a cage,” For the soul, for
the spirit, these things do not matter. Iron bars or walls.
It’s the need of His physical body. Jesus Christ, according
to the Scriptures, was watching her from wherever He was,
not from heaven, but from this earth.
Because this tomb, if you remember, was privately owned
property belonging to Joseph of Arimathea. This very rich,
influential disciple had carved out of a rock a big, roomy
chamber. Around that chamber was his vegetable garden. Now,
don’t tell me that this Jew was so generous that he was
planting vegetables five miles out of town for other
people’s sheep and goats to graze upon. Surely he must have
bought his laborers quarters. Or for people who looked after
his garden, or perhaps his country home where he went with
his family for holidays, on the weekends.
Jesus is there and He watches this woman. He knows who
she is and He knows why she’s there. And He goes up to her.
He finds her crying. So He says, “Woman, why weepest thou?
Whom seekest thou?” I’m asking, doesn’t He know? Doesn’t He
know? Why does He ask such a silly question? I’m telling
you, this is not a silly question. He’s actually pulling her
leg, metaphorically. She, supposing Him to be the gardener –
I’m only reading you evidence as it is given. She supposed
Him to be the gardener – I am asking, why does she suppose
He’s a gardener? Do resurrected bodies look like gardeners?
Do they? I say, why does she suppose He’s a gardener? I’m
telling you, because He’s disguised as a gardener. Why is He
disguised as a gardener? I say, because He’s afraid of the
Jews. Why is He afraid of the Jews? I say, because He didn’t
die. And He didn’t conquer death. If He had died, and if He
had conquered death, there’s no need to be afraid anymore.
Why not? Because the resurrected body can’t die twice. Who
says so? I say the Bible. What does it say? It says it is
ordained unto all men, once to die, and after that, the
judgment. You can’t die twice.
So, if He had conquered death, there would be no need to
be afraid. He’s afraid, because He didn’t die, So she,
supposing Him to be the gardener, says, “Sir, if you have
taken Him hence, tell me where have you laid Him to rest?”
To relax, to recuperate, not where have you buried Him. “So
that I might take him away.” I alone .- one woman a frail
Jewess. Imagine her carrying away a corpse of 160 pounds, at
least, not 200 like me. A muscular carpenter supposed to be
a young man in the prime of His life, at least 160 pounds.
And another 100 pounds’ worth of medicines around Him, John,
chapter 19, verse 9. That makes Him 260.
Can you imagine this frail Jewess carrying this bundle
of a corpse over 260 pounds, like a bundle of straw, like a
super-woman in the American comics? And take Him where? Take
Him home? Put Him under a bed – what does she want to do
with Him? Does she want to pickle Him? What does she want to
do with a rotting body. I ask you?
So Jesus – the joke has gone too far – says, “Mary…”
The way He said “Mary,” she recognized that this was Jesus.
So, she wants to grab Him. I’m asking why. To bite Him? No!
To pay respect. We Eastern people do that. She wants to grab
Him. So Jesus says, “Touch Me not,” I say, why not? Is He a
bundle of electricity, a dynamo, that if she touches Him she
will get electrocuted? Tell me, why not? I say be- cause it
hurts, You give me another reason why not, “Touch Me not for
I am not yet ascended unto My Father.” Is she blind? Can’t
she see the man is standing there beside her? What does He
mean by “I’m not gone up” when He is here? He said, “I am
not yet ascended unto My Father.” In the language of the
Jew, in the idiom of the Jew. He’s saying, “I am not dead
yet.”
The problem arises: who moved the stone? How could she
get to Him; who moved the stone? And the Christians are
writing books upon books. One is Frank Morrison, a
rationalist lawyer, He writes a book of 192 pages and he
gives six hypotheses, At the end of the 192 pages, when you
are finished, you still haven’t got the answer. Who moved
the stone? And they’re writing books upon books: who moved
the stone? I can’t understand why you can’t see the very
obvious. Why don’t you read your books: These gospels, you
have it in black and white in your own mother tongue. This
is an anomaly that you read this book in your own mother
tongue.
The Englishman in English, the Afrikaner in Afrikaans
the Zulu in Zulu. Every language group has got the book in
their own language. And each and every one is made to
understand the exact opposite of what he is reading. Exact
opposite. Not just merely misunderstanding.
I want you to prove me wrong. I’m telling you … I’m
only quoting word for word exactly as your witnesses have
said it. Preserved it for us in black and white. I’m not
attributing motives to them. I’m not saying that they are
dishonest witnesses. I’m telling you. Please read this book
of yours once more. Remove the blinders, and read it again.
And tell me where I’m not understanding your language. You
Englishmen, or you Afrikaners, you Zulu. You come back to me
and if you feel that at the end of the talk. our honored
visitor has not done justice to the subject, you call me –
to your Kingdom Halls or to your school hall or anywhere you
want to discuss it further with me. I am prepared to come.
Who moved the stone? I’m asking. It’s very simple – they’re
talking about 20 men required. It is so huge, it needed a
superman from America to move it. One and a half to two
tons. I’m telling you, please read Mark and Matthew and he
tells you that Joseph of Arimathea alone, put the stone into
place. One man – alone. One man! If one man can put it into
place, why can’t two persons remove it, I ask you? Now, all
those happenings – you know that this was prophesied. It was
ordained. And all the stories about what happened afterward
- I’m telling you that Jesus Christ had given you a clear
cut indication of what was going to happen. And that’s also
preserved in black and white in your testimony in the Gospel
of St. Matthew, another of your witnesses, chapter 12.
verses 38. 39 and 40. The Jews come again to Jesus. with a
new request. Now they say. “Master, we would have a sign of Thee.” We
want You to show a miracle to convince us that You are the
Messiah we are waiting for. You know, something supernatural
like walking on the water, or flying in the air like a bird.
Do something, man, then we will be convinced that You are a
man of God, the Messiah we are waiting for. So Jesus answers
them. He says, “An evil and adulterous generation seeketh
after a sign. But there shall be no sign given unto it,
except the sign of the prophet Jonah. For as Jonah was three
days and three nights in the belly of the whale, so shall
the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the belly
of the earth.” The only sign He was prepared to give them
was the sign of Jonah. He has put all his eggs in one
basket. He didn’t say, “You know blind Bartimaeus, I healed
him. You know that woman with issues who had been bleeding
for years. She touched Me and she was healed. You know, I
fed five thou- sand people with a few pieces of fish and a
few pieces of bread. You see that fig tree. I dried it up
from its very roots.” Nothing of the kind. “This is the only
sign I will give you, the sign of Jonah.” I’m asking, what
was that sign? Well, go to the book of Jonah. I brought the book of
Jonah for you – one page by God – it is only one page in the
whole Bible. This is the book of Jonah. Four short chapters.
It won’t take you two minutes to read it. It’s hard to find
the book because, in a thousand pages, to find one page is
difficult. But, you don’t have to go there. If you went to
Sunday school. you will remember what I’m telling you. I’m
telling you that Jonah was sent to the Ninevites. You know,
God Almighty told him, “Go to Nineveh,” a city of 100,000
people. He was to warn them that they must repent in
sack-cloth and ashes; they must humble themselves before the
Lord. Jonah was despondent because these materialistic
people -worldly people – “They will not listen to me. They
will make a mockery of what I have to tell them.” So instead
of going to Nineveh, he goes to Joppa. That’s what this
one-page book tells you. He went to Joppa and was taken
aboard a ship – he was going to Tarshish. You don’t have to
remember the names. On the way, there’s a storm. And according to the
superstitions of these people, anyone who runs away from his
master’s command, who fails to do his duty, creates a
turmoil at sea. So, they begin to question in the boat, who
could be responsible for this storm. Jonah realizes that as
a prophet of God, he is a soldier of God. And as a soldier
of God, he has no right to do things presumptuously on his
own. So he says, “Look, I am the guilty party. God Almighty
is after my blood. He wants to kill me, so in the process
He’s sinking the boat, and you innocent people will die. It
will be better for you if you take me and you throw me
overboard. Because God is really after my blood.” They say, “No, man, you know, you are such a good man.
Perhaps you want to commit suicide. We won’t help you to do
that. We have a sys- tem of our own of discovering right
from wrong,” and that is what they call casting lots. Like
heads or tails. So, according to the sys- tem of casting
lots, Jonah was found to be the guilty man. And so they took
him, and they threw him overboard. Now I’m going to ask you a question. When they threw him
overboard. was he dead or was he alive? Now, before you
answer. I want you to bear in mind that Jonah had
volunteered. He said, “Throw me.” And when a man volunteers,
you don’t have to strangle him before throwing, you don’t
have to spear him before throwing, you don’t have to break
his arm or limb before throwing. You agree with me? The man had volunteered. So when they threw him
overboard, what does your common sense say? Was he dead or
was he alive? Please, I want your help. Was he dead or was
he alive? Alive. You get no prize for that – it was too
simple a question. And – astonishingly the Jews say that he
was alive, the Christians say he was alive and the Mus- lims
say he was alive. How much nicer it would be if we would
agree on every other thing. We all agree that he was alive when he was thrown into
that raging sea. And the storm subsided. Perhaps it was a
coincidence. A fish comes and gobbles him. Dead or alive?
Was he dead or was he alive? Alive? Thank you very much. From the fish’s belly, according to the book of Jonah,
he cries to God for help. Do dead men pray? Do they pray?
Dead people, do they pray? No! So he was alive. Three days
and three nights the fish takes him around the ocean. Dead
or alive? Alive. On the third day, walking on the seashore,
I’m asking – dead or alive? Alive. What does Jesus say? He
said, “For as Jonah was.” Just like Jonah. “For as Jonah
was, so shall the Son of Man be,” referring to Himself. How
was Jonah – dead or alive? Alive. How was Jesus for three
days and three nights in the tomb according to the Christian
belief? How was He? Dead or alive? Dead. He was dead according to our belief. In other words,
He’s unlike Jonah. Can’t you see? He says, I shall be like
Jonah and you are tell- ing me – there’s one thousand two
hundred million Christians of the world – that He was unlike
Jonah. He said, I will be like Jonah, you say He was unlike
Jonah. If I was a Jew, I would not accept Him as my Messiah.
I am told in the Qur’an that Jesus was the Messiah. I
accept. He was one of the mightiest messengers of God – I
accept. I believe in His miraculous birth. I believe that He
gave life to the dead by God’s permission. And He healed
those born blind and the leper by God’s permission. But if I
was a Jew, according to the sign that He has given, He
failed. Jonah is alive – Jesus is dead. They are not alike.
I don’t know in what language you can make them alike – that
they are like one another. So the clever man. you know, the
doctor of theology, the professor of religion, he tells me
that I don’t under- stand the Bible. Your Bible, I don’t understand. Why don’t I understand
the Bible? He says, “You see Mr. Deedat, Jesus Christ is
emphasizing the time fac- tor.” Note, He uses the word
“three” four times. For Jonah was three days and three
nights. so shall the Son of Man be three days and three
nights. He uses the word “three” four times. In other words,
He’s emphasizing the time factor – not whether He was dead
or alive. I’m tellinq you that there is nothing miraculous
in a time factor, Whether the man was dead for three minutes
or three hours or three weeks, that’s not a miracle. The miracle, if there is one at all, is that you expect
a man to be dead and he’s not dead. When Jonah was thrown
into the sea, we expect him to die. He didn’t die, so it’s a
miracle. A fish comes and gobbles him – he ought to die. He
didn’t die, so it’s a miracle. Three days and three nights
of suffocation and heat in the whale’s belly, He ought to
die: he didn’t die. It’s a miracle, it’s a miracle because
you expect a man to die and he didn’t die. When you expect a man to die, and if he dies, what’s so
miraculous about that? I ask you, what’s miraculous about
that? If a gunman took a gun and fired six shots into the
heart of a man and he dies, is that a miracle? No. But if he
laughs it off. if he is still alive and walking with us and
if, after the six shots tear his heart to pieces, he laughs:
ha ha ha ha — he’s alive. So we say it’s a miracle. Can’t
you see? The miracle is when we expect a man to die and he
doesn’t die. When the man who is expected to die, dies, it’s
no miracle. We expect Jesus also to die. For what He had been
through, if He died, there is no miracle. There’s no sign.
If He didn’t die, it’s a miracle – can’t you see? So He
says, “No, no. It is the time factor.” Drowning men clutch
at straws – drowning women do the same. He says, “No. it’s
the time factor.” I say, did He fulfill that? He says, “Of
course, He fulfilled that.” I say, how did He fulfill it?
Look, it’s very easy to make statements. HOW did He fulfill
it? I say, watch. When was He crucified, I ask you? The
whole Christian world says on Good Friday. Britain, France,
Germany. America, Lesotho. Zambia – in South Africa we have
a public holiday – every Christian nation commemorates Good
Friday. I am asking, what makes Good Friday good? So the Christian says, “Christ died for our sins, That
makes it good.” So He was crucified on the Good Friday. He
says, yes. Yes. I say, when was He crucified – morning or
afternoon? So the Christian says in the afternoon. How long
was He on the cross? Some say three hours, some say six
hours. I say, I am not going to argue with you. Whatever you
say, I accept. You know, when we read the Scriptures, they
tell us that when they wanted to crucify Jesus, they were in
a hurry. And they were in such a hurry that Josh tells us in
his book, The Resurrection Factor, that within some 12
hours, there were six separate trials. Six trials He went
through. These things only happen in films. These sort of things - six trials in 12 hours from midnight to the next morning
and on, only take place on films. But I believe whatever you
tell me. Whatever you tell me, I accept. So the Jews were in
a hurry to put Him up on the cross. Do you know why? Because
of the general public. Jesus was a Jew. The general public
loved Him. The man had healed the blind and the lepers and
the sick and had raised the dead. He had fed so many
thousands of people with bread and fish. He was a hero, and
if they discovered – the general public – that their hero’s
life was in danger, there would have been a riot. So, they
had a midnight trial. Early in the morning they took Him to
Pilate. Pilate says, “He is not my kettle of fish – take Him
to Herod.” Herod says, “I’m not interested – take Him back
to Pilate. And hurry, hurry, hurry.” And they held six
trials within 12 hours. Six. As if they had nothing else to
do, but I believe what you tell me. They succeeded in
putting Him up on the cross, according to your witnesses. According to your witnesses. But as much as they were in
a hurry to put Him up, they were in a hurry to bring Him
down. You know why? Because at sunset on Friday, at six
o’clock, the Sabbath starts. You see, the Jews count the
days, night and day, night and day. We Muslims count our
days, night and day, night and day. Not day and night. We
count night and day. Six o’clock, our day begins in the
evening. So, before sunset, the body must come down because
they were told in the book of Deuteronomy that they must see
to it that nobody is hanging on the tree on the Sabbath day.
“That thy land be not defiled which the Lord thy God giveth
thee for an inheritance.” So quickly, quickly, they brought
the body down and they gave Him a burial bath, and they put
a hundred pounds of medicine around Him. And they put Him
into the the book of Deuteronomy that they must see to it
that nobody is hanging on the tree on the Sabbath day. “That
thy land be not defiled which the Lord thy God giveth thee
for an inheritance.” So quickly, quickly, they brought the
body down and they gave Him a burial bath, and they put a
hundred pounds of medicine around Him. And they put Him into
the sepulchre. Not a grave – a sepulchre. A big, roomy
chamber above ground. So it’s already evening. From three
o’clock in the afternoon, for whatever you do, the details
are given in Josh’s book. Burial baths normally take more
than an hour. You read the details about how the Jew give a
burial bath to the dead. That takes more than an hour
itself. But let’s say they succeeded in doing all these
things in a hurry, hurry. You know they were in a hurry. Six
trials in 12 hours. Now they put Him into the sepulchre.
By the time they put Him in, it’s already evening. So watch
- watch my fingers. Friday night He’s supposed to be in the
grave. Watch my finger. Saturday day, He still is supposed
to be in the grave. Am I right? Saturday night, He still is
supposed to be in the grave. But Sunday morning, the first
day of the week, when Mary Magdalene goes to the tomb, the
tomb was empty.
That’s what your witnesses say. I am asking – how many days
and how many nights? You remember, I said, supposed,
supposed, supposed… You know why? Because the Bible
doesn’t say actually when He came out. He could have come
out Friday night. The Bible doesn’t say how He came. So,
Friday night, Saturday day, Saturday night. I’m asking, how
many days and how many nights? Please, if you can see, if
your eyes are not defective, tell me how many? How many do
you see? Right! Two nights and a day. Look at this. Is it
the same as He said, for as Jonah was three days and three
nights, so shall the Son of Man be three days and three
nights? Three and three. Look at this: two and one. Please
tell me now it means the same thing.
I want to know what you are reading. I want to know what you
are reading in your own book! The man is telling you that
what is going to happen will be like Jonah. And the sign of
Jonah is a miracle. And the only miracle you can attribute
to this man, Jonah, is that we expected him to die and he
didn’t die. Jesus – we expect Him also to die. If He died,
it is not a sign. If He didn’t die, it is a sign.
Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen of the jury. Can you
see, the people have been programmed. We all get programmed
from childhood. When I went to America, and spoke at the
University in San Francisco, I said you people are
brainwashed. I told them, “You are brainwashed.” Of course,
I could afford to talk to them – the American will take it.
He is the almighty. You know, great guy. He can take it. So
I said, “You people are brainwashed.” So one American, a
professor, interjected, “No, not brainwashed – programmed.”
I said, “I beg your pardon – programmed.” So, Mr. Chairman,
ladies and gentlemen, I hope, by the time this meeting is
over, you will be re-programmed into reading the book as it
is, and not as you are made to understand.
Thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen.
# Josh McDowell
Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon. Mr. Deedat, and
the wonderful people of this city, and this country of South
Africa, I am thankful for the opportunity to be a part of
this symposium on Islam and Christianity’s view of the
crucifixion and the resurrection.
In preparation for this, I didn’t realize that I would
be dealing with so many different theories on the
crucifixion from the Islamic viewpoint. I found out, first
of all, that the majority of the Muslims throughout the
world hold to the substitutionary theory. That in Surah
number 4, in the Qur’an, a substitute, another person, was
placed in Christ’s position on the cross that Jesus was
removed and taken to heaven.
In other words, it was someone else. But then, I found
such a diverse opinion among Muslims. Some Muslim writers
say that it was a disciple of Jesus who was placed on the
cross in His stead. Another Muslim writer, Tabari, quoting
Ibn Ishaq, said it was a man by the name of Sargus, or
Sergius, who was placed on the cross. Another Muslim writer
by the name of Baidawi, said it was a Jew named Titanus who
was placed on the cross. Another, Ath-Tha-‘labi, says it was
a Jew named Fal Tayanus, who was placed on the cross. And
still another Muslim writer. Wahb ibn Munabbah, said it was
a Rabbi of the Jews, Ashyu, who was placed on the cross.
Then, others feeling that it might be a little unfair to
put an innocent man there, say, well, it must be Judas
Iscariot who was placed on the cross. Now, Mr. Deedat might
be able to correct me, but I do not believe there is any
evidence whatsoever in the Qur’an for that. There are in
some of the sects. earlier than Islam, references to that.
But I always wondered, why did God have to have a
substitute? Why couldn’t He have simply taken Jesus then?
Others will say – and this is not what the majority of
Muslims believe – that Jesus died a natural death some years
after the crucifixion and the alleged resurrection. In other
words, “Hazrat Isa,” Jesus is dead! This is a more recent
development in Islam. And I’m always wary of recent
developments.
It was started mainly by a man by the name of Venturini,
who said Jesus really didn’t die on the cross – He just
swooned or passed out, then was put into a tomb and
resuscitated. This is also the theme of the Ahmadiyas, a
radical sect of Islam. One of their main doctrines,
established by their founder and allegedly their prophet,
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, it is a part of the doctrine of
Qadianism.
Some will say to be crucified means to die. Therefore,
Jesus wasn’t crucified because He did not die on the cross.
I’m not quite sure how they got that definition. What I need
to do is this: present the facts to you, as I have been able
to document them in my books, and then let you, as fair
minded, intelligent people, make up your minds. The
background for the points I’m going to make is that when I
was in the University, I wanted to write a book against
Christianity. I wanted to refute it intellectually. The last
thing I wanted to do was become a Christian. But after two
years of research and spending a lot of money and time, I
discovered facts – not only facts that God has stated in His
Holy Word, the Bible, but facts that are documented in
sources in history. Men and women, these are some of the
facts that I found as I tried to refute Christianity and I
couldn’t.
The first fact I found is that Jesus was not afraid to
die. In fact, He predicted His own death and resurrection.
He said, “Behold, we are going up to Jerusalem.” He said to
His disciples, “The Son of Man is going to be delivered up
to the death. And they will deliver Him to the Gentiles to
mock and to whip and to crucify Him. And on the third day He
will be raised up” (paraphrased from Matthew 17:22-23).
In another place He began to teach them that He had
discovered many things. And then He said He’d be rejected by
the elders and the chief priests and the scribes, He would
be killed, and He added that after three days, He was to
rise again (Matthew 20:18, 19).
In Matthew 17, Jesus said to them, “The Son of Man is
going to be delivered into the hands of men, and they will
kill Him, and He will be raised again on the third day.”
The second thing I learned as I studied the life of
Jesus Christ is that Jesus was willing to die. In Matthew
26, He said, “My Father, if it is possible, let this Cup
pass from Me.” But what a lot of people leave out is the
context of what Jesus said. He said, “Yet not as I will, but
as Thou wilt, Father” (Matthew 26:39).
Now Jesus did not hide Himself. He is very clear about
where He is. It says in John 18 that He went to the place
where they usually found Him. He didn’t want to hide from
the authorities. He knew what was going to happen. In John
18, verse 4, it says, “Jesus therefore. knowing all the
things that were going to come upon Him.” He knew it! And He
was ready for it. In Matthew Jesus says, “Don’t you
understand, I could call on twelve legions of angels to
protect Me?” But He said, “I want Your will. Father.” and
God answered His prayer and let Him fulfill “the will of the
Father.” Jesus said in John 10: “The Father loves Me because
I lay down My life that I may take it up again. No one has
taken it away from Me, but I lay it down on My own
initiative.” You have to remember – Jesus being the God-Man,
came as God the Son, the eternal Word, to take the sins of
the world upon Himself. The Holy Bible (I Corinthians 5:21)
says that He, God, made Jesus sin for us, and, if you can,
imagine the agony that the eternal Word, the Son, was going
through at that time.
The third fact that I learned is that the Jews were not
guilty of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. I was very
surprised. Mr. Deedat, that you needed to be the defender of
the Jews. There are Muslims and Christians that have gotten
that distorted all through history. Jesus said in Matthew
- verses 18 and 19, “We are going up to Jerusalem, and
they will condemn Me to death. and will deliver Me over to
the Gentiles, to mock and whip and crucify Me.” Jesus said,
“I lay down My life.” If anyone was guilty, Jesus was. He
said, “I have the power to lay it down, I have the power to
take it up.” Also, Mr. Deedat, I feel that both you and I are
responsible, because the Bible says,”For all have sinned and
fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23). It was our
sins that drove Jesus Christ to the cross. The fourth fact that I learned is that the Christians
are called to an intelligent. intellectual faith – not a
blind faith. I was quite surprised when I read in the little
booklet, What Was the Sign of Jonah? by Mr. Ahmed Deedat,
that over one thousand million Christians today blindly
accept that Jesus of Nazareth is the Christ. I’m a little
confused, because really, Mr. Deedat, you read from the
Qur’an and you said you accept it, you don’t need facts, you
don’t need any evidence. You simply accept it and then
you’re saying that Christians, because they accept what God,
Yahweh, has revealed through the Holy Bible, that Jesus is
the Christ, that because we accept that, we do it blindly.
I’m amazed, because in the Muslim book, the Qur’an, it
states that one of the titles given to Jesus is “al-Masih.”
I believe it is referred to 11 times that way. The Muslim
translator of the Qur’an into English, Yusuf Ali, translates
the Arabic here as “Christ” in the English translation. So,
why are we accused of being blind in accepting Jesus as the
Christ? In my country, one of the greatest legal minds that ever
lived – the man who made the university of Harvard famous –
was Dr. Simon Greenleaf. He became a Christian through
trying to refute Jesus Christ as the Eternal Word and the
resurrection. Finally, after trying to do it, he came to the
conclusion that the resurrection of Jesus Christ is one of
the best established events of history, according to the
laws of legal evidence administered in the courts of
justice. C.S. Lewis, the literary genius of our age, was the
professor of medieval and renaissance literature at Oxford.
He was a giant in his field. No one could question his
intellectual capabilities. He became a believer in Jesus
Christ as his Savior and Lord when he tried to refute the
reliability of the New Testament and he couldn’t. And he
said, “I was one of the most reluctant converts, but I was
brought to Jesus Christ because of my mind.” Lord Caldecote, the Lord Chief Justice of England, a man
that held the highest offices that anyone could hold in the
legal systems of England, said, ” … as often as I have
tried to examine the evidence for Christianity, I have come
to believe it as a fact beyond dispute.” Thomas Arnold was the headmaster of a major varsity and
university for 14 years. He is an historian and the author
of the famous three- volume series, the History of Rome. He
said, “I know of no one fact in the history of mankind which
is proved by better and fuller evidence than the
resurrection of Jesus Christ.” Dr. Werner von Braun, the German scientist – the man who
immigrated to my country – was one of the creators of the
American Space Program. He said he never really became a
scientist until he came to know Jesus Christ personally as
Savior and God. The fifth fact that I discovered was the historical
accuracy of the Christian Bible. The Christian New Testament
is exceptional in its reliability and trustworthiness and
survival down through history. It is unrivaled in manuscript
authority. A manuscript is a hand-written copy over against
a printed copy. Men and women, of the Christian New
Testament alone, there are more than 24,000 manuscripts. Not
versions of the Bible, Mr. Deedat, manuscript copies. Men
and women, the number two book in all of history in
manuscript authority and literature, is Homer’s Iliad, with - The number two book in the whole of history in
manuscript authority. Then, Sir Frederick Kenyon was a man who was second to
no one in the ability and the training to make authoritative
statements about manuscripts of literature in history. The
former curator and director of the British Museum, he said,
“The last foundation for any doubt that the Scriptures have
come down to us as they were written now has been removed.
Both the authenticity and the general integrity of the books
of the New Testament may now be regarded as finally
established.” The point: there are some people who do not have an
historical perspective of literature, who try to make an
issue out of the fact that the writers of the four accounts
of the gospel, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, never signed
their names. Please, men and women, we need to go back
through history and see how they did it then. First of all, the manuscripts were so well-accepted as
being authoritative, with everyone knowing who wrote them,
they did not need names placed on them. You might say it was
the writers’ way of not distracting from the purpose of
making Jesus Christ the central issue. Also, the work of
these authors, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, went through
the apostolic age. They went through the test of the
apostolic period of the first century to confirm their
accuracy, authenticity and reliability. Other people,
through limited reading and absence of any type of research,
say that the documents of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are
hearsay because the writers were not eyewitnesses of the
events surrounding the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus
Christ. The people who say that will often appeal to Mark 14:50.
They say that within two minutes they could dismiss the
argument because Jesus’ followers all left Him and fled. So
therefore, everything was hearsay. Men and women. this line
of reasoning ignores common sense in the facts of the case.
For example, read just the next four verses. It says this:
“And Peter followed Him.” You see, they left Him in a group,
but they came back individually – immediately, Mr. Deedat. Verse 4 says: “And Peter followed Him at a distance.” He
went right into the courtyard of the high priest. And he was
sitting there with the officer. Can you imagine? With the
officers, and warming himself. In Mark 14, it says, “And
Peter was below, in the courtyard.” Men and women, if you
have studied the Scriptures, you’ll realize that Mark, in
his gospel, was writing down all the eyewitness accounts of
Peter. Peter was right there. Then we go to John 18, verse
15: “And Simon Peter was following Jesus, and so was another
disciple. Now that disciple was known to the high priest and
entered with Jesus into the court of the high priest.” John
19:26, “When Jesus therefore saw His mother, and the
disciple whom He loved standing nearby, He said to His
mother, ‘Woman, behold your son.’ ” They were eyewitnesses.
They were there. About being permissible in a court of law. In most legal
situations, you have what can be referred to as an ancient
document rule. Now, you have to go to law to substantiate
these things. Dr. John Warwick Montgomery is a lawyer and
dean of the Simon Greenleaf School of Law, and a lecturer at
the International School of Theology and Law in Strasbourg,
France. He said that the application of the ancient document
rule to the documents of the New Testament (especially the
four gospels) – this is a head of a law school speaking –
“Applied to the gospel records, and reinforced by
responsible lower (textual) criticism, this rule would
establish competency in any court of law.” The greatest eyewitness testimony is not found in the
gospels. It is found in I Corinthians, the epistle by the
apostle Paul, chapter 15, and was written in A.D. 55 to 56.
I have yet to find a reputable scho- lar who would deny
that. Paul says (now it’s 20 years earlier, right after his
conversion – he had met with the leaders. He had met with
James, the brother of Jesus in Jerusalem), that the
tradition was passed on to him that there were over 500
eyewitnesses of the resur- rection. If you take that into a
court of law, give each eyewitness just six minutes, that
would make 3,000 minutes of eyewitness testi- mony, or 50
hours of eyewitness testimony. However, that’s not the key point here. That was the
tradition handed down to him, what he had examined
personally. But Paul says then, the majority of them are
still alive right now. Not when the tradition was passed
down, but right now. Men and women, Paul was saying, “If you
don’t believe me, ask them.” Also, many people overlook the fact that when the
message of Jesus Christ was presented by the apostles and
disciples, and the New Testament was shared, present in the
audience were hostile and antagonistic witnesses. If they
would have dared to depart from the truth of what was said,
there were hostile witnesses to correct them immediate- ly.
In a court of law that is referred to as the principle of
cross- examination. They did not dare to depart from the
truth. Also, apart from the Bible, you have several extra
biblical secular sources. One, a man by the name of Polycarp, was a disciple of
the apostle John. He writes in his works. going back almost
2.000 years ago, “So firm is the ground upon which these
gospels rest, that even the here- tics themselves would not
undermine it.” They had to start from what was presented and
then develop their own heresy. Because even then, they could
not say, Jesus didn’t say that. Jesus didn’t do that then…
they couldn’t do that. So, they had to start with what He
said, and develop their own heresy. The conclusion of many scholars is a tremendous
confidence in the Christian Bible. Mr. Millar Burrows was on
the staff of Yale University. one of the most prestigious
universities in my country. He said. “There is an increase
of confidence in the accurate transmission of the text of
the New Testament itself.” Dr. Howard Vox, a researcher and
archaeologist, said, “From the standpoint of literary
evidence, the only logical conclusion is in the case where
the reliability of the New Testament is infinitely stronger
than any other record of antiquity.” The sixth fact that I discovered was that Christ was
crucified. What does the historical, reliable record show?
It is clear, not only from the Christian’s biblical
historical record, but also from secular sources, which are
documented in the back of my book, Evidence That Demands a
Verdict, that He not only predicted His death by
crucifixion, but that He was actually crucified. Jesus said
that He would be whipped and delivered over to be crucified.
And then. in John 19:17. 18, “They took Jesus therefore, and
He went out, bearing His own cross, to the place called the
Place of a Skull…. There they crucified Him, and with Him
two other men, one on either side, and Jesus in between.” Let’s follow through what actually happened. First of
all, it points out that Jesus was whipped by the Romans.
What did that mean? The Romans would strip a person down to
the waist and would tie him in the courtyard. Then they
would take a whip that had a handle about a foot and a half
long. At the end of the handle, it had four leather thongs
with heavy, jagged bones or balls of lead with jagged edges,
wound into the end of the straps. A minimum of five. They
would be different lengths. The Romans would bring the whip
down over the back of the individual and all the balls of
lead or bone would hit the body at the same time. and they
they would yank the whip down. The Jews would only permit 40
lashes. So they never did more than 39 so they wouldn’t
break the law if they miscounted. The Romans could do as
many as they wanted. So, when the Romans whipped a Jew, they
did 41 or more out of spite to the Jews. And so he had
probably at least 41, if not more, lashes. There are several medical authorities that have done
research on crucifixion. One is a Dr. Barbet, in France, and
another is Dr. C. Truman Davis, in the state of Arizona in
my country. He is a medical doctor who has done meticulous
study of the crucifixion from a medical perspective. Here he
gives the effect of the Roman flogging: “The heavy whip is brought down with full force again
and again across (a person’s) shoulders, back and legs. At
first, the heavy thongs cut through the skin only. Then, as
the blows continue, they cut deeper into the subcutalleous
tissues, producing first an oozing of blood from the
capillaries and veins of the skin, and finally spur- ting
arterial bleeding from vessels in the underlying muscles.
The small balls of lead first produce large, deep bruises,
which the others cut wide open. Finally, the skin of the
back is hanging in long ribbons, and the entire area is an
unrecognizable mass of torn, bleed- ing tissue.” Other sources I have documented said that sometimes the
back is literally opened up to the bowels within. Many
people would die just from the whipping. After the whipping they took Jesus out to the execution
area and drove spikes into His wrists and His feet. It says
that late that Friday afternoon they broke the legs of the
two thieves hanging with Jesus, but they did not break His
legs. Now, why did they break someone’s legs? When you are
prostrate on the cross, or hanging there, they bent the legs
up underneath and drove the spike through here. When you
died by crucifixion, often what would happen is you would
die from your own air. The pectoral muscles would be
affected and you could not let your air out. You could take
it in, but could not let it out. And so, you’d hang there and suffocate, you would push
up on your legs to let the air out, and then come down to
take it in. When they wanted to bring about the death
immediately, they broke their legs and they couldn’t push
up, and they would die. Jesus’ legs were not broken. As the
Holy God, revealing His Holy Word in the Bible, points out,
Jesus had died. Men and women, if they had broken His legs,
He would not have been our Messiah. He would not have been
the Eternal Word, because God, Yahweh in the Old Testament,
prophesies in Psalms that His legs would not be broken. His
bones would not be broken. Men and women, He was fulfilling
what God, Yahweh, had already revealed would take place. The next fact that I discovered was that Christ was
dead. That’s the seventh fact that I discovered, Men and
women, in John 19:30, Jesus willed Himself to die, That’s
why He didn’t take so long, He came to die. He said, “I lay
My life down.” And in John 19, He said, “It is finished,”
and He bowed His head and He gave up the Spirit, He willed
Himself to die, Now, in John 19, verse 34 (Mr. Deedat, in
his booklet, has referred to it as ‘Evidence That Jesus Was
Not Dead’) you have reference to the blood and water. He was on the cross and they’d already acknowledged Him
being dead, but they thought they’d give a parting shot, as
you would say, They took a spear, and thrust it into His
side. Eyewitness accounts said blood and water came out
separated, Mr. Deedat, in his book, appealed to this
phenomenon as evidence that Christ was still alive, He
supports this in his writing, by an appeal to an article in
the Thinkers Digest 1949, by an anesthesiologist. I was able
to acquire medical research by various people in this area. I have time to share just two of the findings. First,
from a scholastic viewpoint: many medical and university or
varsity libraries that once carried this journal, no longer
do so. It is considered by many in the medical field to be
not only out of date, but behind the medical times. Second, from a medical viewpoint: A wound of the type
inflicted on Jesus, if the person were still alive, would
not bleed out the wound opening, but bleed into the chest
cavity, causing an internal hemorrhage. At the aperture of
the wound, the blood would be barely oozing from the
opening, For a spear to form a perfect channel that would
allow the blood and serum to flow out the spear wound is
next to impossible. The massive internal damage done to a
person under crucifixion, and then being speared in the
heart area, would cause death almost immediately, not even
including what happens with the details of a Jew’s burial. At the State of Massachusetts General Hospital, over a
period of years, they did research on people who died of a
ruptured heart. Normally, the heart had 20 cc’s of
pericardial fluid. When a person dies of a ruptured heart,
there is more than 500 cc’s of pericardial fluid, And it
would come out in the form of a fluid and clotted blood.
Perhaps this is what was viewed at that time. The Jewish burial would have been a final death blow. Mr.
Deedat says in his book, page 9, in “What Was the Sign of
Jonah”? that they gave the Jewish burial bath, plastered him
with 100 pounds of aloe and myrrh. Now, going through
whipping, where the back is almost laid open, having your
arms and feet pierced, being put on a cross, having a spear
thrust in your side, being taken down and then plastered
with 100-some pounds of spices of cement consistency – it
would call for a greater miracle than the resurrection to
live through that, Then, the severe discipline of the Romans. Pilate was a
little amazed, and I would have been too, that Christ had
already been dead, or that they had come and asked for the
body, So, he called a centurion in. And he said, “I want you
to go and confirm to me that Jesus is dead.” Now men and
women, this centurion was not a fool. He was not about ready
to leave his wife a widow. The centurion would always check with four different
executioners. That was Roman law. There had to be four
executioners. They did that so in case one man was a little
lax, the other one would catch him in it, And you would
never have all four lax in signing the death warrant.
Discipline was severe with the Romans. For example, when the angel let Peter out of jail in
Acts 12 in the New Testament, Herod called in the guard and
executed them all – just for letting one man out of jail. In
Acts 16 in the Christian New Testament, the doors had been
opened up in the jail for Paul and Silas, their chains had
been loosened, and the moment the guard saw they were freed,
he pulled out his own sword to execute himself. And Paul
said, “Wait a minute!” You see, that guard knew what would
happen, He would rather die by his own sword, than be
executed by the Romans. Then Christ was dead. Flavius Josephus, the Jewish
historian, records that when he went into Jerusalem in A.D.
70 when Titus was destroying it, he saw three of his friends
being crucified. They had just been put up there. They had
been whipped and everything. He went to the commander of the
guard and he said, “Please release them.” Now, you have to
understand, Flavius was the name given to Josephus by the
Roman Emperor who had brought him into his own family.
That’s why he had influence as a Jew. And you know,
immediately, the Roman guard captain took the three men down
from the cross and still, men and women, two of the three
died. They’d just been put up there and they were removed
quickly. Crucifixion was that cruel. The Jews knew that Jesus was dead. In Matthew 27 they
went to the Roman leader and said, “Sir, we remember that
when He was still alive. ..” In other words, what is He now?
Dead! “When He was still alive He said, ‘After three days I
am to rise again.’ “I believe Mr. Deedat has his books
saying that the Jews realized they’d made a mistake. He
really wasn’t dead, so they thought they wouldn’t make a
second mistake, so they go and get a guard unit put there.
Well, the Jews themselves said He was already dead. “We just
want to make sure no one takes His body so there won’t be
any deception.” The Jews have been accused of a lot of
things, but very seldom have they ever been accused of
stupidity. They knew He was dead. The next fact I discovered was the burial procedure of
the Jews. Some people say they were hurrying because of the
Sabbath coming, and they had to carry Him back. Men and
women, I checked this out in detail. And I documented in my
Resurrection Factor book that the burial procedure was so
important they could even do it on the Sabbath. They didn’t
have to worry about the Sabbath coming up. They didn’t want
the body to hang on the cross once the Sabbath began, but
they could take their time burying Him. They would put
spices around the body – in this case, 100 pounds of
aromatic spices – along with a gummy, cement substance. They would stretch the body out or straighten it out.
They’d take a piece of linen cloth 30 centimeters wide. They
would start to wrap the body from the feet. In between the
folds, they put the cement consistency and the spices. They
wrapped the body to the armpits, put the arms down, started
below the fingers again, wrapped to the neck, and put a
separate piece around the head. In this situation, I would
estimate an encasement of 117 to 120 pounds. The next fact that I discovered is that they took
extreme security precautions at the tomb of Jesus Christ.
One, it says that they rolled large stone against the tomb.
Mark says the stone was extremely large. One historical
reference going back to the first century says that 20 men
could not move the stone. Now. I think it was exaggerated a
little bit there. But he was making a point about the size
of the stone. Two engineering professors. after they heard
me speak on the stone, went to Israel. As non-Christian
engineering professors, they calculated the size stone
needed to roll against a four-and-a-half to five-foot
doorway of the Jewish tombs. They wrote me a well-documented
letter, and said it would have to have a minimum weight of
one and a half to two tons. Mr. Deedat, in his books, makes an issue that one man,
or two at the most, rolled the stone against the entrance.
Therefore, one or two men could roll it back. It says Joseph
of Arimathea rolled the stone against the entrance. Don’t
force on the Bible or the Qur’an anything you would not
force in conversation today. For example: when I came to the
stadium the other day to look it over. I said to one of the
people that brought me here, “How did all these chairs get
here?” He said, “Mr. Deedat brought them.” Mr. Deedat, did
you bring all 700 of these chairs personally, yourself? No!
They were brought by many people. I could go away from here
saying Mr. Deedat put on this symposium. But I think there
were some others that helped make all the arrangements. History says Hitler invaded France. Now, maybe he would
have tried it in France alone, but I don’t think he would
try it in South Africa alone. There could have been a number of people that helped
Joseph of Arimathea. Plus, you find when you go back and
research it out that the tombs had a trough going up the
side. They placed the stone there. They had a block. Then,
men and women, my seven-year-old daughter could roll it,
because you simply pull up the block, letting the stone roll
down the front and lodge itself against the entrance of the
tomb. Then, a security guard was put there. The Jews wanted
one. They went to the Romans and said, give us a guard unit.
The Greek word was kustodia. Men and women, a kustodia was a
16-man security unit. Each man was trained to protect six
square feet of ground. The 16 men, according to Roman
history, were supposed to be able to protect 6 square yards
against an entire battalion and hold it. Each guard had four
weapons on his body. He was a fighting machine, almost the
same as was true of the Temple Police. Next, a Roman seal was placed on the tomb with a Roman
insignia. That seal stood for the power and the authority of
the Roman Empire. The body of Christ was encased with 100
and some pounds of cement and aromatic spices. A
one-and-a-half to two-ton stone was rolled against the
entrance: a 16-man security unit was placed there, and a
Roman seal. But something happened. It’s a matter of
historical record: after three days, the tomb was empty. I don’t have to debate that. Mr. Deedat agrees the tomb
was empty. So, I won’t waste any time here. The sign of Jonah – I’m so glad you brought that up. The
sign of Jonah – won’t take too much time there because I
don’t think it’s necessary in this sense. Whenever you study
something, you study it in the language and the culture of
that day. Now, you go back to the Jewish language, and the
Jewish culture of that day. Not today – not South African,
not Indian, not American. The Jewish-Israelite culture of
that day. Let’s see what three days and three nights mean. In
Esther, chapter 4, in the Old Testament of the Christian
Jewish Bible, it says there was a fast for three days and
three nights. But then. it went on, and it says they
completed the fast on the third day. You see. in Jewish
language, “after three days and three nights,” meant “to the
third day” or “on the third day.” Jesus said in Matthew
12:40 He would be buried for three days and three nights. In Matthew 20, Jesus said He would be raised up on the
third day – not after the third day. The Jews came to Jesus,
and they said in Matthew 27, verse 63, “Sir…that deceiver
said ‘After three days I am to rise again.'” So, they asked
for a Roman guard. Now watch the langu- age here.
“Therefore, give orders for the grave to be made secure
until the third day,” not after the third day. They knew
what Jesus said, three days and three nights, meant until
the third day, “lest His disciples come and steal Him away.” Friday before six o’clock they had three hours to bury
Him. It took less than an hour. The Jewish reckoning of time
in the Jewish Talmud and the Babylonian Jerusalem Talmud
(the commentaries of the Jews), said any part, an “onan” –
any part of the day is considered a full day. On Friday
before six o’clock by Jewish reckoning, any minute was one
day and one night. From Friday night at six o’clock to
Saturday at six o’clock, was another day and another night. Men and women, from Jewish reckoning – not ours – any
moment after six o’clock Saturday night is another day,
another night. We do the same thing in my country. If my son
was born one minute before midnight on December the 31st, on
my income taxes to my government, I could treat my son with
the same time principle as having been born at any time
during that one full year – 365 days and 365 nights. When the Roman guards failed in their duty, they were
automatically executed. One way they were executed was they
were stripped of their clothes and burned alive in a fire
started with their own clothes. The seal was broken. Men and
women, when that seal was broken, the security forces were
thrown into finding that man or men, and when they were
found, anyone breaking that seal was condemned to
crucifixion upside down. The stone was removed, men and women, and I’ll ask Mr.
Deedat to check it out carefully. The revealed Word of God
in the Christian New Testament, in the original Greek (as
the Qur’an is in Arabic, the New Testament is in Greek),
points out that a one-and-a-half- to two-ton stone was
rolled up a slope, away from not just the entrance, but away
from the entire tomb, looking like it had been picked up and
carried away. Now, if they wanted to tip-toe in, move the
stone over, and help Jesus out, why all the efforts to move
a one-and a-half to two-ton stone up away from the entire
sepulchre? That guard unit would have had to have been
sleeping with cotton in their ears and with earmuffs on not
to have heard that one. Then, Mary went to the tomb in John 20. Mr. Deedat says
that she went there to anoint the body and that the word
“anoint” means “to massage.” Well, let me tell you, if
that’s true – it’s not – but if it were true, and that’s the
way the Muslims do it, it would have killed Jesus. If I went
through crucifixion, had my hands and feet pierced, my back
laid open to the bowels, 100 and some pounds put around me,
I wouldn’t want anyone to massage me. The word “anoint”
means “consecrated.” As Mr. Deedat brought out in his book,
the priests and kings were anointed when being consecrated
to their office. When He said, “Touch Me not,” Mr. Deedat
says it means, “I am hurting – don’t touch Me.” Well, read
the next phrase, Mr. Deedat. It says, “Do not touch Me,
because I haven’t yet ascended to the Father.” That’s why they’re not to touch Him because “I haven’t
ascended to the Father.” And then He says, “Now, go tell My
disciples I am ascending to the Father.” A little bit later,
He says, “You can touch Me. Grab My feet.” Why did He do
that? Oh, men and women, this is one of the most beautiful
things. In the Old Testament, at the tabernacle, the Jewish
high priest would take the sacrifice into the Holy of
Holies. And the people would wait outside, because they knew
if God did not accept their sacrifice, the priest would be
struck dead. They would wait for the high priest to come back. And
when the high priest walked back out, everybody shouted with
joy! Because they said, “God has accepted our sacrifice”
Jesus said, “Don’t touch Me … I’ve not ascended to the
Father.” Jesus, between that time and when the others
grabbed hold of Him and touched Him, ascended to God the
Father, presented Himself as a sacrifice, and, ladies and
gentlemen, if Jesus had not come back, if He had not
permitted the others to touch Him, it would have meant His
sacrifice had not been accepted. But I thank God He came
back and said, “Touch Me”. It’s been accepted. As for the spiritual physical body of Jesus Christ, I
think, Mr. Deedat, you need to first study our Scriptures. I
think you need to read just as I did to study your
scriptures. You need to read I Corinthians 15:44, 51. The
explanation of the glorified, imperishable body. It was a
spiritual body, and yet, it had substance. He could walk
through a door; He could appear in their presence. He didn’t
need food, but He took food. Otherwise, they would have
said, “You’re merely a spirit.” No, He had what the Bible
called the resurrected, glorified, incorruptible body. And
if I were in that room and I knew I’d seen Him crucified,
buried and everything else, and all of a sudden, with the
doors locked, He appeared in the midst of the group, I think
I’d be a little frightened, too. Men and women, Jesus Christ
is raised from the dead! Thank you.
REBUTTALS
# Ahmed Deedat
Mr. Chairman, and ladies and gentlemen of the jury. The
crux of the problem – the clear-cut statement by Jesus
Christ, is the mistake that the disciples were making in
thinking that He had come back from the dead. By assuring
them that “a spirit has no flesh and bones, as you see Me
have.” This is King’s English, basic English. And one does
not need a dictionary or a lawyer to explain to you what it
implies.
Throughout the length and breadth of the 27 books of the
New Testament, there is not a single statement made by Jesus
Christ that “I was dead, and I have come back from the
dead.” The Christian has been belaboring the word
resurrection. Again and again, by repetition, it is conveyed
that it is proving a fact. You keep on seeing the man, the
man’s eating food, as though He was resurrected. He appears
in the upper room – He was resurrected. Jesus Christ never
uttered that word that “I have come back from the dead,” in
the 27 books of the New Testament, not once.
He was there with them for 40 days. And He never uttered
that statement. He is proving again and again that He was
that same Jesus, the one who had escaped death, so to say,
by the skin of His teeth. Because He was ever in disguise.
He never showed Himself openly to the Jews. He had given
them a sign. “No sign shall be given unto it except the sign
of Jonah.” No sign, but this. And He never went back to them
to the temple of Jerusalem, to tell them, “Here I am.” Not
once. He was ever in hiding. Now, we will not belabor the
things that have passed.
The points were, that Jesus was not reluctant to die. He
had actually come for this purpose. Now, my reading of the
Scriptures tells me that not only was He reluctant, but He
was preparing for a show-down with the Jews. You see, at the
last Supper, He raises the problem of de- fense, telling His
disciples, “As you remember, when I sent you out on your
mission of preaching and healing, I told you that you were
not to carry anything with you. No purse, no sticks. No
staff. Did you lack anything?”
And they said “No, we lacked nothing.” But now, I tell
you, He tells them, “Those of you who have no swords must
sell their garments and buy them.” You must sell your
garments and buy swords. I’m asking you, what do you do with
swords? You peel apples? Or you cut people’s throats? What
do you do with swords? So one of them said, “Master, we have
two already.” And He said, “That is enough.”
And He takes His disciples – 11 of them. Judas had
already gone to betray Him. Eleven disciples and Himself,
and they walk to Gethsemane. And at Gethsemane – read the
book, read your gospels – and it’ll tell you that Jesus put
eight men at the gate. I’m asking you, why should He go to
Gethsemane in the first place? And why put eight at the
gate, telling them, “Tarry ye here, and watch with Me.”
He means, stop here, and keep guard. Guarding what? What
was there to guard in Gethsemane? A courtyard, olive press,
empty place. What were they, the disciples, to guard five
miles out of town at Gethsemane? Then He takes with Him,
Peter, and the two sons of Zebedee. At least two of them had
swords. And He makes an inner line of defense and He tells
them, “Tarry ye here, sit ye here, and watch with Me. While
I go and pray yonder… I alone go and pray beyond.” I’m
asking you, why did He go to Gethsemane? Why did He go there
- to pray? Couldn’t He have prayed in that upper room, while
there at the Last Supper? Couldn’t He have gone to the
temple of Jerusalem, a stone’s throw from where they were?
Why go five miles out of town? And why put eight at the
gate? And why make an inner line of defense? And He goes a little farther, and falls on His face, and
He prays to God. “Oh, my Father … if it be possible, let
this cup pass from Me.” Meaning, remove the difficulty from
Me, but not as I will, but as Thou wilt. In the end, I leave
it to You. But I want You to save Me. And, being in agony,
He prayed more earnestly, and His sweat was as if it were
great drops of blood falling down to the ground. Is this how
one man, a person goes to commit suicide? Is this how the
person who is ordained from the foundation of the earth, for
the sacrifice, is this how He behaves, I ask you? That He is sweating, it says, being in an agony, He
prays more earnestly, and His sweat was as if it were great
drops of blood falling down to the ground. And the Lord of
Mercy sends His angel, says the Bible. An angel came to
strengthen Him. I say, in what? In the belief that God was
going to save Him. What does the angel come to strengthen
Him in? To save Him. And in everything that happened from
there onward, you can see God planning His rescue. Look. The
fact was that the pro- phecy He had made was that He would
be like Jonah – and we are told that He was unlike Jonah. He
didn’t fulfill. Jonah is alive, Jesus is dead. Then, Pontius Pilate – he marveled when he was told that
Jesus was dead because in his knowledge, he knew no man can
die within three hours on the cross. Because this
crucifixion was to be a slow, linger- ing death. This was
the real purpose of crucifixion. It was not getting rid of
an anti-social character, like a firing squad, or hanging,
or impaling a person. It was a slow, lingering death. And the bones were not broken – says the Bible. It was a
fulfillment of prophecy. Now, the bones of an individual –
of a dead person – whether you break them or not, is of the
least consequence. If the bones were not broken, the only
time it can help anybody, is if the person was alive. So you
see, for 2,000 years now, it’s a programming, a continuous
programming. And Paul has put the whole gamut of religion on
one point: on this death and resurrection, because he tells
us, I Corinthians, chapter 15, verse 14, that “if Christ is
not risen from the dead, our preaching is in vain: our faith
is in vain.” Useless! You haven’t got a thing! So now, like drowning men clutching at straws, the
Christian must, by hook or by crook, prove that somehow
crucifixion killed the man, so we can earn salvation. Now,
we would like you, Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen of the
jury, to read this book once more, and the testimony, word
for word. If you examine the prophecies – what Jesus says.
and the way He behaves – they are conclusive proof that
Christ had not been crucified .
# Josh McDowell
I’m not sure that I heard, but did you say, “Nowhere in
the 27 books of the New Testament did Jesus ever say He was
‘dead and now alive'”? May I read to you from the book of
Revelation, chapter 1, verse 18? He said, “I am the living
one. I was dead, and behold, I am alive forevermore.” Also,
Mr. Deedat, He appeared to the Jews. The whole New Testament
Church was started with Jews. He appeared to the Jewish
anta- gonist, the apostle Paul, when he was Saul of Tarsus.
But men and women, the greatest thrill to me, when it
comes to the resurrection and Christ as my Life and Savior,
is that God Yahweh has promised, when a man enters into that
relationship through asking Christ to forgive him, who died
for our sins, was buried and raised again on the third day,
that God, the Holy Spirit, enters that person and changes
them. And one of the greatest evidences is my own life.
After I came to the point where I acknowledged Jesus Christ
as my Savior and Lord, surrendered my will up to Him, and
trusted Him, men and women, in about six months to a year,
or a year and a half, the major areas of my life were
changed.
First, I developed a desire to live a holy and godly
life. Second, I started to experience a peace and genuine
joy – it wasn’t because I don’t have conflict – it’s in
spite of conflict, the peace that God gives through Jesus
Christ. Third, I gained control over my temper. I almost
killed a young man my first year in a university. I was con-
stantly losing my temper. After I trusted Jesus as Savior
and Lord, I would catch myself arising to the crisis of
losing my temper, and it was gone!
Not only my friends noticed it, but my enemies did a lot
sooner. And only once now, in 22 years that I have had a
personal relationship with God Yahweh, the Father, through
His Eternal Word, the Son, only once have I lost my temper.
He has given me a supernatural strength over it.
The greatest area, men and women, that I’m thankful I
can share here, is the very love of God. In this sense: My
father was the town alcoholic. I hardly ever knew my father
when he was not drunk. My friends in school would make jokes
about my father making a fool of himself. I lived on a farm
and I’d go out to the barn and see my mother lying in the
gutter in the manure – the bathroom of the cows – beaten so
badly by my father, my mother couldn’t get up and walk.
We would have friends over. I’d take my father, tie him
up in the bam, and park the car up around the side, and tell
my friends he had to go on an important business trip, so I
wouldn’t be embarrassed. I’d take him into the bam where the
cows would have their little calves. I’d put his arms
through the boards, and tie them. I’d put a rope around his
neck and pull his head all the way over the backboard, and
tie it around the feet, so if he shuffled his feet, he would
kill himself.
One evening, two months before I graduated from high
school, I came home from a date. When I went into the house,
I heard my mother crying profusely. And I said, “What’s
wrong?” She said, “Your father has broken my heart. And all
I want to do is live until you graduate, then I just want to
die.”
Do you know, two months later, I graduated. And the next
Friday, the 13th, my mother died. Don’t tell me that you
can’t die of a broken heart. My mother did, and my father
broke it. There was no one I could have hated more. But men
and women, when I came into this relationship with God
Yahweh, through His Eternal Son, the Lord Jesus Christ,
after a short period of time, the love of God took control
of my life, and He took that hatred and turned it upside
down.
So much so, I was able to look my father square in the
eyes and say: “Dad, I love you.” And the neatest thing is, I
really meant it! I transferred to another varsity or
university. I was in a serious car accident with my legs,
arm and neck in traction. I was taken home. My father came
into my room. He was very sober because he thought I was
almost dead. He asked me this question: “How can you love a
father such as I?” I said, “Dad, six months ago, I despised
you. I hated you.” Then I shared with him how I’d come to
the conclusion seen so clearly, that God Yahweh, the Father,
had manifested Himself to us, humanity through the Eternal
Word, His Son. And then He had died for our sins, that’s the
anguish He went through, Mr. Deedat.
If you could imagine all the sins in the world – just
your sins and my sins would be enough. But all the sins in
the world are upon the Son. The anguish that was involved.
And I said, “Dad, I asked Christ to forgive me. I asked Him
to come into my life as Savior and Lord.” I said, “Dad, as
the result of that, I have found the capacity to love and
accept not only you, but other people just the way they
are.”
I can look at you, Mr. Deedat, and say, “I honestly love
you … God has given me a love for you … I love you so
much, I would love to have you come to know Jesus Christ as
Savior and Lord.” And my father finally just said, “Son, if
your God can do in my life what I have seen Him do in your
life, then I want to know Him personally.”
Right there, my father just prayed something like this:
“God, if You’re God, and Christ is the Eternal Word, Your
Son, if You can forgive me and come into my life and change
me, then I want to know You personally.”
Men and women, my life was basically changed in six
months to a year, to a year and a half. And there are still
many areas for God to change. But then, take my father. His
life was changed right before my eyes. Mr. Deedat, it was
like somebody reached out and turned on a light bulb. Do you
know, he only touched whiskey once after that. He got it to
his lips, and that was it. He didn’t need it anymore.
Fourteen months later, he died. Because three-fourths of his
stomach had to be removed, as a result of 40-some years of
drinking. But do you know, ladies and gentlemen, in that
14-month period, scores of businessmen in my home town and
the surrounding area committed their lives to the living
God, through the Eternal Word, Jesus Christ, because of the
changed life of one of the town’s drunks.
My wife, Dottie, puts it this way. She says, “Honey,
because Christ was raised from the dead, He lives. And
because He lives, He has the infinite capacity through the
Holy Spirit to enter a man or woman’s life, and change them
from the inside out.” That is why the resur- rected, living
Christ said in one of the 27 books of the New Testament, “I
was dead, now I am alive.” He can say, “I stand at the door
of your life and knock. If anyone hears My voice and opens
the door, I will come in.”
**** CLOSING STATEMENTS ***
# Ahmed Deedat
Mr. Chairman and ladies and gentlemen of the jury. Man
is coward by nature. From the beginning of Adam, you
remember, passing the buck. It’s not me, it’s the woman; and
the woman, it’s not me, it’s the serpent. Man is coward by
nature. And we want somebody else to carry the burden for
us. We want somebody else to take the medicine when we are
sick. We want somebody else’s appendix to be removed, when
ours is rotten. This is man in general.
But this is not what Jesus Christ said. He wanted you to
take up your own cross – get yourself crucified. Listen! He
says, “He is not of Me who does not take his cross and
follow Me.” Take up your cross and follow Me. In other
words. Get yourself crucified. No, no, no. No, He didn’t
mean that. What He meant was, that as I carry My
responsibility, you carry yours. As I pray, you pray. As I
fast. you fast: as I’m circumcised, you be circumcised, what
I do, you do. You carry your own responsibility.
This is what He meant. Now, that is the Islamic system!
This is what Islam teaches. You see, the system that saves
you after years of alcoholism, after years of pinching 10
cents from the collection plate, you read it here, in Josh’s
book, He says every Sunday, the only thing he got out of
church was he was putting in 25 cents and taking out 35 for
milk-shakes. And then, later on in life, if you study, we
find the same thing is being done on a very high level of
intellectualism, But we haven’t got the time to go into
that.
Let me end with the message of Jesus: He says, “Verily,
verily, I say unto you, except your righteousness exceed the
righteousness of the scribes and the pharisees, you shall by
no means enter the kingdom of heaven.” There’s no heaven for
you. This is what He says; these are His words. And what is
happening is, you are not contradicting His words. This is
Islam! Unless you are better than the Jews, there is no
heaven for you.
He didn’t say it’s the blood, but your righteousness,
You must be better than the Jews, You must fast, as the Jews
fasted, but on a higher level: you must pray, as the Jews
prayed, but on a higher level, you must give charity, as the
Jews gave charity, but on a higher level. And that is Islam.
So, Mr, Chairman, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I
say that this resurrection, as has been addressed by Josh in
America, under the heading, “Hoax or History,” I will
conclude that here are one thousand million people being
taken for a ride on a cross. In Durban, every week, we have
horses taking thousands of people for a ride – every horse.
But here, you are being taken for a ride on the cross.
Thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen.
# Josh McDowell
Mr, Deedat, nowhere in the Christian Bible revealed by
God is a Christian ever commanded to be crucified. We are
told to acknowledge that we are already crucified in Jesus
Christ.
In Romans 8:32, God, speaking from eternity into time,
says, “He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him
up … up for us all.” In my country, a young lady, who was
picked up for speeding, was brought before the judge, The
judge said, “Guilty or not guilty?” and she said, “Guilty.”
He brought down the gavel, and the judge fined her $100 or
10 days. Then, an amazing thing took place. The judge stood
up, took off his robe, placed it over the back of the chair,
went down in front, and paid the fine. He was a just judge.
His daughter had broken the law.
No matter how much he loved his daughter, he had to say
$100 or 10 days. But he loved her enough, he was willing to
go down, and take the penalty upon himself, and pay it. This
is a clear illustration of what God Yahweh has revealed
through His Holy Word. God loves us. Christ died for us. The
Bible very clearly points out the wages of sin is death. So,
God had to bring down the gavel.
But, men and women, He loved us so much, He was able to
set aside His judicial robe, and come down in the form of
the man Jesus Christ. And go to the cross and pay the price
for us. And now, He can say, “I stand at the door of your
life and knock. And if anyone hears My voice, and opens the
door, I will come in.”
Yes, Mr. Deedat, one billion Christians are riding on
the cross. We are being taken for a ride. I believe God has
provided the cross as the chariot to heaven, through the
shed blood of His divine Son.
Thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen, for giving me
the privilege, as a person from another country, to come
here, and Mr. Deedat, I am greatly indebted to you for this
opportunity. And if you come to my country, we’ll have
dinner together. Thank you.
============================================================
END OF THE DEBATE
YouTube Video of Debate
6 Irrefutable reasons Islam is false
Reason 1
Gods everlasting Covenant is with Isaac and Jacob and their line. The fakes prophet Mohammad did not come from this line and is not a prophet of God.
And God said, Sarah your wife shall bear you a son indeed; and you shall call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him.
But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto you at this set time in the next year.
- Gen. 17:19, 21
Reason 2
The multiple prophetic attestation passes the double witness rule laid down by Yahweh, the One and only True God, through the prophet and the apostle. Why?
Because ~
“One witness is not enough… A matter MUST be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.” (Deuteronomy 19:15b)
And ~
“Every matter MUST be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.”” (2 Corinthians 13:1)
The ignoble Qur’an doesn’t have multiple attestation! So it can never pass the test of prophetic reliability!
Reason 3
Islam does not allow people to do the will of the Father
No one can get into heaven EXCEPT those people who do the will of the Father.
Matthew 7:21
21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.
So what is the will Father?
1 John 3:23 tells us explicitly that it is the will of the Father that we believe in Christ. Notice we are commanded to believe in Christ.
And this is His commandment, that we believe in the name of His Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, just as He commanded us. 1 John 3:23
And there is salvation in no one else; for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men, by which we must be saved. Acts 4:12
Jesus said “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.” -John 14:6
God desires that every man and woman believe in Jesus Christ, but not everyone will obey. Only by believing in Jesus Christ and accepting his sacrifice on the cross will get you into heaven.
Reason 4
Total ignorance or denial of the New Covenant. This totally goes against what God promised Moses, Ezekiel and Jeremiah.
Reason 5
The prophets in the Old Testament told us the Messiah would be God.
Reason 6
Jesus Christ is the only way to be saved which makes Islam redundant.
ReadIng a text outside its proper context
The most common mistake of all Bible interpreters, including some critical scholars, is to read a text outside its proper context. As the adage goes, “A text out of context is a pretext.” One can prove anything from the Bible by this mistaken procedure. The Bible says, “There is no God” (Ps. 14:1, NASB). Of course, the context is: “The fool has said in his heart ‘There is no God.’ ” One may claim that Jesus admonished us not to resist evil (see Matt. 5:39), but the antiretaliatory context in which he cast this statement must not be ignored. Many read Jesus’ statement to “Give to him who asks you,” as though one had an obligation to give a gun to a small child. Failure to note that meaning is determined by context is a chief sin of those who find fault with the Bible.
Genuine mistakes have been found-in copies of Bible text made hundreds of years after the autographs. God only uttered the original text of Scripture, not the copies. Therefore, only the original text is without error. Inspiration does not guarantee that every copy is without error, especially in copies made from copies made from copies made from copies. For example, the King James Version (KJV) of 2 Kings 8:26 gives the age of King Ahaziah as 22, whereas 2 Chronicles 22:2 says 42. The later number cannot be correct, or he would have been older than his father. This is obviously a copyist error, but it does not alter the inerrancy of the original.
First, these are errors in the copies, not the originals. Second, they are minor errors (often in names or numbers) which do not affect any teaching. Third, these copyist errors are relatively few in number. Fourth, usually by the context, or by another Scripture, we know which is in error. For example, Ahaziah must have been 22. Finally, though there is a copyist error, the entire message comes through.
Yes, there are verses that appear to contradict each other. We must remember that the Bible was written by approximately 40 different authors over a period of around 1500 years. Each writer wrote with a different style, from a different perspective, to a different audience, for a different purpose. We should expect some minor differences. However, a difference is not a contradiction. It is only an error if there is absolutely no conceivable way the verses or passages can be reconciled. Even if an answer is not available right now, that does not mean an answer does not exist. Many have found a supposed error in the Bible in relation to history or geography only to find out that the Bible is correct once further archaeological evidence is discovered.
Admittedly, some of the things people bring up are difficult to answer. However, it is our contention that there are viable and intellectually plausible answers to every supposed Bible contradiction and error. There are books and websites available that list “all the errors in the Bible.” Most people simply get their ammunition from these places; they do not find supposed errors on their own. There are also books and websites available that refute every one of these supposed errors. The saddest thing is that most people who attack the Bible are not truly interested in an answer. Many “Bible attackers” are even aware of these answers, but they continue to use the same old shallow attacks again and again.
God promises to preserve His words.
The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever. (Psalms 12:6-7)
You shall not add or take away, says God.
Now therefore hearken, O Israel, unto the statutes and unto the judgments, which I teach you, for to do them, that ye may live, and go in and possess the land which the LORD God of your fathers giveth you. Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.(Deuteronomy 4:1-2)
God cares about every one of His words.
Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar. (Proverbs 30:5-6)
God’s words will never pass away.
Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away. (Jesus Christ, Son of God) (Mark 13:31)
God will curse those who change His Word.
For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. (Revelation 22:18-19)
Mohammad vs Paul
Here is the bottom line for Christians. For Christians, as soon as you say Mohammad said Jesus did not die on the cross for our sins we don’t need to hear anything else. The Bible says anyone saying this is a false prophet and antichrist. Christians have received the Holy Spirit and He tells us who Jesus really is with the peace and presence of God. Mohammad did not witness anything he said Jesus and others in the Bible said. He made it up. There is no support for anything Mohammad said about Jesus and the Bible. No one else says any of the ridiculous things he taught. Christians won’t listen to the words of Mohammad or the Quran because it’s a false word from a false prophet. We know our Bible much better than you. Your interpretations of the Bible are ridiculous and do not include the other scriptures before and after that explain it. We have no desire to leave the salvation and peace that comes through Jesus Christ for the darkness of Islam and your false prophet.
Paul was converted by Jesus Himself on the road to Damascus. Paul was filled with the Holy Spirit in Acts. He worked with Jesus disciples and wrote by the power of the Holy Spirit. He was well qualified by the Holy Spirit to write what he wrote. Mohammad did not know Jesus. He came 617 years later after Satan coming as an angel of light deceived him in a cave and said many lies about Jesus and the Bible. Mohammad was not qualified to talk about Jesus or the Bible. After he told you guys to bow toward a sacred rock 5 times a day he really should not have taught anything about God. To us he is a false prophet for what he taught about Jesus.
Mohammad said Jesus was a Muslim and then admits in Quran 6:163 that he was the first Muslim. No witnesses or historical support for anything Mohammad taught about people in the Bible. Paul was a witness to Christ and worked with Jesus disciples. He was far more qualified to teach about Jesus than Mohammad ever was.
Jesus cried out and Psalm 22
This highlights the fact that you have never read the Bible if you had you would know that Jesus was fulfilling the prophecy in Psalm 22
In Matthew 27:45-46, it says, “Now from the sixth hour darkness fell upon all the land until the ninth hour. 46And about the ninth hour Jesus cried out with a loud voice, saying, “Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?” that is, “My God, My God, why have you forsaken Me?” If Jesus is God, why would He say this?
First of all, Jesus quoted Psalm 22:1 which begins with, “My God, My God, why have you forsaken Me?” Jesus quoted this Psalm in order to draw attention to it and the fact that He was fulfilling it there on the cross. Consider verses 11-18 in Psalm 22:
“Be not far from me, for trouble is near; For there is none to help.12 Many bulls have surrounded me; Strong bulls of Bashan have encircled me. 13 They open wide their mouth at me, As a ravening and a roaring lion. 14 I am poured out like water, And all my bones are out of joint; My heart is like wax; It is melted within me. 15 My strength is dried up like a potsherd, And my tongue cleaves to my jaws; And Thou dost lay me in the dust of death. 16 For dogs have surrounded me; A band of evildoers has encompassed me; They pierced my hands and my feet. 17 I can count all my bones. They look, they stare at me; 18 They divide my garments among them, And for my clothing they cast lots.
The term ‘dogs’ was used by the Jews to refer to Gentiles (cf. Matt. 15:21-28). His heart has melted within Him (v. 14). During the crucifixion process, the blood loss causes the heart to beat harder and harder and become extremely fatigued. Dehydration occurs (v. 15). Verses 16b-18 speak of piercing His hands and feet and dividing his clothing by casting lots. This is exactly what happen as described in Matt. 27:35.
Psalm 22 was written about 1000 years before Christ was born. At that time, crucifixion had not yet been invented. Actually, the Phoenicians developed it, and Rome borrowed the agonizing means of execution from them. So, when Rome ruled over Israel, it became the Roman means of capital punishment imposed upon the Jews whose biblical means of execution was stoning. Nevertheless, Jesus is pointing to the scriptures to substantiate His messianic mission.
A further comment
2 Cor. 5:21 says, “He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” It is possible that at some moment on the cross when Jesus became sin on our behalf, that God the Father, in a sense, turned His back upon the Son. It says in Hab. 1:13 that God is too pure to look upon evil. Therefore, it is possible that when Jesus bore our sins in His body on the cross (1 Pet. 2:24), that the Father, spiritually, turned away. At that time, the Son may have cried out.
One thing is for sure. We have no capacity to appreciate the utterly horrific experience of having the sins of the world put upon the Lord Jesus as He hung in excruciating pain from that cross. The physical pain was immense. The spiritual one must have been even greater.
That shows us clearly how much God loves us.
Forgiveness
THE BLOTTING OUT OF SINS
1). INTRODUCTION [all quotes are from NKJV]
Since there is no atonement and no vicarious sacrifice as the basis for forgiveness in Islam, the Muslim will try to find an alternative basis for Allah to show mercy. They claim he can just “blot out” sins as if they never existed [1] ignoring the fact that there is a tension between mercy and justice. Showing mercy at the expense of retributive justice is not the hallmark of a perfectly just God. As William Lane Craig argues: “A Judge in a criminal case “has an obligation to do justice—which means, at a minimum, an obligation to uphold the rule of law. Thus if he is moved, even by love or compassion, to act contrary to the rule of law—to the rules of justice—he acts wrongly.”
In order to sustain their position, Muslims are quite content to reach for the Bible where they think it assists them, and will cherrypick isolated verses such as those below which speak of God “blotting out sins” as the likeness to Allah’s approach to forgiveness:
“I, even I, am He who blots out your transgressions for My own sake; And I will not remember your sins. Put Me in remembrance; Let us contend together; State your case, that you may be acquitted. Your first father sinned, And your mediators have transgressed against Me. Therefore I will profane the princes of the sanctuary; I will give Jacob to the curse, And Israel to reproaches.” (Isaiah 43:25-28)
“Remember these, O Jacob, And Israel, for you are My servant; I have formed you, you are My servant; O Israel, you will not be forgotten by Me! I have blotted out, like a thick cloud, your transgressions, And like a cloud, your sins. Return to Me, for I have redeemed you.” (Isaiah 44:21-22)
2). ARE OUR SINS ERASED ONCE WE ARE FORGIVEN?
Are our sins blotted out when we come before God in repentance, and ask Him to forgive us? God’s word answers No! David knew that his sins were not blotted out at the time he repented of them. Even after he had repented of his sins, he still prayed for God to blot them out, because his sins were ever before him. David knew from where his sin truly needed to be blotted out: from his heart, mind, and character—his innermost being! And this is exactly what God did for David; He created a new heart and right spirit within David and erased the sinfulness from David’s character. History did not get erased, as evidenced by the Bible and its ongoing record of David’s sin that we are all still reading about today.
“Have mercy upon me, O God, According to Your loving kindness; According to the multitude of Your tender mercies, Blot out my transgressions. Wash me thoroughly from my iniquity, And cleanse me from my sin. For I acknowledge my transgressions, And MY SIN IS ALWAYS BEFORE ME. BEHOLD, I WAS BROUGHT FORTH IN INIQUITY, AND IN SIN MY MOTHER CONCEIVED ME. Hide Your face from my sins, And blot out all my iniquities. Create in me a clean heart, O God, And renew a steadfast spirit within me. Deliver me from the guilt of bloodshed, O God, The God of my salvation, And my tongue shall sing aloud of Your righteousness.” (Psalms 51:1-3, 5, 9-10, 14)
The fact is even after we are forgiven we remain scarred by sins for life. We remain guilty sinners throughout our lives on earth. The difference being that once we have forgiveness based upon the shed blood of Jesus which washes us clean, it allows us to live with that past and not feel condemned by it, and have the peace of knowing that God already treats us as righteous; it gives us a fresh start a lifelong process of sanctification and renewal. We have the promise of an unmerited divine pardon even when we remain guilty and even when our sins are not yet erased.
Elsewhere, God says that our sins are still marked before Him – therefore He has not yet blotted them out, because He has promised that when He does blot them out, He will not bring them to remembrance.
“For though you wash yourself with lye, and use much soap, Yet your iniquity is marked before Me,” says the Lord God.” (Jeremiah 2:22)
The prophet Isaiah knew that his sins, and the sins of Israel, had not been blotted out, even though they had been repented of and confessed. He knew that all their sins were still multiplied before God.
“We all growl like bears, And moan sadly like doves; We look for justice, but there is none; For salvation, but it is far from us. For our transgressions are multiplied before You, And our sins testify against us; For our transgressions are with us, And as for our iniquities, we know them: So truth fails, And he who departs from evil makes himself a prey.” (Isaiah 59:11-12)
How did God respond? He saw there was neither justice nor an intercessor, so He took the initiative that brings salvation. In this same chapter of Isaiah we find the promise of the Messiah who alone is our Redeemer:
“Then the Lord saw it, and it displeased Him That there was no justice. He saw that there was no man, And wondered that there was no intercessor; Therefore His own arm brought salvation for Him; And His own righteousness, it sustained Him. “The Redeemer will come to Zion, And to those who turn from transgression in Jacob,” Says the Lord.” (Isaiah 59:15-16, 20)
From the New Testament we can learn much from how Paul reconciled himself to his sinful past.
First he considered himself a serious sinner:
“This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief.” (I Timothy 1:15)
Secondly, he needed to recognise the point of sorrow leading to repentance and move on from it:
“Now I rejoice, not that you were made sorry, but that your sorrow led to repentance. For you were made sorry in a godly manner, that you might suffer loss from us in nothing. For godly sorrow produces repentance leading to salvation, not to be regretted; but the sorrow of the world produces death.”(2 Corinthians 7:9-10)
Thirdly, Paul strove to put the past behind him.
“Brethren, I do not count myself to have apprehended; but one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind and reaching forward to those things which are ahead, I press toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.” (Philippians 3:13-14)
3). THE ERRONEOUS LEGALISTIC VIEW
By the school of legalism, preachers will teach that when we confess our sins, God goes to the “heavenly books” with the blood of Jesus and apply it to our record, thus removing the paper trail of our sins. This process is vital to our salvation, because, they claim, these books will be opened in the final judgment, and if there are any sins that have not been erased, we will not only be excluded from heaven, but God will use His power to punish us for the unconfessed sins remaining in the books.
It’s no surprise that such a teaching incites a fear of, and not a love for God in people’s lives. Instead of fixating on the Remedy, people become fixated on their sins and their fears of punishment: Is there something I haven’t confessed? What if I don’t remember my sins from years ago and they are still on the books?
This teaching also causes people to form belief systems that function to hide or protect them from God, rather than reconcile us to Him. Instead of saying God is the solution to our sin problem, this understanding says He is the problem we must address. It’s similar to the idea that being covered by the robe of Christ’s righteousness means that the perfect life of Jesus obscures our histories from the Father’s awareness and, thus, in the judgment, the Father doesn’t see our histories of sin; instead, He sees only the perfect life of His Son. This is necessary, it is claimed, because if the Father saw even one sin not hidden by Jesus, then God would strike out and destroy us.
Exodus 32:33 is another Bible text used to support this claim.
The LORD replied to Moses, “Whoever has sinned against me I will blot out of my book.”
Once again, this is taken to mean that “we either get our sins blotted out of the books of heaven or we get ourselves blotted out of the books of heaven.”
Viewing the Bible through the imposed-law lens and taking illustrations and metaphors “as they read,” the legalist must conclude that the “blotting out of sin” is the literal blotting out of historical deeds from the books in heaven, in order to hide our misconduct from God.
Such an unbalanced view is not the reality of God’s word.
4). THE REALITY OF FORGIVENESS
If we can say that the heavenly records are not a long list of historical deeds that need to be erased, then what is recorded there and what is being erased? Revelation reveals the answer:
“He who overcomes shall be clothed in white garments, and I will not blot out his name from the Book of Life; but I will confess his name before My Father and before His angels.” (Revelation 3:5)
Now we have a clue to what is the truth—the reality—behind the metaphor of “blotting out”? Where does sin happen? In record books or in the hearts and minds of people? From where does God want to erase our sin? From recorded history or from the minds, hearts, and characters of His people?
The following is what happens when we confess our sins in the daily Christian experience: Jesus forgives us, and cleanses us from all unrighteousness. He places upon us His robe of righteousness, and He writes Pardon against our names in the Books of Record in Heaven. But He does not, at that same time, blot out our sins. The record remains, to be dealt with in the Final Atonement.
William Lane Craig gives us his balanced summary:
“The object of divine forgiveness is just as often said to be of sins as sinners. Not only are people forgiven for their sins, but their sins are forgiven. God is said to “take away” (aphaireō) our sins (Romans 11.27). This fact makes it evident that divine forgiveness is not (merely) a change of attitude on God’s part toward sinners. Divine forgiveness has as its effect, not (merely) God’s laying aside His wrath, but rather the removal of the liability to punishment that attends sin. As a result of divine forgiveness, a person who formerly deserved punishment now no longer does so. Because of the forgiveness that is to be found in Christ, one is no longer held accountable for one’s sins. “There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus” (Romans 8.1). On the contrary, they are now reckoned by God to be righteous in His sight (Romans 4.5-8). The biblical concept of forgiveness thus entails God’s pardoning people for their sins, freeing them of liability to punishment and constituting them righteous before God.”
In 1 John we find more about the ongoing dependence and need to know forgiveness. This is not a one off event. It’s a walk with God. And it’s only by His grace.
“But if we walk in the light as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus Christ His Son cleanses us from all sin. If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar, and His word is not in us.” (I John 1:7-10)
Isaiah saw God’s righteousness adorning him like a garment. Notice WHO is doing the clothing, it is from God not of ourselves:
I will greatly rejoice in the Lord , My soul shall be joyful in my God; For HE HAS CLOTHED ME WITH THE GARMENTS OF SALVATION, HE HAS COVERED ME WITH THE ROBE OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, As a bridegroom decks himself with ornaments, And as a bride adorns herself with her jewels. For as the earth brings forth its bud, As the garden causes the things that are sown in it to spring forth, So the Lord God WILL CAUSE RIGHTEOUSNESS AND PRAISE TO SPRING FORTH BEFORE ALL NATIONS.” (Isaiah 61:10-11)
The writer of Hebrews makes clear when God will remember sins no more:
“For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord : I will put My laws in their mind and write them on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. None of them shall teach his neighbor, and none his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for all shall know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them. For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and THEIR SINS AND THEIR LAWLESS DEEDS I WILL REMEMBER NO MORE.” (Hebrews 8:10-12)
“For they shall all know me” is a clear reference to the Millennial rule after Christ’s return.
Peter also made it very clear in the Book of Acts as to when the sins of God’s people are going to be blotted out:
“Repent therefore and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, so that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord, and that He may send Jesus Christ, who was preached to you before, whom heaven must receive until the times of restoration of all things, which God has spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began.” (Acts 3:19-21)
5). THE TWO JUDGEMENTS (FOR THE INDIVIDUAL)
Many Bible interpreters assume there is only one judgment at the end of the age, a judgment that separates believers from unbelievers. This causes major problems in harmonizing some Scriptures. For example, in John 5:24 Jesus says that anyone who believes in Him “shall not come into judgment,” but in 2 Corinthians 5:10 Paul says of believers, “. . . we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ.” If these speak of the same judgment, they would be in contradiction. How should we view these coming judgments? Distinguishing between the two judgments
All people individually face a judgment (Hebrews 9:27). The Bible speaks of two great coming judgments, and both judgments involve people’s works. (These are not to be confused with the separate judgment of the Jewish and Gentile Nations during the Tribulation, described by Jesus in Matthew 25:31- 46). See this link for an outline of the different judgments:
www.google.com/amp/s/www.gotquestions.org/amp/all-the-judgments.html
The first judgment is a final judgment of condemnation for only unbelievers. John 5:24 relates to those who believe in Jesus Christ and receive eternal life. They will not have to face the final judgment of Revelation 20:11-15, a judgment of unbelievers after Christ’s return to earth as King. Works are mentioned there as evidence that their condemnation and suffering is deserved.
“And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and books were opened. And another book was opened, which is the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their works, by the things which were written in the books. The sea gave up the dead who were in it, and Death and Hades delivered up the dead who were in them. And they were judged, each one according to his works.” (Revelation 20:12-13)
The Bible also speaks clearly about a judgment facing only believers, called the Judgment Seat of Christ (Greek, bema). In this judgment, believers will not be judged for their faith in Christ as Savior, but for their faithfulness in following Christ as Lord. There, believers will have to give an account for how they used their lives. One’s works determines whether one is rewarded or denied rewards.
These two judgments can be compared in the chart below. See also footnote [2] for the difference it makes.
6). CONCLUSIONS
Sinfulness—not sins—is what is being blotted out of the hearts, minds, and characters of God’s people. And in its place, God writes in His perfection. And because the records in heaven are the perfect record of each of our characters, the sinfulness that used to be in our characters, and thus in the records of heaven, is removed both from our characters and, subsequently, the record of our character in heaven. In other words, the only way to have sin removed from your record in heaven is to trust God, to open your heart to His Remedy, and to have sinfulness removed from your character here on earth.
Those who refuse to allow God into their hearts to remove sinfulness and write in His righteousness will, instead of having their sins blotted out of their hearts, and therefore their records, have themselves blotted out of existence; thus, they will be removed from the heavenly records. This is precisely what is meant by the Exodus 32 passage quoted “Whoever has sinned against me I will blot out of my book.”
Finally, for those who think the actual memory of our sins will be erased from our minds and those of others, during this life, consider Jesus’ response to those who criticized the woman who anointed His feet with expensive oil: “Therefore, I tell you, her many sins have been forgiven—for she loved much. But he who has been forgiven little loves little” (Luke 7:47).
This is what Jesus is saying in Luke 7:47: If we don’t remember from what Jesus has delivered us, we will appreciate Him and love Him little. This is why Revelation tells us that the 144,000 sing a song only they will be able to sing—no others in all the universe will be able to sing this song (Revelation 14:3). Why? Is it because no one else has the musical skill? Is it because God forbids others to sing it? No! It is because it is a song of their experience, and only those who have the experience can sing of the experience. And the only way they can sing of their experience is if they remember their experience.
So, don’t fall for the legal lie—which is the model of the Muslim idea that sins are merely bad deeds that require erasure from record books. Such heresy only instills within us the belief that sin is mostly a behavioral problem, rather than a heart problem; it also says God is the One we must fear, because He will punish us for any unconfessed sin, instead of fearing sin itself and what it will do to us if we don’t take the Remedy that is found only in Christ and the healing power of the Cross.
Muslims and other unbelievers, embrace the truth that God wants to erase all sin, all defects, and all deviations from His design from you and restore you to His ideal! And He will do it if you trust Him! It’s all about what He has done to clothe us in His righteousness and about renewing our hearts and minds. Amen.
FOOTNOTES
[1] Not only does Allah show gratuitous mercy without retributive justice, according to Surah 25 he can even transform (in other words falsify) the record of sins into good deeds! Imagine an earthly judge acting in such a way?
In Surah 25 we find this:
“And those who invoke not any other ilah (god) along with Allah, nor kill such life as Allah has forbidden, except for just cause, nor commit illegal sexual intercourse and whoever does this shall receive the punishment. The torment will be doubled to him on the Day of Resurrection, and he will abide therein in disgrace; Except those who repent and believe (in Islamic Monotheism), and do righteous deeds, for those, Allah will CHANGE THEIR SINS INTO GOOD DEEDS, and Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. And whosoever repents and does righteous good deeds, then verily, he repents towards Allah with true repentance.” (Surah 25:68-71)
Astonishingly, this passage doesn’t only say that Allah forgives but that he also actually changes a person’s sins into good deeds, i.e. Allah will reckon every transgression committed by an individual as a good deed. This means that Allah will actually reward a person for all the crimes s/he has committed!
The hadiths substantiate this fact:
2594. Anas narrated that the Prophet said: “Allah will say: ‘Remove from the Fire whoever remembered Me one day, or feared Me while in a state of sinning.’” (Hasan)
[Abu ‘Eisa said:] This Hadith is Hasan Gharib Sahih.
Comments:
Remembering Allah and fearing Him is the sign of one’s faith. The Hadith confirms that even those persons who have no good in their Register of Deeds expect the weakest form of faith (iman) will ultimately get deliverance from Fire through Allah’s benevolence and mercy. (English Translation of Jami‘ At-Tirmidhi, Compiled by Imam Hafiz ‘Eisa Mohammad Ibn ‘Eisa At-Tirmidhi, From Hadith no. 1897 to 2605, translated by Abu Khalil (USA), Ahadith edited and referenced by Hafiz Abu Tahir Zubair ‘Ali Za’i, final review by Islamic Research Section Darussalam [Darussalam Publishers & Distributors, First Edition: November 2007], Volume 4, Chapter 9. What Has Been Related About ‘The Fire Has Two Breaths,’ And What Has Been Mentioned About Those Who Will Exit The Fire From The People of Tawhid, p. 572; underline emphasis ours)
And:
2596. Abu Dharr narrated that the Messenger of Allah said: “I know that the last of the people of the Fire depart from the Fire and the last of the people of Paradise to enter Paradise. A man will be brought forth and He will say: ‘Ask about his small sins and hide his large sins.’ So it will be said to him: ‘Did you do this and that on such and such a day, did you do this and that on such-and-such a day?’” He said: “Then it will be said to him: ‘FOR EACH OF YOUR SINS YOU SHALL HAVE A REWARD.’” He said: “So he will say: ‘O Lord! I have done things that I do not see here.’” He (Abu Dharr) said: “I saw the Messenger of Allah laugh until his molars were visible.” (Sahih)
Abu ‘Eisa said: This Hadith is Hasan Sahih.
Allah’s benevolence and mercy are boundless. NO RULES OR LAWS CAN BIND HIM, since He is for Whom it is said in the Qur’an: He cannot be questioned as to what He does. (21:23) HE WILL, THEREFORE, CHANGE THE SINS INTO VIRTUOUS DEEDS FOR WHOMEVER HE WILLS. (Ibid., Chapter 10. Something Else Regarding The Story Of The Last Of The People Of The Fire To Leave it, pp. 573-574; capitals for emphasis)
These narrations speak of Allah actually giving people who have done no good whatsoever a reward for every sin they have committed!
Talk about a travesty of justice! Not only does Allah not punish the wicked he actually rewards them for their wickedness! As the commentator stated, Allah is not bound by anything and is therefore a capricious being who can pervert justice. Clearly, Muhammad’s god is not simply an amoral being, one who is morally neutral, he is actually immoral and unholy who promotes wickedness and is the cause of outright injustice.
It is one thing to forgive an evil deed, it is altogether something else to “turn sins into good deeds”, i.e. reward them as if they had been good deeds. It makes Allah unjust, morally reprehensible, for rewarding people for evil deeds.
[2] The difference it makes
If the two coming judgments are confused into one general judgment, then good works become necessary for salvation, because works play a role in both judgments. Of course, this would contradict clear statements of Scripture such as Romans 3:19-4:5; Galatians 2:16; Ephesians 2:8-9, and Titus 3:5. It would be impossible to say that we are saved by grace as a free gift from God. Works are mentioned in both judgments, but never as the basis or condition for salvation.
This would also radically change the motivation for godly conduct. External good works would be sought as evidence of salvation, or conversely, the fear of insufficient works would leave many in doubt of their salvation and in fear of eternal condemnation. The focus on outward conduct can be deceptive and detract from true inner godliness. Living in doubt and fear about one’s salvation is never a good basis for growing in grace.
Confusion of the two judgments would also undermine the accountability of Christians as a motivation for godly conduct. Believers who do not fear condemnation find the freedom to live their lives in light of their final evaluation at the Judgment Seat of Christ. Having their eternal salvation secure should motivate believers to serve God and live godly lives, because of love and gratitude toward God. The fear factor is removed, as far as eternal salvation is concerned.
The two great coming judgments are different for believers and unbelievers respectively. Those who have believed in Jesus Christ as Savior will not come under judgment for their salvation, but will escape condemnation. However, they will have to give an account for how they lived as Christians. Those who have rejected Jesus Christ as Savior face only a judgment of condemnation ending in the Lake of Fire. Appropriately, the Bible ends with both a reminder of rewards for believers, “And behold, I [Jesus] am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to every one according to his work.”(Revelation 22:12), as well as an invitation to unbelievers:
“And the Spirit and the Bride say, “Come!” And let him who hears say, “Come!” And let him who thirsts come. Whoever desires, let him take of the water of life freely.” (Revelation 22:17).
Get Outlook for Android <aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
Jesus Never employed the same rebuke He gave Satan
If as you claim, Jesus is not God why didn’t He employ the same rebuke He gave Satan here, on every one of the many times when He Himself was worshipped? This rebuke is NEVER used on any other occasion. I challenge you to explain why not.
“Then Jesus said to him, “Away with you, Satan! For it is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only you shall serve.’” (Matthew 4:10)