All posts by Alastair Tucker

If the Quran is true, then Islam is false

If the Quran is true, then Islam is false. Why? Because the Quran says to trust the Gospels and the four Gospels contradict the Quran. This means the Quran can’t be true if it says the gospel message is also true. In order to show this, I will quote several verses from the Quran. The more important ones are bolded for easy reference later.

None can change Allah’s words
6:34, “Rejected were the messengers before thee: with patience and constancy they bore their rejection and their wrongs, until Our aid did reach them: there is none that can alter the words (and decrees) of Allah. Already hast thou received some account of those messengers.”
6:115, “The word of thy Lord doth find its fulfilment in truth and in justice: None can change His words: for He is the one who heareth and knoweth all.”
18:27, “And recite (and teach) what has been revealed to thee of the Book of thy Lord: none can change His Words, and none wilt thou find as a refuge other than Him.”
Moses was given the Torah
2:87, “We gave Moses the Book and followed him up with a succession of messengers; We gave Jesus the son of Mary Clear (Signs) and strengthened him with the holy spirit. Is it that whenever there comes to you a messenger with what ye yourselves desire not, ye are puffed up with pride?- Some ye called impostors, and others ye slay!
3:3, “It is He Who sent down to thee (step by step), in truth, the Book, confirming what went before it; and He sent down the Law (of Moses) and the Gospel (of Jesus) before this, as a guide to mankind, and He sent down the criterion (of judgment between right and wrong).”
David was given the Psalms
4:163, “We have sent thee inspiration, as We sent it to Noah and the Messengers after him: we sent inspiration to Abraham, Isma’il, Isaac, Jacob and the Tribes, to Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon, and to David We gave the Psalms.”
Jesus was given the gospel
57:27, “Then, in their wake, We followed them up with (others of) Our messengers: We sent after them Jesus the son of Mary, and bestowed on him the Gospel; and We ordained in the hearts of those who followed him Compassion and Mercy. But the Monasticism which they invented for themselves, We did not prescribe for them: (We commanded) only the seeking for the Good Pleasure of Allah; but that they did not foster as they should have done. Yet We bestowed, on those among them who believed, their (due) reward, but many of them are rebellious transgressors.
Christians should judge by what is in the Gospel
5:47, “Let the people of the Gospel judge by what Allah hath revealed therein. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed, they are (no better than) those who rebel.”
The Quran confirms the Torah, the Psalms, and the Gospels and guards them
5:48 To thee [the people of the gospel] We sent the Scripture in truth, confirming the scripture that came before it, and guarding it in safety: so judge between them by what Allah hath revealed, and follow not their vain desires, diverging from the Truth that hath come to thee. To each among you have we prescribed a law and an open way. If Allah had so willed, He would have made you a single people, but (His plan is) to test you in what He hath given you: so strive as in a race in all virtues. The goal of you all is to Allah; it is He that will show you the truth of the matters in which ye dispute;
Ask Christians about spiritual things
10.94, “If thou wert in doubt as to what We have revealed unto thee, then ask those who have been reading the Book from before thee: the Truth hath indeed come to thee from thy Lord: so be in no wise of those in doubt.”
Curse on those who say God has a son
9:30, “The Jews call ‘Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah’s curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth!
Jesus not crucified
4:157, “That they said (in boast), “We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah”;- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not.”
Alright, so we see that…

None can change Allah’s words (6:34; 6:115; 18:27).
Jesus was given the gospel by Allah (57:27).
The Quran confirms the Gospels (5:48)
The Gospels contradict the Quran
So, if the Quran confirms the Gospels which says that Jesus was crucified (Matthew 27:26″31; Mark 15:15″20; Luke 23:32″34; John 19:17-18) and the Quran says Jesus was not crucified (Surah 4:157), then the Quran is false. But if it says the Gospels are false, then the Quran denies its own teaching and Islam is false.

Not the Religion of Peace

NOT THE RELIGION OF PEACE: THE QURAN SANCTIONS ALL JIHADIST ACTS OF TERROR
■ THE PURPOSE OF JIHAD
There is only one religion which makes it an article of faith to wage war on unbelievers.
Muslims often say “Islamic Law forbids aggressive warfare”. There is no truth in that claim:
1). The purpose or goal of Jihad. The Quran is the ultimate source for later legal opinions. It is considered completely reliable and inerrant. What does it say about jihad:- Surah 9:33 “It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth, to make it superior over all religions, though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah) hate (it)”. This verse is repeated two more times, word for word, in Suras 61:9 and 48:28.
The Arabic word for “to make it superior” comes from the root z-h-r, which means “to become distinct, obvious, conspicuous, or manifest; to ascend or to mount; to have the upper hand.” It can also mean “triumph” or “victorious” or “prevail.” That alone gives justification for violent Jihad as prescribed in over 100 verses of the Quran.
2). Rules for Jihad.
(i). Conquered women and children may be enslaved (Surah 33.25-26)
(ii). Women captives may be forced to marry their Muslim masters, regardless of the marital status of the women. That is, the masters are allowed to have sex with the enslaved sex objects. (Surah 4.24)
(iii). A captured enemy may be killed, ransomed by money or by an exchange, enslaved, or released freely. (Surah 47.4)
(iv). 4. The conquered are allowed (or forced) to convert. (Surah 8.70)
(v). Old men and Christian monks may be killed. (Surah 9.29 and 9.33)
(vi). Property may be stolen. (Surah 8.7 and 33.27).
(vii). Property – including homes and fruit trees may be destroyed. (Surah 59.2 and 59.5)
(viii). Ultimatum imposed on the enemy – basically 3 choices: (1) Fight and die; (2) convert; (3) keep their religion, but pay a tax, the jizyah. (Surah 9.29)
■ LEGAL OPINION
Al-Misri (d. 1368), ‘Reliance of the Traveler: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law’, (rev. ed., trans. Nuh Ha Mim Keller, Beltsville, Maryland: Amana, 1994), summarizes rulings in the Shafi school of fiqh. says that jihad establishes the religion of Islam. “. . Jihad means to war against non-Muslims and is etymologically derived from the mujahada, signifying warfare to establish religion.” (p. 599, o9.0)
So in light of the above, Muslims claim that Islamic law forbids aggressive warfare is frankly tosh.
By comparison and in total contrast there is not a single verse from the New Testament (which is what governs Christian behaviour) that advocates violence not even in self defence. The sword belongs to the State: “For government is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, because it does not carry the sword for no reason. For government is God’s servant, an avenger that brings wrath on the one who does wrong.” (Romans 13:4 HCSB)
It is arguable from a Biblical perspective that even individuals carrying a sword is for purely deterrence value only. But that is not a subject for this Post or discussion thread.
Nevertheless it is not uncommon to hear Muslims claiming that the Bible is more violent than the Quran. Really? Then, how do we explain all the violence committed day after day by Muslims all over the world? Where does their incentive to kill come from? It is incredible how Muslims can even come up with such an absurd allegation. What is even more bizarre than this outrageous lie is the number of Westerners who are taken in by this deception. It is really mind-boggling how people can allow themselves to become blinded so easily. Many of my generation who lived during the early sixties are familiar with a well-known Bob Dylan song, “Blowing in the Wind.” A couple of verses in the song read: “How many times can a man turn his head pretending he just doesn’t see? The answer my friend is blowing in the wind.”
Yes, the answer is blowing in the wind. It is blowing all over the world where Muslims routinely murder innocent people on a daily basis in the name of Allah. Nigeria sees it on a daily basis. Burkina Faso is showing a similar emerging pattern of terror and violence against individuals and institutions. Mozambique, Kenya and Uganda have suffered Islamic insurgency. And many are turning their heads pretending not to see the connection between the teachings of Allah in the Quran and the violence perpetrated by Muslims. And they deliberately ignore the fact that Islam is directly responsible for much of the violence that we are now experiencing around the globe. Comedian Richard Pryor once told the story about how his wife caught him red-handed in bed with another woman. He denied everything and then asked his wife: “Whom are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?” This is exactly how Muslims argue – along with the politicians and the mainstream media – and they seriously expect to fool the rest of us. They want us to turn a blind eye to the reality. And they think that by repeatedly proclaiming the lie that “Islam means peace” we will somehow become oblivious to all the violent acts committed right before our eyes in the name of Islam.
Both Muslims and Christians are on the world stage. It does not take much looking around to see which group is bombing churches, looting and pillaging whole villages, killing, raping, torturing and beheading in the name of its religion. If you put 100 Christians of different denominations in a room, you will find them arguing over virtually every aspect of their faith. But, you would not find them debating whether they’re supposed to be out killing cartoonists, shooting up schools, murdering some neighbors, beheading fellow-workers, taking hostages at a café, or blowing themselves up in crowded markets. Only one religion inspires such heinous acts.
There are criminals in every society. Criminals carry out their evil crimes by submitting to their own evil desires and acting on those cravings. Anyone claiming to do it in the name of Christianity is acting in total violation of its values, and such cases can NEVER justify any supposedly copycat behaviour. However, in Islam it is different. Muslims carry out their violent crimes in the name of Allah. They use the Quran not the Bible as their justification and their inspiration. Every beheading, every attack by suicide bombers, and every violent act that is religiously sanctioned in Islam is carried out to the accompaniment of the blood-thirsty cries of “Allahu Akbar” – the war cry of Islam. And jihadists often quote passages from the Quran before executing their victims. The evil crimes of the Muslims originate with Allah. The seeds of terror and the violence that we are now witnessing worldwide are sown in the Quran. To those who disagree that the Quran encourages violence, we would like them to examine the facts. Can Muslims honestly say that the Quran promotes peace when it teaches the followimg:
○ Muslims are to slay those who leave Islam?
Surah 4:89: “If they turn back, seize them and kill them wherever you may find them; and take no friend or helper from among them. (W. Khan)
○ Sanctions rape of the women captives of war–even married ones?
Surah 4:24: “Also forbidden are married women unless they are captives of war. Such is the decree of God.” (Ahmed Ali)
○ Commands the violent elimination of adherents to all other religions?
Surah 2:193: “And fight with them until there is no persecution and religion should be only for Allah.” (Shakir)
○ Authorizes the complete extermination of those who do not submit to the teachings of Islam?
Surah 8:7: “But Allah wished to confirm the truth by His words, and wipe the unbelievers out to the last.” (Samira)
Surah 2:191: “And kill them wherever you find them.” (Shakir)
○ Commands Muslims to “murder and crucify” those who “make mischief” in the land?
Surah 5:33: The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides…” (Shakir)
The open license that Surah 5:33 gives Muslims is shocking. It opens a flood-gate of reasons for Muslims to simply kill and crucify all those whom they perceive as opposing the “religion of peace”. Simply questioning the teachings of Islam or Muhammad can be construed as an act of “mischief.” Yes! What about all these verses in the Quran? The objective of Islam is crystal clear. It is to subjugate by force and threat of force, and if that fails the to kill all those who do not accept Allah as their God or Muhammad as their Prophet! Read carefully the unambiguous warning of Muhammad:
Sahih Muslim, Book 1, Hadith 31: “It is reported on the authority of Abu Huraira that he heard the Messenger of Allah say: I have been commanded to fight against people, till they testify to the fact that there is no god but Allah, and believe in me that I am the messenger (from the Lord) and in all that I have brought. And when they do it, their blood and riches are guaranteed protection on my behalf except where it is justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah.”
Only by submitting to Islam are “blood and riches are guaranteed protection.” The Quran contains more than a hundred verses that call for the Muslims to wage war against the infidels.
○ Hypocrites also become the enemy ripe for slaughter.
Muslims who do not join the fight against the non-Muslims are branded as “Hypocrites” in the Quran. And these “Hypocrites” will also be targeted for slaughter if they do not share in the killings of the non-Muslims. Therefore, if you are a peaceful non-violent Muslim, you are a “Hypocrite” according to the Quran:
Surah 3:167: “And the Hypocrites also. These were told: “Come, fight in the way of Allah, or (at least) drive the foe from your city.” They said: “Had we known how to fight, we should certainly have followed you.” They were that day nearer to Unbelief than to Faith, saying with their lips what was not in their hearts but Allah hath full knowledge of all they conceal.” (Yusuf Ali)
○ Open ended subjugation of unbelievers.
The Quranic verses calling for the violent subjugation of non-Muslims are open-ended. This means that they are not restrained or limited by time or circumstance. In other words, they are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah. Therefore, the call for warfare against the non-Muslims is just as relevant today as it was in Muhammad’s time:
Surah 8:65: “O Prophet! Rouse the Believers to the fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred, they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers: for these are a people without understanding.” (Yusuf Ali)
Islam is not a religion of peace, and it has never been. The following are direct quotes from the Quran. According to the Quran not only is warfare “ordained” for the Muslims but Allah also states that “warfare” is “good” for them:
Surah 2:216: “Warfare is ordained for you, though it is hateful unto you; but it may happen that you hate a thing which is good for you, and it may happen that you love a thing which is bad for you. Allah knoweth, you know not.” (Pickthall)
To deceive us, Muslim scholars deceitfully claim that Islamic wars are defensive in nature. The following Quranic verse belies their claim:
Surah 9:29: “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, even if they are the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued.” (Yusuf Ali)
Carefully study the commandment of Allah in the above Quranic verse. It does not say that Muslims should only fight against those who attack them. The Quran clearly commands Muslims to fight all those “who believe not in Allah” nor “acknowledge the religion of Truth.” And this means every one of us who are not Muslims.
As we can clearly see, the commandment in Surah 9:29 does not restrict the Muslims to fight only in self-defense as Islamic scholars deceitfully claim. It is an unmistakable commandment to wage offensive warfare against all those who do not recognize Islam as the religion of Truth. Therefore, doing anything which is forbidden in the Quran by Allah means that you have signed your own death warrant when Islam reigns supreme. The only reason why Muslims are not exterminating us today on a global scale is because of the prevailing strength of the infidels. It may not remain this way forever. But there is more to Surah 9:29.
■ MUSLIMS AS THE VICTIMS: THE BASIS FOR THE EXTORTION OF JIZYA.
While Surah 9:29 commands Muslims to wage warfare against the non-Muslims, this Quranic verse specifically singles out the “People of the Book.” The term, “People of the Book” refers to the Jews and the Christians. Muslims were commanded to fight the Jews and the Christians “until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” It is important to understand the reason for Allah’s commandment to fight against the Jews and the Christians in spite of their pacifism. Not only is it not because they were attacking or even planning to attack the Muslims. There is a more sinister aspect to it. It may shock you to learn that it was simply because the Muslims feared poverty. A new situation developed during the early days of Islam, resulting in the sudden loss of trade for the Muslims. This was because Allah decided to prohibit the pagans from entering the sacred Mosque in Mecca. It had unintended consequences, by resulting in financial loss for the Muslims. Thus the Muslim victim mentality was spawned.
What was Allah’s solution for the financial reversal of the Muslims? Simply attack the Jews and the Christians and let them compensate for the loss of trade. This is made clear in Surah 9:28 – the verse preceding Surah 9:29. We will now consider both these verses together so as to understand how the Jews and the Christians were forced to compensate for the loss of trade of the Muslims:
Surah 9:28-29: “O ye who believe! Truly the Pagans are unclean; so let them not, after this year of theirs, approach the Sacred Mosque. And if you fear poverty, soon will Allah enrich you, if He wills, out of His bounty, for Allah is All-knowing, All-wise. Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, even if they are of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued.” (Yusuf Ali)
Just like a common criminal, Allah is willing to murder for money (bounty and extortion) The Tafsir (Commentary) by the renowned Muslim scholar, Ibn Kathir, provides the historical context for the purpose of revealing Surah 9:28-29.
Ibn Kathir, “The Battles of the Prophet,” pp. 183-4:
“Allah, Most High, ordered the believers to prohibit the disbelievers from entering or coming near the sacred Mosque. On that, Quraish thought that this would reduce their profits from trade. Therefore, Allah, Most High, compensated them and ordered them to fight the people of the Book until they embrace Islam or pay the Jizyah.
Allah says, “O ye who believe! Truly the pagans are unclean; so let them not, after this year of theirs, approach the sacred Mosque. And if ye fear poverty, soon will Allah enrich you, if He wills, out of His bounty, for Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise. Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” (Surah 9:28-29)
Therefore, the Messenger of Allah decided to fight the Romans in order to call them to Islam.” (End of Quote)
As we have learned, the Messenger of Allah waged warfare against the Jews and the Christians not because they were attacking or planning to attack the Muslims but simply because of Allah’s commandment in Surah 9:29. Muslims are clearly authorized to wage unilateral wars against the Jews and the Christians. It was Allah’s easy solution to reimburse the Muslims. Christians who refused to convert to Islam have to pay a hefty sum as compensation for their lives. And this is not a one-off thing. The monetary compensation has to be paid on a regular basis as long as they live under the Muslim yoke. Hence, the only reason the Christians were not killed is because the Muslims needed a steady flow of cash to make up for the loss of their income. Dead Christians cannot be extorted on a regular basis. And Allah knew that. Therefore, it would be a lie to conclude that Allah was more merciful towards the Christians as Muslim apologists deceitfully claim.
This form of protection money that Allah shamelessly extorts from the Christians is known as the “Jizya” in Islam. Christians who fail to pay the “Jizya” will be put to death. Allah knew that most Christians would rather pay than convert to Islam. Thus, like a common gangster, Allah enriched the Muslims through extortion.
#Make_No_Mistake: Allah is an extortioner.
■ THE BIBLICAL STANDARD FOR TREATING FOREIGNERS
Compare the wicked attitude of Allah with the compassion of Yahweh. See how the laws that Yahweh gave to the ancient nation of Israel demonstrate his loving concern even for the foreigners who were living in their midst. The Israelites were commanded to love these foreigners as themselves. Instead of extorting, they were commanded to provide for the needs of these strangers. Please read the following verses carefully:
Deuteronomy 10:17-19: “For the Lord your God is the God of gods and Lord of Lords, the great, mighty, and awesome God, showing no partiality and taking no bribe. [18] He executes justice for the fatherless and the widow, and loves the foreigner, giving him food and clothing. [19] You also must love the foreigner, since you were foreigners in the land of Egypt.” (HCSB)
Leviticus 19:9-10: “When you reap the harvest of your land, you are not to reap to the very edge of your field or gather the gleanings of your harvest. [10] You must not strip your vineyard bare or gather its fallen grapes. Leave them for the poor and the foreign resident; I am Yahweh your God.” (HCSB)
Leviticus 19:33-34: “When a foreigner lives with you in your land, you must not oppress him. [34] You must regard the foreigner who lives with you as the native-born among you. You are to love him as yourself, for you were foreigners in the land of Egypt; I am Yahweh your God.” (HCSB)
Unlike Allah, Yahweh does not command his worshippers to extort for their livelihood. Instead, he commanded them to love the foreigners even to the extent of providing for them. These are the hallmarks of a true Creator. It is obvious that Islam cannot be the religion of the true God. Islam’s origin began on the foundation of violence. Yes, the reason Muslims kill with an untroubled conscience is because they reflect the same murderous spirit as the deity they worship. If you think Islamic terrorism is a new phenomenon, think again. The success of Islam came through terrorism. We are not the ones saying this. The prophet of Islam himself boastfully admitted to this fact.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
“I have been made victorious with terror.”
■ LOVE YOUR ENEMIES
Terror was Muhammad’s weapon of choice. In opposition to the murderous spirit of Islam, Christians are commanded to love their enemies:
Matthew 5:44-45: “But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, [45] so that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. For He causes His sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.” (HCSB)
This is some of the most profound teaching in the entire Bible. Jesus taught His followers to love their enemies. He taught them that by loving their enemies, Christians will be imitating the loving nature of their heavenly Father. In contrast, Allah made a bargain with the Muslims. He commanded Muslims to murder their enemies and promised them Paradise if they “slay and are slain” for his cause. To entice Muslims to kill, Allah also assured them that their past sins will be forgiven and they will be delivered from the “grievous suffering” of “Hell-fire.” The only definite way for a Muslim to gain salvation is through murder:
Surah 9:111: “Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs in return is the garden of Paradise: they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Qur’an: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? Then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme.” (Yusuf Ali)
Surah 61:10-13: “O you who have attained to faith! Shall I point out to you a bargain that will save you from grievous suffering? You are to believe in God and His Apostle, and to strive hard in God’s cause with your possessions and your lives: this is for your own good – if you but knew it! He will forgive you your sins, and will admit you into gardens through which running waters flow, and into goodly mansions in gardens of perpetual bliss: that will be the Supreme Triumph! And [withal, He will grant you] yet another thing that you dearly love: succor from God and a victory soon to come.” (Muhammad Asad)
According to Islamic theology, all Muslims will descend into the “Islamic-Hell” immediately upon their death. (Surah 19:70-72) And they will remain there until the Day of Resurrection. Thus, Allah made a bargain with the Muslims. Allah told them if they die fighting for his cause, he will save them from the “grievous suffering” of Hell-fire. In other words, they will be spared from the fires of the “Islamic-Hell” which all Muslims are destined to suffer until their deliverance on the Day of Resurrection. Paradise will be instant for the murdering martyrs.
Until today, Muslim suicide-killers are motivated by this murderous bargain of Allah. Allah’s bargain is still in force in the Quran. And the assurance of Paradise for those who die murdering in the name of Allah is still the standing order in the Book of Hate. The shortest route to the Islamic Paradise is through the sword:
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 52, Number 73:
“Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Abi Aufa: Allah’s Apostle said, “Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords.”
■ THE QURAN’S MURDEROUS RITE OF PASSAGE
If you have read this far and still believe that the Quran promotes peace, please let the following Quranic verse sink in:
Surah 8:67: “It is not for any Prophet to have captives until he hath made slaughter in the land.” (Pickthall)
Ibn Ishaq, who was one of the earliest biographers of Muhammad, clarified the meaning behind the chilling words of Allah in the above Quran verse.
Ibn Ishaq: 327: “Allah said, “A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.”
“Allah desires killing to manifest the religion.” Do we need to say more? Muslim terrorists are passionately satisfying the sadistic desires of Allah. Even though mankind have long transcended the primitive age of barbarism, we still find acts of barbarism in Islam. Muslim terrorists execute hundreds of their captives by beheading them without mercy. It seems to be their favorite form of execution. Are their acts of beheading a misrepresentation of Islam? Is it un-Islamic? To the contrary, the cruel practice of beheading is sanctioned by Allah in the Quran. And the ritual beheading of the enemies has a long precedent in the history and theology of Islam.
Surah 8:12: “When your Lord revealed to the angels: I am with you, therefore make firm those who believe. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.” (Shakir)
Surah 47:4: “When you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads, until you have made a great slaughter among them.” (Sale)
Compare the teaching of Allah in the Quran with the teaching of Yahweh in the Bible:
1 John 3:10-12: “This is how God’s children — and the Devil’s children — are made evident. Whoever does not do what is right is not of God, especially the one who does not love his brother. [11] For this is the message you have heard from the beginning: We should love one another, [12] unlike Cain, who was of the evil one and murdered his brother. And why did he murder him? Because his works were evil, and his brother’s were righteous.” (HCSB)
John 8:44: “You are of your father the Devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning and has not stood in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he tells a lie, he speaks from his own nature, because he is a liar and the father of liars.” (HCSB)
■ WIFE BEATING THE ISLAMIC NORM
What is absolutely important for readers to understand is the fact that violence is an integral part Islam. In Islam, violence is fostered at the very place where love should reign supreme. It begins within the family unit of the Muslims. Shamelessly, Allah authorizes wife-beating in the Quran. While wife-beating is considered a serious problem by civilized societies, the opposite is true in Islam. In Islam, it is considered as a solution, a process to administer “discipline” in matrimonial disputes. Since wife-beating is divinely ordained and justified in the Quran, Muslims cannot see it as a problem. They simply cannot see it as an act of gross violence against and violation of human sanctity:
Surah 4:34: “Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and as to those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.” (Shakir)
In contrast, Christian husbands are given the following commandment in the Bible:
Ephesians 5:25-30: “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave Himself for her [26] to make her holy, cleansing her with the washing of water by the word. [27] He did this to present the church to Himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or anything like that, but holy and blameless. [28] In the same way, husbands are to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. [29] For no one ever hates his own flesh but provides and cares for it, just as Christ does for the church, [30] since we are members of His body.” (HCSB)
The Bible does not authorize a Christian husband to beat his wife. Just as he will not entertain self harm or hurt himself, a Christian husband does not have the authority to hurt his wife. This is the kind of love that is required in a Christian marriage. This is the kind of love that a Christian husband is commanded to demonstrate towards his wife. Wife-beating is not an option in Christianity. It is forbidden. The laws of Yaweh are the laws of a loving Creator. The kind of love that is commanded to be demonstrated within the institution of a Christian marriage is too profound for Islam to understand.
Colossians 3:19: “Husbands, love your wives and don’t be bitter toward them.” (HCSB)
If it is even forbidden for a Christian husband to be bitterly angry with his wife, would he then be permitted to beat her? We can go on citing many more examples to show the contrast between the teachings of the Bible and the Quran. But we believe the above references are sufficient to help you to arrive at the right conclusion. Jesus Christ stated a vital principle in the Bible:
Matthew 7:16-18: “You’ll recognize them by their fruit. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes or figs from thistles? [17] In the same way, every good tree produces good fruit, but a bad tree produces bad fruit. [18] A good tree can’t produce bad fruit; neither can a bad tree produce good fruit.” (HCSB)
■ CONCLUSIONS
Accordingly, we can determine the true nature of Islam by observing its fruitage – by observing the kind of people it produces. We need to focus primarily on those who strictly follow the teachings of Allah in the Quran. And the fruits of Islam are violently evil. All the Islamic terror groups around the world have but one common denominator. They are all fruits of the same tree. And that tree is Islam. Moreover, Jesus taught his followers to live by the Golden Rule:
Matthew 7:12: “Therefore, whatever you want others to do for you, do also the same for them — this is the Law and the Prophets.” (HCSB)
In contrast, the Quran states:
Surah 48:29: “Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves.” (Pickthall)
The entire Quran is a violation of the Matthew 7:12 Golden Rule. Islam calls upon Muslims to do evil to others simply because they are not Muslims. The Quran has turned men into cold-blooded murderers, rapists, bandits, and terrorists. Muslims commit the most evil crimes with an untroubled conscience because these violent criminal acts are sanctioned in the Quran. The inspiration to murder comes directly from the teachings of Allah in the Quran. Islam is a culture of death and destruction. Just look at the evidence.
Look around at all the acts of violence committed by Muslims in the name of Allah inspired by the Quran and the plethora of terror groups it spawns: ISIS, Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, its affiliate group Al-Nusra Front, the Taliban, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Sunni Hezbollah in Turkey (unrelated to the Shia Hezbollah in Lebanon); the Salafist Islamic Group Ansar Al-Iskam in Iraq and Syria, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), Armed Islamic Group of Algeria (GIA), Somali group l-Itihad al-Islami (AIAI), the Somali based Wahhabi Al Shabbab group, Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen and Ansarullah Bangla, both in Bangladesh; Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed, Al Badr & Hizbul Mujahideen are militant groups seeking accession of Kashmir to Pakistan from India, the National Thowheeth Jama’ath in Sri Lanka, which carried out the 2019 Easter bombings and openly acknowledged Zakir Naik as their inspiration; the Abu Sayyaf Group in the Philippines. This is by no means an exhaustive list.
April 2018, the EU anti-terror coordinator estimated there to be 50,000 radicalized Muslims living in Europe.
Does not this teach you something about this religion? Islam is making headlines for all the wrong reasons. Do not be misled by the deception of the Muslims when the truth about Islam is crying out on the streets.
Muslim challenge arising:
A proof of the Islamic position can be shown by issuing the following simple challenge to Muslims:
1). Produce a single verse from the Quran that preaches Allah’s love for unbelievers, which Muslims are to practice.
2). Produce a single verse from the New Testament that preaches hate for, or violence towards, unbelievers or any ethnic minority.
Another proof is to compare the behaviour and lifestyle of Muhammad as held up as “model behaviour” by Islam with the pacifism of Jesus and Christian scripture. Remember it is the attitude of the founders of faith and their Scriptures that is the ultimate test of comparison.

An all loving God and hell

By Aalstair Tucker

QURAN AND BIBLE CONTRASTS (REVISITED): HOW CAN AN ALL LOVING GOD SEND PEOPLE TO HELL?
1). INTRODUCTION
# PROPOSITION: ALLAH PREDESTINES MEN FOR HELL; YHWH WILLS ALL TO BE SAVED.
When the Quran and Bible are compared so many doctrinal differences, anomalies and contradictions are evident that it’s obvious they cannot be from the same source. Nowhere is this more evident than in how the WILL of God is portrayed towards their creature men and women.
On the one hand the god of Islam is capricious and sadistic; appearing to derive pleasure in causing humanity to stray, purposefully filling Hell with those Jinns and men he predestined to perish. Moreover he gives people no clue and no certainty as to their destiny. Without atonement nor can he exercise mercy except at the expense of justice.
On the other hand, the Biblical God has ONE will and purpose – that NONE SHOULD PERISH, has provided the means that ALL should be saved, and Hell is reserved only for the devil and his fallen angels and those who fully deserve to be there.
The contrast is stark. The following references show there is only one God who respects free will and takes no pleasure in anyone perishing. Above all the Christian God is uniquely able to show mercy AND preserve justice because of atonement.
(My caps for emphasis)
□ THE QURAN
“Whomsoever Allah guides, he is the one who follows the right way; and whomsoever HE CAUSES TO ERR, THESE ARE THE LOSERS.” (Surah 7:178)
“And certainly, WE HAVE CREATED FOR HELL MANY OF THE JINN AND THE MEN; they have hearts, with which they do not understand, and they have eyes, with which they do not see, and they have ears with which they do not hear; they are as cattle, nay, they are in worse errors; these are the heedless ones.” (Surah 7:179)
“And it is not for a soul to believe except by Allah’s permission; and HE CASTS UNCLEANNESS ON THOSE WHO WILL NOT UNDERSTAND.” (Surah 10:100)
“If We had so willed, We could certainly have brought every soul its true guidance: but the Word from Me will come true, “I WILL FILL HELL WITH JINNS AND MEN ALL TOGETHER.” (Surah 32:13)
■ THE BIBLE
“Do I take any pleasure in the death of the wicked?” This is the declaration of the Lord God . “Instead, don’t I take pleasure when he turns from his ways and lives?” (Ezekiel 18:23 HCSB)
“Tell them: As I live” — the declaration of the Lord God — “I TAKE NO PLEASURE IN THE DEATH OF THE WICKED, but rather that the wicked person should turn from his way and live. Repent, repent of your evil ways! Why will you die, house of Israel?” (Ezekiel 33:11 HCSB)
“For the Son of Man has come to save the lost. What do you think? If a man has 100 sheep, and one of them goes astray, won’t he leave the 99 on the hillside and go and search for the stray? And if he finds it, I assure you: He rejoices over that sheep more than over the 99 that did not go astray. In the same way, IT IS NOT THE WILL OF YOUR FATHER IN HEAVEN THAT ONE OF THESE LITTLE ONES PERISH.” (Matthew 18:11‭-‬14 HCSB)
“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that WHOSOEVER BELIEVETH IN HIM should not perish, but have everlasting life.” (John 3:16 KJV)
“[1]. I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks be made for all men; [2]. For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. [3]. For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; [4]. WHO WILL HAVE [NKJV – “DESIRES”; HCSB – “WANTS”] ALL MEN TO BE SAVED, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. [5]. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; [6]. Who gave himself a ransom FOR ALL, to be testified in due time.” (1 Timothy 2:1-6 KJV)
“For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. For WHOSOEVER SHALL CALL UPON THE NAME OF THE LORD SHALL BE SAVED.” (Romans 10:12-13 KJV)
“The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, NOT WILLING THAT ANY SHOULD PERISH, but that all should come to repentance.” (2. Peter 3:9 KJV)
2). DISCUSSION
The background to this post is a debate on my assertion on another thread under this Post
m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10158813519528275&id=726018274
that
(i). God in the Bible is love and His love is unconditional – in contrast to the Islamic god whose love is contingent, conditional and only reciprocating (he does not initiate love).
and
(ii). That God desires that NONE shall perish, where Allah boasts that he makes people to fill hell.
A Muslim has no problem admitting:
“Of course it is unconditional love – it’s not dependent on whether the object of your affection loves you back. Unconditional means I love you with no “ifs, ands or buts.”
It’s a promising start because such a definition is not how Islam’s god expresses love. In Islamic doctrine God only loves those who first love and obey him. His love is conditional, it’s reciprocating and it’s partial. But the bigger problem comes when the Muslim is faced with the consequences of his freely made decision to respond. (As if he/she cannot cope with exercise of free will). A Muslim will dispute the concept as follows:
“because you are saying rejecting the gift [of eternal life through the cross of Jesus] has negative consequences and that’s not unconditional love, that’s blackmail and coercion. To be unconditional love literally means you can accept or reject it without consequences – not “if you reject the gift you are going to a horrible place.”
The problem here with this objection is its stopped being a free gift, something freely given and freely accepted. Because it demands acceptance it’s now an imposition, involving coercion. It’s immediately removed the right of the individual to accept or reject it. God would have to override His making mankind as free moral agents and He would be violating His sovereign justice by such an imposition.
A good place to get to the heart of the philosophical issues as to “how can an all loving God send people to an eternal hell of torture” is this debate between Dr William Lane Craig (WLC) and the atheist Dr Ray Bradley to be found here on the Reasonable Faith website. I urge all readers and apologists of whatever persuasion to read it.
www.reasonablefaith.org/media/debates/can-a-loving-god-send-people-to-hell-the-craig-bradley-debate/
WLC in his conclusions hits the nail on the head when he says:
“This problem of the doctrine of hell isn’t really for most people an intellectual problem at all. And I think that in many of the comments Dr. Bradley just made in that last speech we saw that. It’s an emotional problem. And I think that this is easily proven. How many people do you know who reject God or Christianity because of the question: “How could an all-holy and just God send people to heaven?” As a purely intellectual problem that is every bit as difficult as how an all-loving God could send people to hell. But how many people reject God or Christ because they just can’t figure out how an all-holy, all-just God could permit people to go to heaven? Nobody, right?
I think this shows that the problem is primarily emotional, not intellectual. People just don’t like the idea of a God who might send them to hell, and so they choose not to believe in Him. But that kind of attitude is just suicidal. Imagine you’re standing in the middle of the street, and suddenly a friend on the curb says, “Look out! Here comes a car!” Now what do you do? Do you stand there and close your eyes real tight and say, “anybody who would run over me can’t be a very nice person! If I don’t believe in him, then it won’t affect me! I just won’t believe that he exists!” And then it is too late. A lot of people look at God that way. They think that just because they don’t like the idea of God sending them to hell, if they close their eyes real tight and pretend that He doesn’t exist, then it doesn’t affect them. And that kind of attitude is just fatal.”
What bothers Muslims is they want to have their cake and eat it. More than that they all want to “play God”. They accuse and deny God of being able to become incarnate, and that’s just the tip of the iceberg. All Muslims boast of wanting to be able to freely reject the “door of Christ” to heaven and find the door of his own self righteousness. They forget or deny the reason why Christ is the only door in the first place. That an all loving and holy God of perfect justice, who cannot compromise His own nature, NECESSARILY must admit only those washed clean in His sight, whose sins have been paid for and God’s wrath and justice satisfied. Hence why the doctrine of atonement (totally absent in the Quran), is an ever present theme throughout the Bible. As WLC said, God’s perfect justice, His being all loving AND HIS wrath against sin came together and collided on the cross. Christ vanquished sin death and eternal separation from God. In essence LOVE CONQUERED DEATH.
That #FACT alone demolishes the intellectual basis to reject the proposition of an all loving God and eternal hell for those who reject Him, as being mutually incompatible propositions.
Another answer WLC gives in the Q&A session is on point:
“God does it for the greater good, which is to achieve this multitude of persons who come to know and experience His love and forgiveness. And what I’m saying is the fact that some people freely would choose to reject it shouldn’t be allowed to blackmail God into not being free to create a world. They shouldn’t have a veto power over what God wants to do, so long as God gives them sufficient grace to be saved as well. Their loss is the result of their own free will.”
He elaborates in another answer:
“[The theological issue is] whether a divine pardon must be accepted in order to be efficacious. Given my commitment to human freedom of the will, I think that it must. Obviously, God is not constrained by some higher law, but He is constrained by human freedom. Theologians have differed on whether God’s grace is intrinsically efficacious and so irresistible by Him upon whom it is bestowed or whether grace is extrinsically efficacious and so requires the free consent of the creaturely will in order to produce its effect. I take the latter view. God treats us as significant moral agents who make free moral choices. He would violate His own essential justice if He forced a pardon upon us.
By contrast, on the Muslim view God’s omnipotence trumps God’s justice. He can treat human beings, not as significant moral agents whose choices He respects, but as mere puppets to be manipulated by Him, and who’s destiny is predetermined by him. Here again we see the theological superiority of the Christian conception of God to the Muslim understanding.”
Because it is Christ the sinless and not we the sinner who has discharged the sentence for our sins, our redemption is not accomplished unless and until we freely receive God’s pardon. It requires of us repentance, (recognising our need for a pardon which we are powerless to earn for ourselves), and then receiving it. In contrast to the criminal who has been pardoned after fully serving his sentence, we remain in our state of judicial condemnation until we accept the pardon offered us by God. If anyone refuses the pardon offered by God, then Christ’s sacrifice avails him nothing, for he has rejected the satisfaction of God’s justice wrought by Christ. Thus, “those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness will reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ” (Romans 5.17).
A Muslim trying to argue that, by not accepting His gift of eternal life means the consequence of eternal hell is effectively “blackmail” and “coercion” in other words “you are free to choose to accept my gift but woe to you if you refuse it”, is effectively refuted by turning the argument around and correctly labelling the detractors as the blackmailers. Why should my acceptance of what a loving God chose to do for me be denied to me because some very selfish people chose not to accept it? Worse still they then have the nerve to complain at the unfair punishment they have brought upon themselves! How can they attack God after what He did to send Jesus to die the death we deserve? Yet that is effectively what all Muslims are trying to do 24/7. They mock and sneer and make excuses and pretend a God of justice can simply forgive without retribution. Muslims make God into an appeaser where there is no retribution or consequences for sin and where mercy can be exercised without any regard for justice. In other words they are recasting God in their image and that is idolatry.
3). CONCLUSIONS
No case has been shown that an all loving God and the doctrine of hell are mutually exclusive, contradictory or incompatible. God foreknew who would choose to accept His gift of eternal life and who would reject it but He desires that none shall perish (unlike the God of Islam who made men to fill hell). God in His infinite wisdom elected to make this world anyway because Jesus was always central to God’s purposes to be our salvation from eternity. (1 Peter 1:18-20; Revelation 13:8)
God knew about Satan and He made the world anyway. He made provision for Satan’s defeat and the termination of his tenure and demise are imminent. Love conquered death on the cross. Satan is defeated. Sadly many people have been blinded by him and don’t recognise his defeat, using another emotional response as an excuse that is the evil and suffering in the world.
God cannot be accused or mocked. No one who finds themselves in hell will have anyone else to blame, and those headed there in anticipation who squeal ‘it’s not fair and God cannot be all loving if He permits people to spend eternity in hell’, have no right of veto over those who make the wise choice and respond in love to our God of love. The Muslim loss, as a result of their being prisoners blinded to the consequences of exercising free will, cannot deny or be allowed to deny the rest of us who did the right thing. The only blackmail is with them not with God.
The bottom line is that God cannot compromise His nature and He cannot act contrary to His nature. Remember God is perfect love, holiness, justice and wrath (against sin and all that dishonours Him). Whether we escape His wrath is entirely up to us individually (and that means it’s not for us to concern ourselves with who goes to hell which is none of our business). Leave that to God knowing His justice is PERFECT. Amen.
God’s wrath is the obverse, converse, or reverse side of his love. Wrath is but love spurned. As Brunner puts it, “the wrath of God under which the idolatrous, sinfully perverted man stands is simply the divine love, which has become a force opposed to him who has turned against God. The wrath of God is the love of God, in the form in which the man who has turned away from God and turned against God, experiences it, as indeed, thanks to the holiness of God, he must and ought to experience it.”
Judgment is according to one’s response to the love of God in Jesus Christ (John 3:16-21, 36). But why is this? It might appear that God’s judgment is no more than the macabre revenge of a jilted suitor. If wrath is nothing more than rejected love, God is open to the following charge: “Why does he get so angry, then, when we just want to be left alone?” But there is more to the story than simply jilted love. We are God’s creatures and owe him our love and obedience. We are sinful people who have been “bought at a price” (l Corinthians 6:20). We are not autonomous beings receiving overtures of love from a neo-Marcionite God who has no more claims upon us than the romantic affections of a stranger. The love that is being spurned is the love of Creator for creature, of the One who has redeemed us at great cost. To reject such love is to turn one’s back upon one’s only hope and to consign oneself to wrath and judgment.
The bottom line is that God loves righteousness because righteousness is the very essence of God. We can NEVER attain that for ourselves.
Don’t be surprised therefore when you discover that having spurned His unconditional love to redeem you at such a heavy price you become the object of His divine wrath.
The worst words anyone can ever hear are these of Jesus who is our Lord and Judge: “away from me I never knew you” for the righteous judgment of a wrathful God is all they have left to receive, and is all they can have any right to expect.

God Will By No Means Leave The Guilty Unpunished: The Apparent Contradiction Of Exodus 34:7

1). INTRODUCTION

The issue this post seeks to clarify is simply this:

What does it mean when God says He will by no means leave the guilty unpunished? (KJV “by no means clear the guilty”)

In considering the encouraging topic of God’s forgiveness, we read one verse that is both important and puzzling (caps for emphasis):

“[5] The Lord came down in a cloud, stood with him there, and proclaimed His name Yahweh. [6] Then the Lord passed in front of him and proclaimed: Yahweh — Yahweh is a compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger and rich in faithful love and truth, [7] maintaining faithful love to a thousand generations, forgiving wrongdoing, rebellion, and sin. But HE WILL NOT LEAVE THE GUILTY UNPUNISHED, bringing the consequences of the fathers’ wrongdoing on the children and grandchildren to the third and fourth generation.” (Exodus 34:5‭-‬7 HCSB)

For the record in passing, note the LORD (in the HCSB given His correct name Yahweh), is NOT Allah and there is no linguistic contortion any Muslim can make that equates them, but that is not our focus here.

2). FORGIVENESS OR CONDEMNATION?

On the one hand, God emphasizes that it is His nature to forgive. And then He immediately follows that by saying He “will by no means leave the guilty unpunished.” Hmmm…which is it? Does God forgive, or does he refuse to clear the guilty?

A puzzling verse of apparent contradiction can sometimes best be explained with a paraphrase. God is saying: ‘I forgive the iniquity and transgression and sin of those who come to me in faith and repentance. But, toward those who refuse to repent and continue stubbornly in their sin, I will be perfectly just and will by no means clear them of guilt. In fact my justice is so thorough that I will visit the iniquity of stubborn, unrepentant sinners not only on them but also on their descendants who walk in the ways of their sinful fathers and likewise stubbornly disobey me.’

How can this interpretation be reached?

3). SCRIPTURE INTERPRETS SCRIPTURE

After the rule “Scripture must harmonise”, there is another golden rule of hermeneutics “Scripture interprets Scripture” which Muslims also ignore at their peril. A further rule, ‘context is king’ in other words ‘a verse without a context is a pretext’ is also ignored by the Muslim fraternity. All three rules once followed, allow for correct interpretation of Scripture and understanding that God is indeed not a god of confusion (such as plagues the Quran).

The Bible is its own interpreter. We don’t need any other sources to glean its truth. We don’t need a degree in Hebrew or special historical knowledge. We don’t need to know about other faiths, and we sure don’t need the Quran. We only need the Holy Spirit to convict us.

People of every race culture and creed can understand Biblical truth. We don’t need any special knowledge to understand sin, grace, forgiveness, and salvation. These are universal concepts. As the subject of this post is exemplary proof.

The best commentary on any one verse is the rest of the Scriptures. The Bible is unified truth that is ultimately from one author—God himself—and He does not contradict Himself. His revelation of His will unfolds and develops over time as a sequential narrative, and within the context of that story He does not contradict Himself (that is to say, God dealt differently with people at different points in the story of redemption).

We interpret a verse within the context of its biblical book, such is the case here in Exodus; then within the wider context of all that the human author of the book has written in the Bible, such as in this case all the writings of Moses; then within the context of the Old or New Testament story of redemption, such as in this case the Old Testament; then within the context of the entire Bible, with the New Testament being God’s final revelation of His will and ways.

4). THE TWO GROUPS: THE FORGIVEN AND THE GUILTY

So, what does the rest of the Bible teach about forgiveness? Verse 7 itself unmistakably teaches that God forgives sinners and emphasizes that by saying He forgives “iniquity and transgression and sin.” That is, He forgives everything that needs forgiving!

And God repeatedly promises forgiveness of sins under the Old Covenant to those who fulfill its obligations by confessing their sins and offering blood sacrifices at the tabernacle/temple, as taught by Moses in the Book of Leviticus. David writes in Psalm 103:2–3, “Bless the LORD, O my soul, and forget not all his benefits, who forgives all your iniquity.”

But forgiveness in the Old Testament is provisional, contingent and incomplete.

Muslims and other sceptics often argue: “Well, didn’t He forgive the Israelites before the cross?” The answer is: Yes, but only superficially and contingently.

The New Testament consistently teaches that OT forgiveness was not the same as the forgiveness that came through the Cross:

“For since the law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities, it can never, by the same sacrifices that are continually offered every year, make perfect those who draw near. Otherwise, would they not have ceased to be offered, since the worshipers, having once been cleansed, would no longer have any consciousness of sins? But in these sacrifices there is a reminder of sins every year. For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.” (Hebrews 10:1-4)

Instead of the eradication of sin, the Old Testament forgiveness merely covered over sin:

“[Jesus] whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God’s righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins.” (Romans 3:25)

Because Israel’s sins were merely “passed over,” Jesus’ atonement had to work retroactively to cleanse the sins of the OT saints:

“For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the sprinkling of defiled persons with the ashes of a heifer, sanctify for the purification of the flesh, how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to serve the living God. Therefore he is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death has occurred that redeems them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant.” (Hebrews 9:13-15)

It is only through Christ that our sins are cleansed and purified so that we can confidently enter into the presence of God (Hebrews 10:19-22). Instead, OT forgiveness was only a matter of God passing over sins, not purifying them:

“Blessed is the one whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered.” (Psalm 32:1;)

“Who is a God like you, pardoning iniquity and passing over transgression for the remnant of his inheritance?” (Micah 7:18)

The OT saints would only experience a “passing over transgression,” but they were also promised a New Covenant through which God would “remember their sins no more” (Jeremiah 31:34).

Because their sins hadn’t been eradicated, even the deceased OT saints could not come into the presence of a God whose righteousness had not yet been satisfied by the Cross:

“And all these, though commended through their faith, did not receive what was promised, since God had provided something better for us, that apart from us they should not be made perfect.” (Hebrews 11:39-40)

Consequently, after Jesus proclaimed that “It is finished” and the veil of the Temple was torn in two, symbolizing the fact that the way into presence of God was now opened, there was a great earthquake to reinforce this lesson:

“And behold, the curtain of the temple was torn in two, from top to bottom. And the earth shook, and the rocks were split. The tombs also were opened. And many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised, and coming out of the tombs after his resurrection they went into the holy city and appeared to many.” (Matthew 27:51-53)

The New Testament promises forgiveness of sins through faith in Jesus Christ. At the Last Supper, Jesus offered the cup to the disciples and said, “this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins” (Matthew 26:28).

From beginning to end in the Bible, God forgives the sins of those who confess and repent and put their faith in the shed blood offered in sacrifice, the blood of animals prior to the revelation of Jesus, and then the blood of Jesus after his sacrifice on the cross. It is no coincidence that the destruction of the temple in 70 AD brought the curtain down on temple sacrifices.

So, when Exodus 34:7 says, “He will by no means clear the guilty,” it cannot possibly mean that He forgives sinners but doesn’t “clear” them. Rather, it must mean that “the guilty” are a different group of people who have not been forgiven of “iniquity and transgression and sin.” They are “guilty” because they have not done what is necessary to be forgiven.

5). NOT LEAVING THE GUILTY UNPUNISHED/NOT CLEARING THE GUILTY

This interpretation agrees with how the word/phrase “clear the guilty” (these three words translate the one Hebrew word ‘naqah’) is used in another Old Testament passage. Nahum 1:3 says:

“The Lord is slow to anger but great in power; the Lord will never leave the guilty unpunished. His path is in the whirlwind and storm, and clouds are the dust beneath His feet.” (Nahum 1:3 HCSB)

The Book of Nahum is a prophecy against the Assyrian capital of Nineveh. God had used the wicked nation of Assyria to punish His people Judah for their long-term disobedience. Assyria had conquered Judah and taken its people into exile. But soon God would deal with idolatrous Assyria differently from those in Judah who remained faithful to Him. God would forgive those in Judah who returned to Him in repentance, but He would by no means clear the guilty nation of Assyria, for they followed idols and cruelly oppressed other nations.

This contrast between how God would deal with Judah versus how He would deal with Assyria illustrates the meaning of Exodus 34:7—“forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, but who will by no means leave the guilty unpunished/clear the guilty.”

6). OUR WAY AND GOD’S WAY

■ Our way (eg Islam): Fallen people presume that God will overlook their sins, that He can be appeased by an unholy combination of good deeds and shedding blood for His cause and they will escape judgment. They do not think God will really condemn people for even one sin. Or they give the shrug of fatalism “Allah knows best.” This is the casual way of Islam, where sins are mere mistakes which can be outweighed by good deeds and even magically transformed into good deeds! (Surah 25:68-71) Allah just shows mercy and forgives at his whim, but always without retribution and at the expense of justice.

Since there is no atonement and no vicarious sacrifice as the basis for forgiveness in Islam, the Muslim will try to find an alternative basis for Allah to show mercy. They claim he can just “blot out” sins as if they never existed, ignoring the fact that there is a tension between mercy and justice. Showing mercy at the expense of retributive justice is not the hallmark of a perfectly just God. As William Lane Craig argues: “A Judge in a criminal case “has an obligation to do justice—which means, at a minimum, an obligation to uphold the rule of law. Thus if he is moved, even by love or compassion, to act contrary to the rule of law—to the rules of justice—he acts wrongly.” That Islam’s god is morally deficient is alone enough to destroy Islam as a way to reach God.

■ God’s way (ie the Cross of Christ): God is perfectly just. He punishes all sin. He cannot overlook sins, still less just brush small sins under the rug as Allah claims to. We have the binary choice of whether our sins are punished by the death of Jesus on the Cross or by our eternal condemnation. Those who do not have their guilt removed through the blood of Jesus Christ will not be cleared by God of condemnation.

7). CONCLUSIONS

From the Old through the New Testament, God requires justice and accountability. Blood atonement has ALWAYS been the means for forgiveness. And whereas Old Testament sacrifices enabled the passing over of sins, the superior once and for all perfect sacrifice of Jesus is the only way to be permanently CLEANSED from sin and have Christ’s righteousness imputed to us.

Hebrews chapter 9 bears repeating; it sums it up perfectly:

“For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the sprinkling of defiled persons with the ashes of a heifer, sanctify for the purification of the flesh, how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to serve the living God. Therefore he is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death has occurred that redeems them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant.” (Hebrews 9:13-15)

An infinitely just and holy God cannot allow unjust and unholy people like you and me to go unpunished, still less into His presence. His plan of redemption from eternity, was simple: He punished Himself in our place. He’s the ransom. He has to judge sinners, just like a judge in a courtroom. He has to punish people that have broken the law. That is a fundamental paradigm which everyone should be able to understand, but which Islam completely ignores. Atonement in Islam is non existent and there is nothing offered in its place. Muslims have no protection from God’s wrath. Good deeds can never save you. Fasting, pilgrimages, 5x a day prayer-times observed cannot save you. They are all useless. Only the blood of Jesus saves. It’s all about what He did in love for us, it has nothing to do with our efforts.

Life principle: God will be perfectly just with you and your sins. He will either condemn you for your sins or punish Jesus for your sins. Your choice. Repent and follow Jesus and receive forgiveness; or reject Christ, die in your sins, and stand at the Judgment seat of Christ someday to give account for every wrong you have ever committed.

Bottom line: Muslims you need to act now before its too late. Thank me later.

Make No Mistake: #HisWrathFallsOnTheUnsaved #JesusBloodAtones

Messianic prophecies Comments

Manus Lia “proskuneo” worshipped.

And again, when God brings his firstborn into the world, he says, ‘Let all God’s angels worship him.’ … But about the Son he says, ‘Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever, Hebrews 1:6, 8-9

In the earliest citations of the Septuagint , Justin Martyr, writing around 155-160 AD, quoted it as:
“Rejoice, O heavens, with him, and let all the angels of God worship him. Rejoice, O nations, with his people, let all the angels of God prevail for him,

In Isaiah 9:1-6 there is a messianic prophecy which certainly does point toward the Messiah being more than just a prophet and great spiritual leader. This prophecy is that the Messiah would come from the land of Zebulun and Naphtali. It just so happens that Nazareth is right on the border between the regions given to Zebulun and Naphtali.
The prophecy continues to identify the Messiah as a child who is born who will be called “Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father and Prince of Peace.”

The Hebrew words:
What makes this rather intriguing is that all of these words are used in relation to the worship, service, and bowing that believers are to render to God.
According to the following Psalm all the nations will worship and serve God’s Messianic King:
“All kings will bow down to him and all nations will serve him.” Psalm 72:9-11

Hebrew “Kara”
“When Solomon had finished praying this entire prayer and supplication to the LORD, he arose from before the altar of the LORD, from kneeling on his knees with his hands spread toward heaven.” 1 Kings 8:54
“All the rich of the earth will feast and worship; all who go down to the dust will kneel before him— those who cannot keep themselves alive.” Psalm 22:29

Hebrew “Shachah”
“All the ends of the earth will remember and turn to the LORD, and all the families of the nations will bow down before him,” Psalm 22:27
“All the nations you have made will come and worship before you, O Lord; they will bring glory to your name.” Psalm 86:9
“Worship the LORD in the splendor of his holiness; tremble before him, all the earth.” Psalm 96:9
“All who worship images are put to shame, those who boast in idols — worship him, all you gods!” Psalm 97:7

Hebrew”Avad”
“Serve the LORD with fear and rejoice with trembling.” Psalm 2:11
“Posterity will serve him; future generations will be told about the Lord.” Psalm 22:30
“Worship the LORD with gladness; come before him with joyful songs.” Psalm 100:2

Some of these terms even appear together in connection with the worship given to YHWH.
For instance, here are a couple of texts where believers are forbidden from rendering “shachah” and “avad” to any other god besides the one true God:
“You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me,” Exodus 20:3-5
“When the LORD made a covenant with the Israelites, he commanded them: ‘Do not worship any other gods or bow down to them, serve them or sacrifice to them.’” 2 Kings 17:35

As renowned Messianic Jewish scholar Dr. Michael L. Brown put it:
… Many times in the psalms, the Lord and His anointed king are described in equally exalted terms, and similar reverence is required for both. Consider these following clear parallels (which I have translated for greater clarity): In Psalm 83:18, God is “the Most High over all the earth,” while in Psalm 89:28, it is the Davidic king, designated significantly as “firstborn,” who has been appointed “the most h…
[

Manus Lia Is Jesus the Creator?

The New Testament

Genesis 1:1 says that “God created the heavens and the earth.” Then, Colossians 1:16 gives the added detail that God created “all things” through Jesus Christ. The plain teaching of Scripture, therefore, is that Jesus is the Creator of the universe.

For by Him [Jesus] all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him (Colossians 1:16).
Paul reveals several important things in this passage:

  1. Jesus is the exact image of God
  2. Jesus is the “first-born” of creation
  3. Jesus created everything
  4. Jesus is the reason for creation
  5. Jesus existed before everything
  6. Jesus holds creation together

There’s one God three persons and Jesus is the second member of the Trinity that created all things. For him and by him.

Hebrews 1:2 says, “In these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom also he made the universe.” Christ is the agent of God’s creation.

All things were made through [Jesus], and without [Jesus] was not anything made that was made” (John 1:3)

By the word of the LORD the heavens were made, their starry host by the breath of his mouth” (Psalm 33:6).
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word (Jesus) was God” (John 1:1).

Hebrews indicates that God the father calls Jesus, the Son, God:
But to the Son He says: “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever; A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your Kingdom. You have loved righteousness and hated lawlessness; Therefore God, Your God, has anointed You with the oil of gladness more than Your companions” (Hebrews 1:8–9).

The Old Testament

This is what the Lord, the Creator and Holy One of Israel says…I am the one who made the earth and created people to live on it. With my hands I stretched out the heavens. All the millions of stars are at my command….I, the LORD Almighty, have spoken!” (Isaiah 45:11a, 12, 13b)

By the word of the LORD the heavens were made, their starry host by the breath of his mouth” (Psalm 33:6).

Source:
²F. F. Bruce, The Deity of Christ (Manchester, England: Wright’s [Sandbach] Ltd., 1964

Death Could Not Stop Them

In chapter 5 of Acts, we find a Pharisee named Gamaliel rather presciently predicting the rise of Christianity when he convinced his fellow Pharisees to leave Peter and the other apostles alone at one point.

But first to set the scene, earlier in Acts chapter 5 we read how the Apostles had been jailed (v 18) for doing nothing more than healing “multitudes” from within Jerusalem (v14) and “a multitude” brought from surrounding cities (v16). But an angel of the Lord had sprung the Apostles from prison (v19) and commanded them to “Go, stand in the temple and speak to the people all the words of this life.” (v20) Having found them still “standing in the temple teaching the people”, they were again arrested and brought back before the high priest. (v26-27) He charged them: “Did we not strictly command you not to teach in this name? And look, you have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this Man’s blood on us!” (v28)

But Peter (the same Peter who had fled the scene of Jesus arrest), and the other apostles answered and said: “We ought to obey God rather than men. The God of our fathers raised up Jesus whom you murdered by hanging on a tree. Him God has exalted to His right hand to be Prince and Savior, to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins. And we are His witnesses to these things, and so also is the Holy Spirit whom God has given to those who obey Him.” (v29‭-‬32)

At the point where the high priest and council are plotting to kill the Apostles (v33) is where Gamaliel intervenes:

“And he [Gamaliel] said, “Men of Israel, consider carefully what you intend to do to these men. Some time ago, Theudas appeared, claiming to be somebody, and about four hundred men rallied to him. He was killed, all his followers dispersed, and it all came to nothing. After him, Judas the Galilean appeared in the days of the census and led a band of people in revolt. He too was killed, and all his followers scattered. Therefore, in the present case I advise you: Leave these men alone! Let them go! For if their purpose or activity is of human origin, it will fail. But if it is from God, you will not be able to stop these men; you will only find yourselves fighting against God” (Acts 5:35-39).

Fast forwarding some 300 years later, by 313 AD, when Constantine legalized Christianity, the number of Christians was already between five and six million (Wawro, 2008). This in spite of massive persecution and two centuries of killing of Christians in Rome from the great fire in 64 AD under Nero to the empire wide persecution of 250 AD under Decius.

□ More on early Christian persecution under Roman rule.

For almost three hundred years, Christianity grew in soil that was wet with the blood of the martyrs.

Until the Emperor Trajan (about AD 98), persecution was permitted but not legal. From Trajan to Decius (about AD 250), persecution was legal. From Decius, who hated the Christians and feared their impact on his reforms, until the first edict of toleration in 311, the persecution was not only legal but widespread and general.

One writer described the situation in this third period:

“Horror spread everywhere through the congregations; and the number of lapsi [the ones who renounced their faith when threatened] . . . was enormous. There was no lack, however, of such as remained firm, and suffered martyrdom rather than yielding; and, as the persecution grew wider and more intense, the enthusiasm of the Christians and their power of resistance grew stronger and stronger.

So, for three hundred years, to be a Christian was an act of immense risk to your life and possessions and family. It was a test of what you loved more. And at the extremity of that test was martyrdom.

And above that martyrdom was a sovereign God who said there is an appointed number of martyrs. They have a special role to play in planting and empowering the church. They have a special role to play in shutting the mouth of Satan, who constantly says that the people of God serve him only because life goes better. That’s the point of Job 1:9–11.

Martyrdom is not something accidental. It is not taking God off guard. It is not unexpected. And it is emphatically not a strategic defeat for the cause of Christ.

It may look like defeat. But it is part of a plan in heaven that no human strategist would ever conceive or could ever design. And this plan will triumph for all those who endure to the end by faith in God’s all-sufficient grace.”
(From “The Desk Desiring God” ~ John Piper)

Stopping the clock right there in 313 AD would our Muslim friends agree with Gamaliel, that trying to stop the preaching of the Gospel had proved futile because as he rightly observed, if they were from God, it would indeed be fighting “against God”? By the time Muhammad appeared on the scene, a few hundred years further on still, Christianity was already an unstoppable movement. It is a pity that Muhammad did not take the same advice given by Gamaliel, when he declared war on Jews and Christians.

Because Christianity is from God, it is unstoppable. In spite of 1300 centuries of persecution and Islamic inspired defamation it remains the world’s largest faith and has adherents in every country of the world. It is not geographically limited to a single region or a few regions of the world as is the case with many other faiths. It is not based on the words of a single man from a single generation as Islam is.

The Bible remains unscathed and inviolable; the word of God has been translated into more languages and sold more copies than any other book in history. (At 5 billion copies, more than 6 times as many Bibles than its nearest challenger the Quran at circa 800 million). Written by forty authors, many of whom were martyred for their beliefs, it was compiled over a period of fifteen hundred years and across three continents. Only God could inspire and administer such a mammoth task. No one was able to stop the Apostles and early Christian disciples, despite cutting short their lives and their messages by martyring them. No one was able to stop their leader, Jesus, despite cutting his life short via the crucifixion. No one was able to thwart His multiply predicted resurrection in spite of the best laid plan to secure the tomb. Having failed in that, no one was able to stop the spread of the story of the resurrection and empty tomb in spite of a botched attempt to bribe the guards with the widely reported story that the disciples stole the body. And to this day in spite of millions of Christians suffering persecution, no one will ever be able to take the glory of the Lord away from our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.

“I have told you these things, so that in me, you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world” (John 16:33).

Muslims should take note: as the wise Pharisee Gamaliel warned: what is from God can never be stopped and trying to do so is indeed fighting against God Himself.

Atonement Of Sins Through Blood

An Islamist made this comment: “……show me a single unambiguous verse in the complete Bible where God says that Jesus Christ pbuh will die on the cross for your sins…….”

OUR RESPONSE:

Luke 24:44-47 “Then he told them, “These are the words that I spoke to you while I was still with you”that everything written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms had to be fulfilled.” Then he opened their minds so that they might understand the Scriptures. He told them, “This is how it is written: the Messiah was to suffer and rise from the dead on the third day, and then repentance and forgiveness of sins is to be proclaimed in his name to all the nations, beginning at Jerusalem.”

Matthew 20:18-19 “See, we are going up to Jerusalem, and the Son of Man will be handed over to the high priests and scribes, and they will condemn him to death. Then they will hand him over to the gentiles to be mocked, whipped, and crucified, but on the third day he will be raised.”

Matthew 26:28 “this is my blood, which seals God’s covenant, my blood poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.

Atonement by Blood & Significance Of Blood In Atonement Of Sins

Exodus 24: 5 Then he sent young men, and they burned sacrifices to the LORD and sacrificed some cattle as fellowship offerings. 6 Moses took half of the blood of the animals and put it in bowls; and the other half he threw against the altar. 7 Then he took the book of the covenant, in which the LORD’s commands were written, and read it aloud to the people. They said, “We will obey the LORD and do everything that he has commanded.” 8 Then Moses took the blood in the
bowls and threw it on the people. He said, “THIS IS THE BLOOD THAT SEALS THE COVENANT which the LORD made with you when he gave all these commands.”

Exodus 30: 10 Once a year Aaron is to perform the ritual for purifying the altar by putting on its four projections the blood of the animal sacrificed for sin. This is to be done every year for all time to come. This altar is to be completely holy, dedicated to me, the LORD.”

John 1:29 The next day he saw Jesus coming to him and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!

CASE CLOSED!

Using Logic To Prove That God Is Triune

One of the 24 rules of correct Bible interpretation is called the ‘rule of necessary inference’. Some things in the Bible are not directly stated in the words we might wish or choose to use to express the truth it reveals, but by necessary inference, we can legitimately derive such truths from what is said.

Careful study of Scripture demonstrates that all three (and only these three and no others), that is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are persons of the Godhead, who are associated on an equality of being, and possess the attributes and prerogatives of Deity.

Consider these facts stated in the Bible:

The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (or Holy Ghost, KJV) are each called God.

1.1. The Father is called God:

“Is this how you repay the Lord, you foolish and senseless people? Isn’t He your Father and Creator? Didn’t He make you and sustain you? Remember the days of old; consider the years long past. Ask your father, and he will tell you, your elders, and they will teach you.”
(Deuteronomy 32:6‭-‬7)

“Yet You are our Father, even though Abraham does not know us and Israel doesn’t recognize us. You, Yahweh, are our Father; from ancient times, Your name is our Redeemer.” (Isaiah 63:16)

“Don’t work for the food that perishes but for the food that lasts for eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you, because God the Father has set His seal of approval on Him.” (John 6:27)

[See also: Galatians 1:1, 3; Ephesians 6:23; Philippians 2:11; Colossians 2:2; 1 Thessalonians 1:1; 2 Timothy 1:2; Titus 1:4; 2 Peter 1:17; Jude 1:1. These are some of the very passages that Muslims often cite when claiming Jesus is not God.]

1.2. The Son is called God:

“Thomas responded to Him, “My Lord and my God! ” (John 20:28)

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” (John 1:1)

“The Word became flesh and took up residence among us. We observed His glory, the glory as the One and Only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.” (John 1:14)

“The ancestors are theirs, and from them, by physical descent, came the Messiah, who is God over all, praised forever. Amen.” (Romans 9:5)

“while we wait for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.” (Titus 2:13)

“but to the Son: Your throne, God, is forever and ever, and the scepter of Your kingdom is a scepter of justice.” (Hebrews 1:8)

“Simeon Peter, a slave and an apostle of Jesus Christ: To those who have obtained a faith of equal privilege with ours through the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ.” (2 Peter 1:1)

1.3. The Holy Spirit is called God:

“Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness covered the surface of the watery depths, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the surface of the waters.” (Genesis 1:2)

“Then Peter said, “Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and keep back part of the proceeds from the field? Wasn’t it yours while you possessed it? And after it was sold, wasn’t it at your disposal? Why is it that you planned this thing in your heart? You have not lied to men but to God! ”
(Acts 5:3‭-‬4)

“because no prophecy ever came by the will of man; instead, men spoke from God as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.” (2 Peter 1:21)

2). The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are each called Lord:

2.1. The Father is called Lord:

“For the Lord your God is the God of gods and Lord of Lords, the great, mighty, and awesome God, showing no partiality and taking no bribe.” (Deuteronomy 10:17)

“for there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, since the same Lord of all is rich to all who call on Him.” (Romans 10:12)

2.2. The Son is called Lord:

“Today a Savior, who is Messiah the Lord, was born for you in the city of David.” (Luke 2:11)

“Why do you call Me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and don’t do the things I say?” (Luke 6:46)

“Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord! ’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of My Father in heaven.”
(Matthew 7:21)

“When Jesus had washed their feet and put on His robe, He reclined again and said to them, “Do you know what I have done for you? You call Me Teacher and Lord. This is well said, for I am. So if I, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another’s feet.” (John 13:12‭-‬14)

“For some men, who were designated for this judgment long ago, have come in by stealth; they are ungodly, turning the grace of our God into promiscuity and denying Jesus Christ, our only Master and Lord.” (Jude 1:4)

2.3. The Holy Spirit is called Lord:

“Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. We all, with unveiled faces, are looking as in a mirror at the glory of the Lord and are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory; this is from the Lord who is the Spirit.” (2 Corinthians 3:17‭-‬18)

3). The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are each called or said to be everlasting:

3.1. The Father is called everlasting:

“Before the mountains were brought forth, Or ever You had formed the earth and the world, Even from everlasting to everlasting, You are God.” (Psalms 90:2)

“Have you not known? Have you not heard? The everlasting God, the Lord, The Creator of the ends of the earth, Neither faints nor is weary. His understanding is unsearchable.” (Isaiah 40:28)

“but now made manifest, and by the prophetic Scriptures made known to all nations, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, for obedience to the faith” .. (Romans 16:26)

“And He said to me, “It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. I will give water as a gift to the thirsty from the spring of life.” (Revelation 21:6)

3.2. The Son is called everlasting:

“For unto us a Child is born, Unto us a Son is given; And the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.” (Isaiah 9:6)

“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, Though you are little among the thousands of Judah, Yet out of you shall come forth to Me The One to be Ruler in Israel, Whose goings forth are from of old, From everlasting.” (Micah 5:2)

“Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.” (John 8:58)

“And now, O Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world was.” (John 17:5)

“Father, I desire that they also whom You gave Me may be with Me where I am, that they may behold My glory which You have given Me; for You loved Me before the foundation of the world.” (John 17:24)

“Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever.” (Hebrews 13:8)

“When I saw Him, I fell at His feet like a dead man. He laid His right hand on me and said, “Don’t be afraid! I am the First and the Last,”
(Revelation 1:17)

“I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last.” (Revelation 22:13)

3.3. The Holy Spirit may be said to be eternal or everlasting:

“And I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Counselor to be with you forever.” (John 14:16)

“how much more will the blood of the Messiah, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without blemish to God, cleanse our consciences from dead works to serve the living God?” (Hebrews 9:14)

4). God the Father, as well as Jesus Christ His Son, and the Holy Spirit are each Omniscient

4.1. The Father is omniscient:

“No creature is hidden from Him, but all things are naked and exposed to the eyes of Him to whom we must give an account.” (Hebrews 4:13)

4.2. The (Risen) Son is omniscient:

“He asked him the third time, “Simon, son of John, do you love Me? ” Peter was grieved that He asked him the third time, “Do you love Me? ” He said, “Lord, You know everything! You know that I love You.” “Feed My sheep,” Jesus said.” (John 21:17)

[This is asserted or demonstrated further in a number of passages of Scripture: John 2:24-25; John 4:16; John 5:6; John 5:42; John 6:61, 64; John 11:14 (Jesus knew days before he arrived that Lazarus was dead); Matthew 17:24-27, and many more passages. At a topical level Jesus predicted His betrayal trial death and resurrection, often in chilling detail, at least 2 dozen times:
http://www.o-bible.com/BiblicalInformation/index.html#!JESUS-PREDICTS-HIS-OWN-DEATH-AND-RESURRECTION

See also this post which established that Jesus omniscient attributes overwhelmingly established His deity:

https://apologetics.stevenson.cc/trinity/proofs-of-jesus-divinity-omniscience-trinity/proofs-of-jesus-divinity-omniscience-3/

4.3. The Holy Spirit is omniscient:

“Now God has revealed these things to us by the Spirit, for the Spirit searches everything, even the depths of God.” (1 Corinthians 2:10)

CONCLUSIONS

Only God is omniscient. Since Jesus Christ is both declared and demonstrated to be omniscient, by the rule of necessary inference, Jesus Christ must be God, that is, He always has been divine, or deity, in His eternal position as God the Son.

And again since all the attributes shared as set out above are features of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, again by the same rule we have established that God is triune.

God desires that we use our intellects to logically reason, discern and establish with the teaching of the Holy Spirit the truth of His word.

May this post help to convict sceptics, especially those that are unreasonably prejudiced against a triune God and above all may it glorify His name. Amen.

Abraham’s Sacrifice: A Foreshadowing Of The Crucifixion

Some Questions for all to ponder as you read this Post:

  • Are the reported sacrifices of Isaac and of Jesus related?
  • Are they narrative-tied?
  • Does one of these events unfold with the other in mind?
  • Does the sacrificing of Isaac prefigure or foreshadow Jesus’s? (Or alternatively, does the sacrificing of Jesus refer back to the sacrificing of Isaac?)

The Premise is YES, AFTER ALL…

BOTH ARE PROMISED-CHILDS, MIRACULOUSLY CONCEIVED

In their respective accounts, both Jesus and Isaac are promised-childs, miraculously conceived gifts from God (neither mother was supposed to be able to give birth but for differing reasons, Sarah because of age and Mary because she was a virgin). This is relevant because few figures share this property, and it is central to both Jesus and Isaac.

Verses on Jesus being miraculously conceived:

• Luke 1:30-35: “The angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary; for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall name Him Jesus. … Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I am a virgin?” The angel answered … the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy Child shall be called the Son of God.”

Verses on Isaac being miraculously conceived:

• Genesis 18:9-10: “[The angels] said to him, … “…behold, Sarah your wife will have a son.” … Now Abraham and Sarah were old, advanced in age; Sarah was past childbearing. Sarah laughed to herself…”

• Genesis 21:1-4: “and the Lord did for Sarah as He had promised. So Sarah conceived and bore a son to Abraham in his old age,… Now Abraham was one hundred years old when his son Isaac was born to him.”

Aside from Isaac and Jesus, there are only six other miraculous births in the Bible, the others being Jacob & Esau, Samson, the Shunammite woman‘s son (2 Kings 4), Samuel, and John the Baptist.

BOTH ARE CALLED THEIR FATHER’S SPECIAL “ONLY SON”

In both stories, Jesus and Isaac are explicitly identified as their father’s special “one and only son.” This is relevant because few father-son relationships are described this way in the Biblical texts, and yet this unique specialness of the son to their father is central to both the story of Isaac and Jesus.

Verses on Jesus being God’s “only son”:

• John 3:16: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son,”
• Romans 8:32: “He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him over”
• Romans 5:10: “we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son”
• 1 John 4:9-10: “God sent his only Son … he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.”

Verses on Isaac being Abraham’s “only son”:

• Genesis 22:2 — “Take now your son, your only son, whom you love, Isaac, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I will tell you.” v12 — “…you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me.”

BOTH ARE TO BE SACRIFICED BY THEIR LOVING FATHER

In their respective accounts, both Jesus and Isaac were to be sacrificed by their father. This is relevant because few figures in story or history share this property, and yet it is a defining feature of Isaac and Jesus.

Verses on Jesus being sacrificed by his loving Father:

• John 4:9-10: “God sent his only Son … he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.”
• John 3:16: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son,”
• Romans 8:32: “He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him overVerses on Isaac being sacrificed by his loving Father.”
• Genesis 22:2: “Take now your son, your only son, whom you love, Isaac, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I will tell you.”

–BOTH ARE TO BE SACRIFICED IN THE SAME PLACE (MORIAH)

In their respective accounts, Jesus and Isaac were to be sacrificed in the same location (hills of Moriah). This is relevant because no other Biblical figures share this property, and God commanded Abraham to travel about 50 miles to sacrifice Isaac at just this location, without ever offering an explanation. (It is as if God expected something special to happen there later?)

Verses on Jesus being crucified in the location of Moriah:

• John 19:17: “They took Jesus, therefore, and He went out, bearing His own cross, to the place called the Place of a Skull, which is called in Hebrew, Golgotha.” (cf. Mk 15:22, Mt 27:33, Lk 23:33) This is relevant because this hill (Golgotha) was a hill of Moriah. We know this because the hill Golgotha and the Temple (in Jerusalem) were 300 meters apart, with the latter being built on a hill in Moriah (called Mt. Moriah), and the former also being a hill in Moriah (part of the same range).
• 2 Chronicles 3:1: “Then Solomon began to build the house of the Lord in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah, where the Lord had appeared to his father DavidVerses on Isaac being Abraham’s “only son”:”
• Genesis 22:2: “Take now your son, your only son, whom you love, Isaac, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I will tell you.”

BOTH ARE TO BE A SACRIFICIAL LAMB TO GOD (ON WOOD)

In their respective accounts, both Jesus and Isaac were to be sacrificial lambs to God.

We know Jesus was meant to be a sacrificial lamb for two reasons:

• Jesus was crucified during passover, which is when Jews were to sacrifice their unblemished lamb.

Texts report it explicitly:

• John 1:29: “The next day he saw Jesus coming to him and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world! (v. 36 — and he looked at Jesus as He walked, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God!”)”
• 1 Peter 1:18: “knowing that you were not redeemed with perishable things… but with precious blood, as of a lamb unblemished and spotless, the blood of Christ.”

We know Isaac was meant to be a sacrificial lamb because of context:

• Genesis 22:1,7-8: “offer him there as a burnt offering… Isaac spoke to Abraham his father and said, “My father!” And he said, “Here I am, my son.” And he said, “Behold, the fire and the wood, but where is the lamb for the burnt offering?” Abraham said, “God will provide for Himself the lamb for the burnt offering, my son.” So the two of them walked on together.”

BOTH CARRY THEIR OWN WOOD UP ON THEIR BACK TO DIE ON

In their respective accounts, both Jesus and Isaac were ironically expected to carry the very wood up the hill that they were to be sacrificed on. This is relevant because no other Biblical figures share this property, and it is one of the few details given on the story of Isaac’s being sacrificed, while also prominently featuring in the account of Jesus’s death.

• Genesis 22:6: “Abraham took the wood and laid it on Isaac, and he took in his hand the fire and the knife. So the two of them walked on together.”

We know this because:

• Victims of crucifixion in general were expected to carry their cross as far as possible.

• It is reported explicitly in John 19:16-17: “So he then handed Him over to them to be crucified. They took Jesus, therefore, and He went out, bearing His own cross, to the place called the Place of a Skull.”

BOTH VOLUNTARILY SUBMITTED TO THEIR BEING SACRIFICED

In their respective accounts, both Jesus and Isaac (much stronger than Abraham) submitted to their father’s will to be sacrificed, without resisting. This is relevant because it is hardly expected in such a case, and yet is an essential and unique characteristic of how Jesus and Isaac went to die.

We know Jesus did not resist for two reasons:

• The reports of Jesus’ death are numerous and details, and yet there is no indication that he tried resisting.

• Quite the contrary, the reports consistently identify him as not resisting (not in his arrest [Matthew 26:50] or in his trial either).

• Acts 8:32, 35 — “He was led as a sheep to slaughter; and as a lamb before its shearer is silent”… Then Philip opened his mouth, and beginning from this Scripture he preached Jesus to him.

• Matthew 26:50: “And Jesus said to him, “Friend, do what you have come for.” Then they came and laid hands on Jesus and seized Him.”

Isaac was perfectly capable of fighting back (he was the one who carried all the wood up on his back). There is no record of any struggle or that he resisted in any way.

BOTH NARRATIVES CONCLUDE: GOD WILL PROVIDE

In both the story of Jesus and Isaac,  the account ends with the message that “God will provide,” specifically he will provide sacrificial replacement so his loved ones do not. This is relevant because, while the analogue to Jesus shifts from Isaac to the ram, this was necessary to incorporate the final element: the substitionary death. The text emphasizes the ram was killed “in the place of his son.” The text really seemed to want to highlight this feature, saying they sacrificed the ram “in Isaac’s place”; the story needed to say that.

In the case for Jesus, he is sacrificed and dies for our sins.

• Romans 3:25: “God presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement, through the shedding of his blood–to be received by faith.”
• Genesis 22:12-14: “[God] said, “Do not stretch out your hand against [Isaac],….” Then Abraham raised his eyes and looked, and behold, behind him a ram caught in the thicket by his horns; and Abraham went and took the ram and offered him up for a burnt offering in the place of his son. Abraham called the name of that place The Lord Will Provide, as it is said to this day, “In the mount of the Lord it will be provided.”

BOTH FATHERS ANTICIPATED THEIR SON’S RESURRECTION

In both stories, Jesus and Isaac were expected by their fathers to be resurrected by God.

Jesus’s father in this case is God, who being omniscient knew. Several texts also testify to God’s awareness.There are two reasons to think Abraham believed this of Isaac:

• Abraham did not object, and Isaac did not resist. By extension he in turn trusted his earthly father.
• The whole situation was a test of Abraham’s faith in God’s promise just before:

• Genesis 21:21: “God said… ‘it is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned.’”
• Genesis 17:9: “Yes, but your wife Sarah will bear you a son, and you will call him Isaac. I will establish my covenant with him as an everlasting covenant for his descendants after him.”

In other words, insofar as Abraham believed both…
• …that he would kill Isaac
• …that Isaac would live on to have children and continue Abraham’s line,
Abraham seemingly had to trust God would raise Isaac from death. This was noticed by Jews long before.

• Hebrews 11:17-19: “By faith Abraham, when God tested him, offered Isaac as a sacrifice. He who had embraced the promises was about to sacrifice his one and only son, even though God had said to him, “It is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned.”
Abraham reasoned that God could even raise the dead, and so in a manner of speaking he did receive Isaac back from death.”

BOTH NARRATIVES INVOLVE A SUBSTITUTIONARY SACRIFICE

Here the Muslim and other sceptics will say “Ah, but they aren’t the same because Isaac was rescued …”

ISAAC DIDN’T DIE

Unlike Jesus, Isaac did not actually die. (He lived to ripe old age and was 180 years old when he died – Genesis 35:28-29). Instead, at this indeterminate age as a young man, he was spared. This is relevant because the death of Jesus is essential to his narrative, and it is missing from the story of Isaac.

However, unless God was going to permit the death of Isaac gratuitously simply to mirror exactly the crucifixion, wasn’t this the best way to do things from a foreshadowing or prefiguring perspective?

After all, which is better:

(a) A prefiguring where Jesus and Isaac are in parallel to their end and where finally Isaac too is killed, but no notion of substitutionary death provided by God is involved as in the Jesus story. In which case BOTH deaths would have been needless and pointless.

Or

(b) A prefiguring where Jesus and Isaac parallel, yet where Isaac is not killed, and in its place is the parallel of a substitutionary death provided by God: the Ram. The SUBSTITUTIONARY sacrifice by Christ’s death then, rather than being pointless, on the contrary is a GLORIOUS death offering us all hope.

[Note: Also included is the foreshadowing in Genesis of Abraham saying God would provide the “Lamb.” This is relevant because instead only a Ram is provided in the story, leading many theologians to point out an ostensible implication that the foretold Lamb sacrifice on Moriah is still to come.]

Footnote:

The Quran while it has mention of Abraham’s sacrifice of his son is incomplete on several key points. Firstly, it fails to mention the name of the son, leading to conjecture that it was Ishmael not Isaac.

Secondly and even more remiss, it fails to mention any reason for the sacrifice. Its symbolism is completely lost on any Muslim reader.

The purpose of sacrificing his son is left unexplained. From Tabari II:84 we read:

“When Abraham was told to sacrifice Isaac, Satan said, ‘By Allah, if I cannot deceive the people with this, I shall never be able to do it.’”

Satan not only swears by Allah, he says that the bogus connection between Abraham and Islam is his best way to fool mankind. He was right! It’s also interesting that the deception would be over sacrifice. Judaism, Christianity, and all rational civilizations use sacrifice as the means to promote justice and maintain spiritual or societal order. Commit a crime and you will be required to sacrifice your money, your freedom, or your life. If crime is without cost, anarchy reigns.

In Judaism, the sacrificial rite for the forgiveness of sin was rich in symbolism. It was based upon the “Mercy Seat” of the Arc of the Covenant. And it was connected prophetically to the blood of an unblemished lamb or dove. It’s all explained in the Torah. In Christianity, Christ became the perfect lamb and sacrificed himself on our behalf.

But in Islam, there is no sacrifice. While the Sunnah perpetuates Qusayy ‘s senseless slaughter, it’s for appeasement, not atonement. There is no symbolism, no prophetic implication, no retribution, no justice and no moral reason, as forgiveness is capricious in Islam. And that’s why totalitarian governments use draconian measures to maintain order. Muhammad was an amoral thief empowered by situational scriptures, so he failed to appreciate the necessity of sacrifice and he never understood the Biblical concept of sacrificial atonement.

It’s why the “ransom of great sacrifice” mentioned in the Quran is left unexplained. So much for an all sufficient book. To really understand the significance and purpose of Abraham’s sacrifice you have to read the Biblical account and compare it to the event it foreshadowed which is the Crucifixion.

Only The Blood Of Jesus Saves Us (Islam Cannot)

1). INTRODUCTION

The Bible has what is euphemistically called a “crimson thread” of atonement pulsing through it like a heartbeat.

Right from the moment of Adam and Eve’s first sin, blood had been shed to cover it.

“The Lord God made clothing out of skins for Adam and his wife, and He clothed them.” (Genesis 3:21)

Animals had to be sacrificed and their blood shed that the shamefulness of sin might be covered. This illustration prefigures the ultimate sacrifice of the cross and sets the tone for the entire canon of Scripture. It is foundational for a proper understanding of the seriousness of sin and what God did by His grace to redeem us. (Not what we did to save ourselves which is impossible).

Its no coincidence that the Quran does away with atonement. There is quite simply no legal, moral or just basis for forgiveness in Islam – period. Then again Islam doesn’t acknowledge that sin separates us from God and it falsely assumes we are innocent at birth. Sins are mere mistakes rectifiable by good deeds and sins can even be transformed into good deeds! (Surah 25:68-71)

This is how sin is trivialised in Islamic theology, and conveniently makes the doctrine of atonement redundant. We should not fall for it. Our first parents fell and we have to deal with the consequences of that, without falling into the snare of Islamic heresy.

2). COULD GOD HAVE FORGIVEN US WITHOUT THE ATONEMENT OF JESUS?

Muslims and other sceptics argue: “Well, didn’t God forgive the Israelites before the cross?”

Answer: Yes, but only superficially and contingently.

The New Testament consistently teaches that OT forgiveness was not the same as the forgiveness that came through the Cross. Read the whole of the book of Hebrews, it’s a Muslim no go area, for a proper understanding of why the Cross is infinitely superior to the daily temple sacrifices.

“For since the law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities, it can never, by the same sacrifices that are continually offered every year, make perfect those who draw near. Otherwise, would they not have ceased to be offered, since the worshipers, having once been cleansed, would no longer have any consciousness of sins? But in these sacrifices there is a reminder of sins every year. For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.” (Hebrews 10:1-4)

Instead of the eradication of sin, the Old Testament forgiveness merely covered over sin:

“[Jesus] whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God’s righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins.” (Romans 3:25)

Because Israel’s sins were merely “passed over,” Jesus’ atonement had to work retroactively to cleanse the sins of the OT saints:

“For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the sprinkling of defiled persons with the ashes of a heifer, sanctify for the purification of the flesh, how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to serve the living God. Therefore he is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death has occurred that redeems them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant.” (Hebrews 9:13-15)

It is only through Christ that our sins are cleansed and purified so that we can confidently enter into the presence of God (Hebrews 10:19-22). Instead, OT forgiveness was only a matter of God passing over sins, not purifying them:

“Blessed is the one whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered.” (Psalm 32:1;)

“Who is a God like you, pardoning iniquity and passing over transgression for the remnant of his inheritance?” (Micah 7:18)

The OT saints would only experience a “passing over transgression,” but they were also promised a New Covenant through which God would “remember their sins no more” (Jeremiah 31:34).

Because their sins hadn’t been eradicated, even the deceased OT saints could not come into the presence of a God whose righteousness had not yet been satisfied by the Cross:

“And all these, though commended through their faith, did not receive what was promised, since God had provided something better for us, that apart from us they should not be made perfect.” (Hebrews 11:39-40)

Consequently, after Jesus proclaimed that “It is finished” and the veil of the Temple was torn in two, symbolizing the fact that the way into presence of God was now opened, there was a great earthquake to reinforce this lesson:

“And behold, the curtain of the temple was torn in two, from top to bottom. And the earth shook, and the rocks were split. The tombs also were opened. And many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised, and coming out of the tombs after his resurrection they went into the holy city and appeared to many.” (Matthew 27:51-53)

Presumably, after their appearances, those saints were enabled to ascend into God’s presence.

3). DECLARED RIGHTEOUS BY HIS BLOOD

Muslims must show us the contradiction in any of the following verses and explain why none of this is in the Quran. Nevertheless the Quran upholds ALL of the following by virtue of Surah 3:3 and others. Perhaps Allah made the need for blood atonement so clear, the Quran had no need to repeat it explicitly and Surah 3:3 is all the guidance a Muslim needs. In any event all that follows MUST hold true until and unless Muslims can prove that the Quran abrogated the doctrine of blood atonement or did away with it through a superior basis for redemption. And if they cannot, and I guarantee they won’t, Muslims still in doubt are admonished to ask us, the people of the book! (Surah 10:94)

  • The Blood Shed Atones: Relevant Verses (all quotes are from the HCSB – caps for emphasis)

“Once a year Aaron is to perform the purification rite on the horns of the altar. Throughout your generations he is to perform the purification rite for it once a year, WITH THE BLOOD OF THE SIN OFFERING FOR ATONEMENT. The altar is especially holy to the Lord.” (Exodus 30:10)

“The bull for the sin offering and the goat for the sin offering, whose BLOOD WAS BROUGHT INTO THE MOST HOLY PLACE TO MAKE ATONEMENT, must be brought outside the camp and their hide, flesh, and dung burned up.” (Leviticus 16:27)

“For the life of a creature is in the blood, and I have appointed it to you to make atonement on the altar for your lives, since it is the LIFEBLOOD THAT MAKES ATONEMENT.” (Leviticus 17:11)

“But He was PIERCED BECAUSE OF OUR TRANSGRESSIONS, crushed because of our iniquities; punishment for our peace was on Him, and WE ARE HEALED BY HIS WOUNDS. He will see it out of His anguish, and He will be satisfied with His knowledge. My righteous Servant WILL JUSTIFY MANY, AND HE WILL CARRY THEIR INIQUITIES. Therefore I will give Him the many as a portion, and He will receive the mighty as spoil, because He submitted Himself to death, and was counted among the rebels; YET HE BORE THE SINS OF MANY AND INTERCEDED FOR THE REBELS.” (Isaiah 53:5‭, ‬11‭-‬12)

“Then He took a cup, and after giving thanks, He gave it to them and said, “Drink from it, all of you. For this is My blood that establishes the covenant; IT IS SHED FOR MANY FOR THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS.” (Matthew 26:27‭-‬28)

“For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, AND TO GIVE HIS LIFE — A RANSOM FOR MANY.” (Mark 10:45)

“Then He took a cup, and after giving thanks, He gave it to them, and so they all drank from it. He said to them, “This is My blood that establishes the covenant; IT IS SHED FOR MANY.” (Mark 14:23‭-‬24)

“In the same way He also took the cup after supper and said, “This cup is the new covenant established by My blood; IT IS SHED FOR YOU.” (Luke 22:20)

“So Jesus said to them, “I assure you: Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you do not have life in yourselves. Anyone who eats My flesh and DRINKS MY BLOOD has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day, because My flesh is real food and My blood is real drink. The one who eats My flesh and drinks My blood lives in Me, and I in him. Just as the living Father sent Me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on Me will live because of Me. This is the bread that came down from heaven; it is not like the manna your fathers ate — and they died. The one who eats this bread will live forever.” (John 6:53‭-‬58)

“Be on guard for yourselves and for all the flock that the Holy Spirit has appointed you to as overseers, to shepherd the church of God, WHICH HE PURCHASED WITH HIS OWN BLOOD.” (Acts 20:28)

“They are justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. God presented Him as a propitiation THROUGH FAITH IN HIS BLOOD, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His restraint God passed over the sins previously committed.” (Romans 3:24‭-‬25)

“But God proves His own love for us in that while we were still sinners, CHRIST DIED FOR US! Much more then, since WE HAVE BEEN DECLARED RIGHTEOUS BY HIS BLOOD, we will be saved through Him from wrath.” (Romans 5:8‭-‬9)

“For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: On the night when He was betrayed, the Lord Jesus took bread, gave thanks, broke it, and said, “This is My body, which is for you. Do this in remembrance of Me.” In the same way, after supper He also took the cup and said, “THIS CUP IS THE NEW COVENANT ESTABLISHED BY MY BLOOD. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.” (1 Corinthians 11:23‭-‬25)

“And through Him to reconcile everything to Himself by making peace THROUGH THE BLOOD OF HIS CROSS — whether things on earth or things in heaven. Once you were alienated and hostile in your minds because of your evil actions. But now HE HAS RECONCILED YOU BY HIS PHYSICAL BODY THROUGH HIS DEATH, to present you holy, faultless, and blameless before Him.” (Colossians 1:20‭-‬22)

“We have redemption in Him THROUGH HIS BLOOD, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of His grace.” (Ephesians 1:7)

“He entered the most holy place once for all, not by the blood of goats and calves, but BY HIS OWN BLOOD, having obtained eternal redemption. … HOW MUCH MORE WILL THE BLOOD OF THE MESSIAH, WHO THROUGH THE ETERNAL SPIRIT OFFERED HIMSELF WITHOUT BLEMISH TO GOD, CLEANSE OUR CONSCIENCES from dead works to serve the living God? According to the law ALMOST EVERYTHING IS PURIFIED WITH BLOOD, AND WITHOUT THE SHEDDING OF BLOOD THERE IS NO FORGIVENESS.” (Hebrews 9:12‭, ‬14‭-‬14‭, ‬22)

“You did not delight in whole burnt offerings and sin offerings. Then I said, “See — it is written about Me in the volume of the scroll — I have come to do Your will, God! ” After He says above, You did not want or delight in sacrifices and offerings, whole burnt offerings and sin offerings (which are offered according to the law), He then says, See, I have come to do Your will. He takes away the first to establish the second. Therefore, brothers, since we have boldness to enter the sanctuary THROUGH THE BLOOD OF JESUS,” (Hebrews 10:6‭-‬9‭,‬19)

“Therefore Jesus also suffered outside the gate, so that He might SANCTIFY THE PEOPLE BY HIS OWN BLOOD.” (Hebrews 13:12)

“For you know that you were redeemed from your empty way of life inherited from the fathers, not with perishable things like silver or gold, but with the PRECIOUS BLOOD OF CHRIST, like that of a lamb without defect or blemish.” (1 Peter 1:18‭-‬19)

“But if we walk in the light as He Himself is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and THE BLOOD OF JESUS HIS SON CLEANSES US FROM ALL SIN. If we say, “We have no sin,” we are deceiving ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say, “We don’t have any sin,” we make Him a liar, and His word is not in us.” (1 John 1:7‭-‬10)

“and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead and the ruler of the kings of the earth. To Him who loves us and HAS SET US FREE FROM OUR SINS BY HIS BLOOD”, (Revelation 1:5)

“I said to him, “Sir, you know.” Then he told me: These are the ones coming out of the great tribulation. THEY WASHED THEIR ROBES AND MADE THEM WHITE IN THE BLOOD OF THE LAMB.” (Revelation 7:14)

“They conquered him by THE BLOOD OF THE LAMB and by the word of their testimony, for they did not love their lives in the face of death.” (Revelation 12:11)

4). CONCLUSIONS

This is what blood atonement alone achieves. It replaces our sinful nature with God’s righteousness. Blood atonement enables sinfulness—not sins—to be blotted out of the hearts, minds, and characters of God’s people. For as long as we remain in the flesh and retain our sinful nature, sins will still be committed – and need to be confessed (1 John 1:7-9).

Instead of our sinful nature, even though we remain liable to sin, God writes in His perfection. Even before we are made perfect, the blood of Jesus makes us perfect in God”s sight! Hallelujah! What an astonishing God! What grace is this? Not only did He not wait for us to confess our need for Him, Christ died for us; but even more amazingly, He does not wait for us to receive our resurrection bodies of eternal life, we are already treated as having them now, here on earth.

And because the records in heaven are the perfect record of each of our characters, the sinfulness that used to be in our characters, and thus in the records of heaven, is removed both from our characters and, subsequently, the record of our character in heaven. In other words, the only way to have sin removed from your record in heaven is to trust God, to open your heart to His Remedy (the Cross of Jesus), and to have sinfulness removed from your character here on earth. And the only thing that can achieve this for you and me is the shed blood of Jesus.

Isaiah saw God’s righteousness adorning him like a garment. Notice WHO is doing the clothing, it is from God not of ourselves:

I will greatly rejoice in the Lord , My soul shall be joyful in my God; For HE HAS CLOTHED ME WITH THE GARMENTS OF SALVATION, HE HAS COVERED ME WITH THE ROBE OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, As a bridegroom decks himself with ornaments, And as a bride adorns herself with her jewels. For as the earth brings forth its bud, As the garden causes the things that are sown in it to spring forth, So the Lord God WILL CAUSE RIGHTEOUSNESS AND PRAISE TO SPRING FORTH BEFORE ALL NATIONS.” (Isaiah 61:10‭-‬11 NKJV)

What enables us to wear the robe of righteousness? Only the blood of the Lamb.

“THEY WASHED THEIR ROBES AND MADE THEM WHITE IN THE BLOOD OF THE LAMB.” (Revelation 7:14)

Those who refuse to allow God into their hearts to remove sinfulness and write in His righteousness will, instead of having their sins blotted out of their hearts, and therefore their records, have themselves blotted out of existence; thus, they will be removed from the heavenly records. This is precisely what is meant by the Exodus 32 passage, “Whoever has sinned against me I will blot out of my book.”

So, don’t fall for the legal lie—which is the model of the Muslim idea that sins are merely bad deeds that can be blotted out and simply require erasure from record books or even more fancifully transformed into good deeds! Such heresy only instills within us the belief that sin is mostly a behavioral problem, rather than a heart problem; it also says God is the One we must fear, because He will punish us for any unconfessed sin, instead of fearing sin itself and what it will do to us if we don’t take the remedy that is found only in Christ’s shed blood and the healing power of the Cross.

Muslims and other unbelievers, embrace the truth that God wants to erase all sin, all defects, and all deviations from His design from you and restore you to His ideal! And He will do it, here and now this day on earth, if only you will trust Him! It’s all about what He has done through His Son to shed His blood and clothe us in His righteousness. Nothing else can get you that makeover making you fit for eternity. Amen.