All posts by David Stevenson

All prophets have to be from the line Isaac and Jacob

Since the time of these mighty patriarchs, all of the chosen people of the Lord have come through their lineage or have been adopted into their lineage. In the Old Testament, Jehovah is repeatedly called the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

Jacob, in Genesis, identifies Yahweh as the God of his fathers Abraham and Isaac. Secondly, the Bible rejects the claim that God gave Ishmael revelation and prophethood since it expressly says that Ishmael was not included in God’s covenant blessings that were given solely to Isaac, Jacob and his children.

And God said, Sarah your wife shall bear you a son indeed; and you shall call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him.
But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto you at this set time in the next year. Gen. 17:19, 21

In the Abrahamic Covenant, the Lord repeated the covenant promise to three generations, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. All three were promised land, many descendants, and a blessing from the Lord. Abraham was called out of Ur of the Chaldees to Canaan, and the Lord established a covenant with Him (Genesis 12:1-3). The Lord reaffirmed the same covenant He made with Abraham’s son, Isaac (Genesis 21:12; 26:3-4). Later, the covenant was affirmed with Isaac’s son, Jacob (Genesis 28:14-15).

Does the Bible Really Claim that Insects Only have Four Legs?

11 And the Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron, saying to them, 2 “Speak to the people of Israel, saying, These are the living things that you may eat among all the animals that are on the earth. 3 Whatever parts the hoof and is cloven-footed and chews the cud, among the animals, you may eat. 4 Nevertheless, among those that chew the cud or part the hoof, you shall not eat these: The camel, because it chews the cud but does not part the hoof, is unclean to you. 5 And the rock badger, because it chews the cud but does not part the hoof, is unclean to you. 6 And the hare, because it chews the cud but does not part the hoof, is unclean to you. 7 And the pig, because it parts the hoof and is cloven-footed but does not chew the cud, is unclean to you. 8 You shall not eat any of their flesh, and you shall not touch their carcasses; they are unclean to you.

9 “These you may eat, of all that are in the waters. Everything in the waters that has fins and scales, whether in the seas or in the rivers, you may eat. 10 But anything in the seas or the rivers that does not have fins and scales, of the swarming creatures in the waters and of the living creatures that are in the waters, is detestable to you. 11 You shall regard them as detestable; you shall not eat any of their flesh, and you shall detest their carcasses. 12 Everything in the waters that does not have fins and scales is detestable to you.

13 “And these you shall detest among the birds;[a] they shall not be eaten; they are detestable: the eagle,[b] the bearded vulture, the black vulture, 14 the kite, the falcon of any kind, 15 every raven of any kind, 16 the ostrich, the nighthawk, the sea gull, the hawk of any kind, 17 the little owl, the cormorant, the short-eared owl, 18 the barn owl, the tawny owl, the carrion vulture, 19 the stork, the heron of any kind, the hoopoe, and the bat.

20 “All winged insects that go on all fours are detestable to you. 21 Yet among the winged insects that go on all fours you may eat those that have jointed legs above their feet, with which to hop on the ground. 22 Of them you may eat: the locust of any kind, the bald locust of any kind, the cricket of any kind, and the grasshopper of any kind. 23 But all other winged insects that have four feet are detestable to you

First, we must recognize that modern day taxonomic categories, like species, genus, family, etc., are not the same as the Biblical “kind.” Even the term “creeping thing” finds wide application meaning, in general, small animals which exist in great numbers. In this chapter it is used for insects (v. 21), various small mammals and reptiles (vv. 29,30), as well as animals which “move” in the ocean (v. 10).

Likewise the term “flying” applies both to flying insects and birds (vv. 13-19). Obviously, the context and description must take precedence in identification, and in this case, the “four legged insect” applies, in particular, to the grasshopper/locust kind.

In our modern classification system, all insects have at least six legs. They are members of the large and varied arthropod phyla, which includes also the eight-legged spiders, the multi-legged centipedes, as well as crabs—anything with segmented legs. Some insects also have wings, but these don’t count as legs.

Today, locusts are considered migratory grasshoppers. They all have two large hind legs, quite different in appearance, size, and function from the front four legs. Their front legs are used for “crawling, clinging, and climbing,” while their back legs rest “above” their front legs and feet, and are used for “jumping.” Furthermore, the Hebrew word translated “beetle” actually comes from the verb “to leap,” implying a similar leaping insect, not our modern beetle. Thus, the Biblical description of grasshoppers turns out to be exactly anatomically correct. Far from being an embarrassment to Bible believers, this passage bears sterling testimony to the accuracy and inspiration of Scripture. As always, arguments which claim that the Bible is wrong are themselves wrong, and the Bible still stands!

In verse 13 Moses tells us about the birds, and then he lists them out. In verse 19 we see the bat is included in this list. We know that a bat is not a bird. Does this not mean that the Bible is incorrect?

The Bible is not meant to be a scientific description of modern biological categories. Instead, it is often written from the perspective of what we see. In other words, it makes generic categorizations. In this case, the bat is categorized as a bird because like birds, it flies and is similar in size to most birds. If we did not know that it was a mammal, it would be natural to call it a bird. To the Hebrew of ancient times, calling it a bird was perfectly logical. But, in modern times we categorize animal species more specifically and have categorized the bat as a mammal and not a bird.

Also, we must be aware that it is modern science that has a different classification system than ancient times. To the ancients, creatures such as a bat were considered birds since they categorized all flying animals as birds. If that is the category that they used, then they were correct. It is not an error. It is a difference of categorization procedures. The critic has imposed upon the ancient text a modern system of categorization and then said that the Bible is wrong. This is a big error in thinking.

Leviticus 11:20 “FOWLS that creep, going upon all four”

Is the King James Bible “a bad translation” in Leviticus 11:19-20?

“FOWLS” or “flying insects”?  Bats as birds?

At one internet forum an atheist was mocking the Bible and particularly the King James Bible for how it is translated in Leviticus 11:20.  

The Bible mocker posts – Christians can you explain the “four legged fowls” in Leviticus 11:20?  Really. God doesn’t know that birds don’t have four legs? He couldn’t make sure “his” word knew a basic fact like that. Please explain.”  

Many other Bible scoffers mock the Bible for calling bats “fowls” in Leviticus 11:19 where the bat is listed “among the fowls” (11:13) – “And the stork, the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, AND THE BAT.”

Then a professing Christian named Mike answers: “they are talking about insects, the KJV isn’t a good translation “Every swarming, winged insect that walks across the ground like a four-legged animal is disgusting to you.”

And then another Christian posts: “That is probably the KJV. Known to be not so good on translating some of the Old Testament. The scholars they had weren’t as good with Hebrew.” [End of selected quotes]

Contrary to popular belief, even among most Christians today, the King James Bible is NOT in error here or anywhere else.  We simply need to look at the context of Leviticus 11, the kinds of animals mentioned in the lists, and the meaning of both the Hebrew word “gohph” and the English word “fowls”.

The Hebrew word in question is # 5775 gohph. It is found about 70 times in the Hebrew text and in the King James Bible it is always translated either as “fowl” or fowls (56 times) or “birds” (9 times) or “flying” or “flieth” (3 times).

You should also note the very common phrases found in the Bible that often distinguish  between “every FOWL OF THE AIR” (Genesis 1:26, 28, 30; Genesis 2:19, 20 etc.) and “the FOWLS OF THE HEAVEN” (Psalm 104:12; Ezekiel 29:5 etc.)  and “FOWLS THAT MAY FLY ABOVE THE EARTH” (Genesis 1:20 First mention)  versus “FOWLS THAT CREEP going upon all four” (Leviticus 11:20) and “EVERY CREEPING THING THAT FLIETH”.

Some of these animals that God calls “FOWLS” (they are ALL the exact same Hebrew word) are the birds that fly in the heaven or the air above the earth, and others are “FOWLS that creep” on the earth and have wings with which they can fly LIKE THE BAT.

God’s classification of what He calls “FOWLS” are ANIMALS THAT HAVE WINGS AND CAN FLY.

God’s classification of the animals HE created in the first place, is not that of man’s. God’s system of classification is divided into four different kinds of flesh.  

“All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of MEN, another flesh of BEASTS, another of FISHES, and another of BIRDS.”  1 Corinthians 15:39  

If you don’t happen to like it, or you disagree, then take it up with God when you see him and find out what He thinks of your opinions.  And you WILL see Him some day. Guaranteed.

The English word FOWL. What does it mean?

Webster’s English Dictionary 1828 Fowl – noun, Latin fugio, fugo.  Greek. and signifying the flying animal.  

The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia says of “Fowls” – FOWL – foul (`oph; peteinon): The word is now generally restricted to the larger, especially the edible birds, but formerly IT DENOTED ALL FLYING CREATURES; in Leviticus 11:20 the King James Version we have even, “all fowls that creep, going upon all four,” 11:21, “every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four.”

The Etymology Dictionary tells us the origin of this word is “Old Norse fugal, German vogel, Gothic fugls, probably by dissimilation from *flug-la, literally “flyer”, from the same root as Old English fleogan, modern “to fly”. 

Notice the next verse in Leviticus 11:21 that follows the mention of the “fowls that creep, going upon all four” – “Yet these may ye eat of every FLYING (same Hebrew word) creeping thing that goeth upon all four, which have LEGS ABOVE THEIR FEET, TO LEAP WITHAL UPON THE EARTH.”

The “fowls” mentioned in the context here (if it flies, it is called “fowl”) have four legs with which they creep and two legs that serve the purpose of allowing them to launch themselves into flight with their wings.  These would include such things as grasshoppers, locusts, and beetles capable of short flight.  

In this chapter of Leviticus 11, the word # 5775 gohph occurs 5 times in the Hebrew text. 

The King James Bible translates it as “the FOWLS” (v.13), “the FOWLS that creep” (20), “every FLYING creeping thing” (21), “all other FLYING creeping thing” (23) and “This is the law of the beasts, and of THE FOWL, and of every living creature that moveth in the waters, and of every creature that creepth upon the earth.” (46)

The NKJV and NIV have these as “the birds” (v.13), “FLYING INSECTS that creep” (v. 20), “flying insects” (v.21), “flying insects” (23) and “THE BIRDS” (v.46)

The ESV  and NASB have “the bird” (13 and 46) and as “the winged insects” (v. 20, 21, 23).  Yet they are all the exact same Hebrew words.

God’s method of classification is not the same as that of the man made system of classification. The modern “scientific” method established by Carl Linnaeus in his book Systema Naturae in 1735 is not the same as the way God does it.  

In God’s list in the Hebrew language, He includes among this list (found in all Bibles) the BATS among the “fowls” or “birds”. By the Linnaean method, bats are considered to be mammals and not “fowls”. Yet they fly with wings and have the general appearance of other birds. 

 So if you are going to claim that the King James Bible is wrong for referring to certain “insects” that are capable of flight with their wings as “fowls”, then you also have to consider the modern versions as being in error for including the bats among the “birds” in Leviticus 11:19! 

By the way, there IS a modern Hebrew word for “insects”, but it is not found in the Hebrew Masoretic text and it is an entirely different word from the one God uses in Leviticus to classify the locust and grasshoppers among the “fowls”. 

The modern Hebrew word for “insects” is khah-rah-keem, and it is an entirely different word than the word found in all Hebrew texts for “fowls” and “birds”, which is gohph.  

So it turns out that it is the modern versions that are introducing man’s thoughts and reasonings into God’s words, rather than the King James Bible being “a bad translation.”  

“Archaic” and inerrant beats “modern” but perverted any day.  See “The Old Fashioned Language of the King James Bible” for many more examples.    http://brandplucked.webs.com/archaickjbship.htm

Other Bibles that also say “FOWLS that creep, going upon all four” 

Not only does the King James Bible say “All FOWLS THAT CREEP, going upon all four” in Leviticus 11:20 but so do the following Bible translations: Wycliffe 1395 – “Al thing of FOULIS that goith on foure feet, schal be abhomynable to you”,  Tyndale 1524,  Coverdale 1535, the Great Bible 1540, Matthew’s Bible 1549,  the Bishops’ Bible 1568 – “Let all FOULES that creepe and go vpon all foure, be an abhomination vnto you.”, the Geneva Bible 1587 – “Also euery FOULE that creepeth & goeth vpon all foure, such shalbe an abomination vnto you.”, The Bill Bible 1671, Daniel Webster’s 1833 translation – “All FOWLS that creep, going upon all four, shall be an abomination to you.”, The Boothroyd Bible 1853, The Jewish Family Bible 1864, The Ancient Hebrew Bible 1907, the 1936 Hebrew Publishing Company Translation “All FOWLS that creep, going upon all four, shall be an abomination unto you.”, The Word of Yah Bible 1993, the KJV 21st Century Version 1994, the Third Millennium Bible 1998 `All FOWLS THAT CREEP, going upon all fours, shall be an abomination unto you.”, God’s First Truth Translation 1999, The Revised Geneva Bible 2005, The Hebrew Transliteration Scripture 2010, The Bond Slave Version 2012 and the 2011 Orthodox Jewish Bible – “All FOWLS THAT CREEP, going upon all fours, shall be sheketz unto you.” 

The Jewish Family Bible 1864 – “all FOWL GOING UPON ALL FOUR”  – 

https://archive.org/stream/jewishschoolfami01beni#page/n203

The Ancient Hebrew Bible 1907 – “all FOWLS THAT CREEP, GOING UPON ALL FOUR” –

https://archive.org/stream/jewishschoolfami01beni#page/n203

The Hebrew Transliteration Bible 2010 – “all FOWLS THAT CREEP, GOING UPON ALL FOUR” –

https://www.messianic-torah-truth-seeker.org/Scriptures/Tenakh/Vayikra/Vayikra11.htm

And this online Hebrew Interlinear bible –

http://studybible.info/IHOT/Leviticus%2011:20

Adam Clarke Commentary – “All fowls that creep – Such as the bat, already mentioned, which has claws attached to its leathern wings, and which serve in place of feet to crawl by, the feet and legs not being distinct; but this may also include all the different kinds of insects, with the exceptions in the following verse.” 

Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament – “To the birds there are appended flying animals of other kinds: “all swarms of FOWL THAT GO UPON FOURS “(Caps are mine)  i.e., the smaller winged animals with four feet.These were not to be eaten, as they were all abominations, with the exception of those “which have two shank-feet above their feet (i.e., springing feet) to leap with” . Locusts are the animals referred to, four varieties being mentioned with their different species (“after his kind”).” 

Jamieson, Fausset and Brown on Lev. 11:20 – “All FOWLS that creep, etc. — BY “FOWLS” HERE ARE TO BE UNDERSTOOD ALL CREATURES WITH WINGS and “going upon all fours,” not a restriction to animals which have exactly four feet, because many “creeping things” have more than that number.”

From the Internet – Objection raised and Answered.From a guy who is really hostile toward the King James Bible and who tells us that NO translation is the inerrant words of God and calls us King James Bible believers “stupid” and “fools”.
Our resident scholar and deep thinker, Genius George, posts: “LEVITICUS 11:21-22 (KJV):Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four, WHICH HAVE LEGS ABOVE THEIR FEET, to leap withal upon the earth; Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, AND THE BEETLE AFTER HIS KIND, and the grasshopper after his kind.
So, you, in order to protect the King Jimmy, you go back to Leviticus 11:20, saying the beetle is a “fowl” WHICH ITSELF IS AN ERROR!
LEVITICUS 11:20 (KJV):All fowls that creep, going upon all four, shall be an abomination unto you.
THERE ARE NO FOUR FOOTED BIRDS! You just pointed out another error of the KJV! ” (End of Bible critic’s comments)
My Response:
Uh….George. You DID read the article, right? I never said nor does the King James Bible nor even the Hebrew text say that a beetle is a BIRD, nor do they say there are four footed BIRDS.
You will NOT find the word BIRD in those verses either in the King James Bible nor in the Hebrew text.
The Hebrew word for BIRD is #6833 צפור (tzip-pohr)
And the Hebrew word for FOWL is # 5775 העוף (gohph)
In fact, both words are used in the first verse where both “fowl” and “bird” occur in the Bible.
In Genesis 7:14-15 we read of all the animals that went into the ark Noah built – “They, and every beast after his kind, and all the cattle after their kind, and every creeping thing that creeps on the earth after his kind, and every FOWL after his kind, every BIRD of every sort. 15 And they went in to Noah into the ark, two and two of all flesh, wherein is the breath of life.”
If you actually had any reading comprehension skills you should have seen that both the English dictionaries and God’s use of the Hebrew language define a FOWL as anything that has wings and flies, whereas a BIRD is a specific kind of flying FOWL. Get it?
No, probably not. You might want to go back and READ the article again, sir. And ask God to humble your pride and give you understanding.

The King James Bible is always right. Accept no inferior substitute.

All of grace, believing the Book

Source https://brandplucked.webs.com/lev1120fowlscreep.htm

32 Reasons why the Gospel Of Barnabas is a 16th Century Forgery written by Muslims.

The Koran teaches that someone who looked like Jesus was crucified on the cross in a case of mistaken identity. Many Muslims appeal to the Gospel of Barnabas as proof that the unknown look alike was Judas Iscariot.

  • “they did not slay him, neither crucified him, only a likeness of that was shown to them” (Qur’an 4:156)
  • “Verily I say that the voice, the face, and the person of Judas were so like to Jesus, that his disciples and believers entirely believed that be was Jesus” (Gospel of Barnabas)

Historical discovery of the Gospel of Barnabas in 1709 AD:

  1. The “Gospel of Barnabas” (G.o.B.) first appeared in Holland in 1709. This manuscript was written in Italian and supplied with footnotes in poor Arabic. The sources of the “Gospel” are unknown. This document is now preserved in the Imperial Museum in Vienna.
  2. George Sale translated the Qur’an from Arabic into English in 1734. In his preface, he mentions another copy of the same “Gospel” in Spanish. This document is lost and all we know about it is what Sale wrote down. It says in a statement on the title page that it was a translation from the Italian by a Spanish Muslim named Mostafa de Aranda (Aranda is a town in Spain). It further mentions that the Italian text had been stolen by a monk, Fra Marino, from the papal library, while Pope Sixtus V was having a little nap. After reading it Fra Marino became a Muslim. Since that time, Muslims have claimed that the “Gospel of Barnabas” is an authentic Gospel, perhaps even the “original” one. In 1907 the G.o.B. was translated into English by Laura and Lonsdale Ragg. In the introduction, they provide internal and external evidence to the effect that the G.o.B. was a Medieval forgery.
  3. Since then Arabic and Urdu translations have been produced, all, however, without the introduction by the Raggs. Lt.-Col. M.A. Rahim (Pakistan) reprinted the G.o.B. in English in 1973, again omitting the introduction, but substituting another one written from the Islamic point of view.
  4. The Gospel of Barnabas has been extensively used by Muslims to demonstrate that the Bible has been corrupted, when measured against a Gospel that was hidden away for nearly two millennia. Needless to say, the G.o.B. largely confirms the teaching of Islam concerning Jesus.
  5. To believe that the Gospel of Barnabas is anything other than a 16th century fraud is an assault on common sense.

The content of the Gospel of Barnabas:

  1. Above all, the entire G.o.B. endeavours to show the superiority of Muhammad over Jesus.
  2. Of the G.o.B. presents another Gospel narrative, i.e. another record of the life and ministry of Christ. On most doctrinal points it differs widely from the accepted Gospel account and in such a way that the Islamic version of Jesus is emphasized.
  3. Jesus Christ is neither the Son of God, nor divine. He is rather: “the voice crying in the wilderness” to prepare the way for the coming Messiah, Muhammad. In the G.o.B. Christ is not the Messiah, but assumes instead a role similar to that of John the Baptist in our Gospel account. John the Baptist is not mentioned in the G.o.B. Consequently, the emphasis in the G.o.B. is on the coming of Muhammad, the saviour of the world (Chapter 96b and 97b, etc.). As might be expected, Christ was not crucified (in agreement with Sura 4:156), but instead Judas was killed in His place. During the period of His supposed arrest, Christ was hiding in a house in the garden of Gethsemane from where He was taken out by four (!) archangels (a much later tradition or legend) through the window and ascended into the third of seven heavens.

32 reasons why the Gospel of Barnabas is a forgery written in 1585 AD:

Click to View“Internal Evidence is supplied by the content of the book itself. Any writing is sure to bear the mark of a particular age. The style, language and subject matter of the book will betray it.” (Gairdner, page 9).

Click to View“If someone brought you a film which he claimed to have been made in 1905 and started to screen it and it looked every bit like an old film, with old clothes and fashions, you might believe him. If, however, in the middle of a scene … you saw a Concorde going across the sky, you would say … ‘This film is a fabrication.'” (John Gilchrist). A. Irrefutable proof the Gospel of Barnabas was written around 1585 AD:

  1. Most suspicious of course, is any mentioning of the name of Muhammad. (In Chapters 44, 54, 112, 97 and 163, etc.) It is particularly suspicious, since all the other evidence points to the fact that the whole of the G.o.B is a Medieval forgery. But other Islamic thought is also reflected in the G.o.B.
  2. In Chapter 54, the Italian text mentions a denarius, which is made up of 60 minuti. These gold coins were used only in Spain under Khalif Abdul Malik (in 685 A.D.).
  3. The Italian poet Dante lived about the time of the composition of the G.o.B. (1265-1321) and it is interesting to notice a number of quotations from Dante’s works in the G.o.B. There are many and they can hardly be regarded as coincidences. The G.o.B. quotes Jesus as saying to Peter: “Know ye therefore, that hell is one, yet hath seven centres one below another. Hence, even as sin is of seven kinds, for as seven gates of hell has Satan generated it: So are seven punishments therein.” (Chapter 135a). This is exactly what Dante says in Cantos V, VI, etc. of his “Inferno”. Again “Barnabas” says that God, having created the human senses, condemned them “to hell and to intolerable snow and ice” (Chapter 106, which corresponds with Cantos XXVIII and III of the “Inferno”). The description of human sins and their returning at the end like a river to Satan, who is their source, is another indirect quotation from Dante’s description of the rivers of hell. Similarly, the passages about the believers going to hell, not to be tortured, but to see the unbelievers in their torments, recalls to mind Dante’s picture of the same. The differentiation between degrees of glory, and the absence of all feuds and jealousies in heaven, are taken entirely from Dante’s “Paradise”, Canto III. But still stronger evidence that “Barnabas” quotes directly or indirectly from Dante is his description of the “Geography of Heaven”. There “Barnabas” agrees with Dante and contradicts even the Qur’an itself. The Qur’an (Sura 2:29) says that the heavens are seven in number, while “Barnabas” gives the number as nine (Chapter 178a) (Gairdner, pages 19-21). These few indications are sufficient evidence that the writer of the G.o.B. must have been acquainted with the writings of Dante and consequently must have I lived after Dante, or else been a contemporary of his.
  4. First we should like to observe that all quotations in the G.o.B. from Old and New Testament are taken from the Vulgate translation. (Approximately 380 A.D.) This Latin Bible has been used in the Catholic Church ever since. The above is an example of an anachronism because the G.o.B. is supposed to date from before the Vulgate was written.
  5. In Chapters 91-92 we are told that Jesus and His disciples kept “the 40 days”. The context clearly shows that this refers to the period of Lent before Easter, celebrated by the church, but from a very much later period than the days of the early church. (The church meditates at this time on the suffering of Christ, which was obviously unknown when Christ was still alive). We find that Lent was celebrated only from the fourth century A.D. onwards. Jesus and His disciples are said to have gone for the 40 day fast to Mount Sinai. which is some 450 km away. There is no report in the New Testament to confirm this.
  6. In Chapter 3 of the G.o.B. the birth of Christ is described as having been painless. This belief was not current in the Church before Thomas Aquinas (died 1278) but is mentioned in Sura 19:23
  7. Not before the Fourth Century A.D. was the title “Virgin” given to Mary, yet it appears in the G.o.B.
  8. Origen A.D. 184-254 was the first scholar to assume that Mount Tabor was the Mount of Transfiguration. The Bible does not confirm this. The Christian tradition that it was Mount Moriah begins only in the Third Century, and yet the G.o.B. contains this information.
  9. The G.o.B. mentions four archangels, which is also a tradition of the church that dated from the early Medieval period.
  10. In Chapter 82 mention is made of the “Years of the Jubilee, which now cometh every 100 years.” The Year of Jubilee, according to the Old Testament, was every 50th year (after seven times seven years). The origin of this faulty information is as follows: In the year A.D. 1300 Pope Boniface the VIII instituted the Jubilee as a centenary event. Owing to its financial success, however, Pope Clement VI reversed Boniface’s decision and celebrated the next Jubilee in 1350. This was thus the only time that the Year of Jubilee was intended as a centenary occasion – it never was in practice. (Gairdner, page 19).
  11. Eve is said to have eaten an “apple” in Paradise (Chapters 40 and 41). We are well aware that Eve ate an unspecified fruit, but the belief that this was an apple dates from a very much later date.
  12. Another proof of the G.o.B. being Medieval in origin, is that we have a report (Chapter 99) of a duel between two rival lovers. This type of chivalry was a creation of Medieval society (Gairdner, page 24).
  13. In Chapter 39 Adam sees bright writing and the content is none other than the Kalimah. There is only one God” and “Muhammad is the Messenger of God.” (The Kalimah is an Arabic word which has found its way to other languages of Muslim people. It refers to the declaration which brings a person into the fold of Islam. Anyone who wishes to be a Muslim must declare that he believes in the Oneness of Allah and in the Prophet as Allah’s messenger.)
  14. The surprised reader of the G.o.B. finds Nazareth on the shore of Lake Galilee (Chapter 20), whereas it is a town miles away from the Lake, surrounded by mountains.
  15. In the next chapter, we see Jesus going UP to Capernaum, whereas Capernaum is situated right on the shore of the Lake.
  16. In Chapter 151 we are told that Jesus embarked on a ship (from Nazareth?) and next we read that he arrived in Jerusalem. We might well ask whether this was also done by boat?
  17. We are further informed that a certain dispute would have ended in war, but the Romans assembled three armies each numbering 200,000 men at Mizpeh (Chapter 91). The entire Roman army at that time numbered only 300,000, however. (Encyclopedia Britannica).
  18. According to the G.o.B. Jesus was born when Pilate was governor, but in fact he only became governor between A.D. 26 and 27.
  19. In Chapter 145 of the G.o.B. Pharisees date back as far as the time of Elijah and there were supposed to have been 17,000. In fact, history first knows about Pharisees seven centuries later, in the period between 135-104 B.C.
  20. We find it highly suspicious and wrong to read that the Torah was written by an Ismaelite (Chapter 192).
  21. In Chapter 152 we are informed that soldiers were “rolled out of the temple as one rolleth casks of wood when they are washed to refill them with wine.” Wooden barrels were invented 2000 years ago in Gaul but were not used in the East in New Testament times. Wine and other liquids were stored in skins.
  22. In Chapter 6 another interesting common error is found. It speaks here of the three Magi or wise men coming from the East. The New Testament does not specify the number, but gives a list of three gifts that were brought by the Magi, namely gold, myrrh and frankincense. This later led to the assumption that there were three wise men from the East. But this belief certainly does not derive or date from the New Testament.
  23. In the G.o.B. (Chapter 1) “Barnabas” is called an Apostle. This is not correct in its implication. Although Barnabas is referred to as an Apostle (Acts 14:4,14), the G.o.B. concept is quite different. The conversion of Barnabas took place after the Day of Pentecost and consequently he does not qualify for apostleship as outlined in Acts 1:21-22 (and bearing in mind I Corinthians 15:8, 9:1-2, 1:1, Romans 1:1 etc.).
  24. “Jesus drew near to the Priest (High Priest) with reverence, but he was wishful to bow himself down and worship Jesus, when Jesus cried out: ‘Beware of that which thou doest, Priest of the Living God! Sin not against our God!” (Chapter 93). Jesus accepted worship many times in scripture because He is the creator.
  25. In “the true book of Moses … (it) is written that Ishmael is the father of Messiah, and Isaac the father of the messenger of the Messiah” (Chapter 191).
  26. In Chapter 222, the last chapter of the G.o.B., we read: “After Jesus had departed (after having been raised from his hiding place through the window of the house in the Garden of Gethsemane) the disciples scattered through the different parts of Israel and of the world, and the truth, hated of Satan, was persecuted, as it always is, by falsehood. For certain evil men, pretending to be disciples, preached that Jesus died and rose not again. Others preached that he really died, but rose again. Others preached and yet preach that Jesus is the Son of God, among whom is Paul deceived.” The G.o.B. herewith endeavours to correct preceding Gospels and Paul. We wish to ask the question when and how was the writer aware that the disciples had scattered throughout the different parts of the world? This question is left open, but easily answered by us, for we believe that it is yet another anachronism.
  27. In Chapter 97 Muhammad is clearly called the Messiah. The Qur’an, as well as the Bible confers this title on Jesus. It is somehow strange to realize that in the introduction of the G.o.B. Jesus is called Christ and in Chapters 42 and 82 “Barnabas” denies that Jesus is the Messiah. Only a theologically very ignorant person could have made such statements, because “Christos” is the Greek word for the Hebrew “Messiah”.
  28. In Chapter 80 of the G.o.B. we find a story about Daniel, which has it that he was taken captive by Nebuchadnezzar while he was yet two years old. This statement, it will be observed, is incompatible with what may be inferred from the Bible narrative. According to the latter, it was in the second year of his reign that Nebuchadnezzar had his famous dream, which Daniel interpreted. “Then the King gave Daniel high honours and many great gifts, and made him ruler over the whole province of Babylon, and chief prefect over the all-wise men of Babylon.” (Daniel 2:48). Now if we suppose that Nebuchadnezzar captured Daniel in the first year of his reign (the earliest possible date, which could be assigned to Daniel’s captivity) and that, according to “Barnabas”, Daniel was then two years old, it would follow then that in the second year of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign, Daniel was only three years old (Gairdner, page 26). Daniel was in fact born in 621 B.C. and the captivity began in 605 B.C., so he was 16 years old when taken prisoner.
  29. Jesus prayed five times a day according to the G.o.B. and all the Muslim prayer times are mentioned. (Drs. J. Slomp, page 128).
  30. The Islamic concept of “the Book” is found in Chapter 10, where we read that the angel Gabriel presented to Jesus as it were a shining mirror, a book, which descended into the heart of Jesus. This corresponds very well with Suras 5:49 and 2:97.
  31. We read that Ishmael was offered on the altar by Abraham (Chapter 44). This is clearly an Islamic concept.
  32. God is said to be the God of Abraham, ISHMAEL and Isaac in Chapter 212. It should read, according to the O.T. the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob.

Bibliography:

  1. “The Gospel of Barnabas” edited and translated by Lonsdale and Laura Ragg (1907), published by Begum Aisha Bawany Wakf Bank House No. 1 Habib Square M.A. Sinnah Road Karachi – Pakistan
  2. “The Gospel of Barnabas, an Essay and Inquiry” by Selim ‘Abdul-Ahad and W.H.T. Gairdner. (1975)
  3. Publishers: “Henry Martyn Institute of Islamic Studies”. P.O. Box 153, Hyderabad, India.
  4. “Pseudo-Barnabas in the context of Muslim-Christian Apologetics” by Dr. Jan Slomp. (1974) Published by: “Christian Study Centre” 126-B Murree Road, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  5. A paper by J.N.J. Kritzinger entitled “The Gospel of Barnabas Carefully Examined”
  6. “Origins and Sources of the Gospel of Barnabas” by John Gilchrist
  7. “Missing Documents from the Gospel of Barnabas” by Adam Peerbhai

The Forgery of the Gospel of Barnabas

Imagine someone claimed to find a new sura in the Muslim Qur’an. However, the earliest copy was not in Arabic, nor in a language of the Bible, but in Italian in the Middle Ages. Imagine there were things in the sura that contradicted what was in the rest of the Qur’an, as well as the Bible. Imagine that it also contained historical errors, and implied that people in Mohammed’s time lived the same way Europeans lived during the Middle Ages.

You might have some questions, to say the least! What is the evidence (if any) of authenticity and chain of transmission, why should it not be rejected, just as other historically late fanciful hadiths and other alleged writings of Mohammed are rejected?

The rest of this paper gives the precise reasons why all orthodox Muslims and Christians should agree that the Gospel of Barnabas is a Medieval forgery.

Basic Background

The Gospel of Barnabas is known only in Italian, and no ancient writer ever referred to it. It mentions things that were not used until centuries later. Furthermore, other gospel forgeries written in Arabic were also found in Granada. They were discovered after 1588, and the forgers were Moors. Though one Muslim writer, Ata ur-Raham, has confused this with another writing called the Letter/Epistle of Barnabas, there is no similarity except for the name.

Contradicting both the Bible and Qur’an

Jesus is not the Messiah. ch.83 p.181 ch.97 p.223 ch.42 p.97 (Jesus is called the Messiah/Christ in Suras 5:75; 5:17 (2x), 3:45; 4:157, 171, 172, 9:30)
The Messiah is Mohammed. ch.97 p.225-227
A prophet’s words are only to the people they were sent to. ch.43 p.101 (Sura 4:150-151 says not to separate between messengers)
Ishmael was the ancestor of the Messiah. ch.190 p.425; ch.191 p.407; ch.208 p.459; ch.43 p.103
God created all things for Messiah. ch.191 p.427
God created everything for Mohammed ch.39 p.91 “[Mohammed] shall be my messenger, for whom I have created all things; who shall give light to the world when he shall come; whose soul was set in a celestial splendour sixty thousand years before I made anything.”
“The messenger of God [Mohammed] shall answer: ‘O Lord, I remember that when thou didst create me, thou saidst that thou hadst willed to make for love of me the world and paradise, and angels and men, that they might glorify thee by me thy servant.”ch.55 p.131. Also ch.56. p.133
Without faith in Mohammed, none will be saved. (Most Muslims do not believe you should have saving faith in Mohammed.) ch.192 p.429

Some Other Differences with the Bible

Jesus is a voice in the wilderness. ch.42 p.97
Angels “rolled” the soldiers away for Jesus. ch.153 p.355
Mohammed is coming. Ch.44 p.105

Some Other Differences with the Qur’an

These contradictions with the Qur’an or unusual teachings not present in the Qur’an also might make Muslims wary of appealing to this “Gospel”.

Faithful Muslims who do not have works will be in Hell for 70,000 years. ch.137 p.319
Mohammed will go to Hell and be terrified as he beholds the punishment of others. ch.135 p.315
Mary gave birth to Jesus without pain. ch.3 p.9
Unlawful to hate anything except sin. ch.86 p.199
God is a father. ch.133 p.307
God is our Father. (-no sons, though) ch.17 p.31,33
There shall be no envy in Heaven ch.177 p.401
Jesus would sleep in like manner [die] and be speedily awakened. Ch.193 ‘Weep not, for Lazarus sleeps, and I am come to awake him.’ The Pharisees said among themselves: ‘Would to God that you did so sleep!’ Then Jesus said: ‘My hour is not yet come; but when it shall come I shall sleep in like manner, and shall be speedily awakened.’ Then Jesus said again: ‘Take away the stone from the sepulchre.’ Said Martha: ‘Lord, he stinks, for he has been dead four days. ‘Jesus said: ‘Why then am I come hither, Martha? Believe you not in me that I shall awaken him?’

General Errors – Sailing to Inland Cities

These mistakes demonstrate the author knew very little about the geography and history of Palestine.

Jesus went to the Sea of Galilee, and having embarked in a ship sailed to his city of Nazareth. ch.20 p.41 (Nazareth is inland.)
Romans said the idols were almighty. ch.152 p.353
Canaanites despised Pharisees. ch.144 p.335
Pharisees in Jesus’ time were very strange in their ascetism. ch.145 p.337-339
Funny things about Pharisees. ch.143 p.343-345
Rome has 28,000 gods. ch.152 p.353
Roman Senate decreed that none should call Jesus God of Son of God. ch.98 p.227, or speak of Jesus ch.157 p.367
Roman Senate’s decree. ch.210 p.461
People who preached penitence were called Nazarenes (after Jesus). ch.194 p.433
Judas smiled when the disciples mistook him for Jesus. ch.216 p.471
Israel says Jesus was God or the Son of God. ch.138 p.321
Barnabas was one of the disciples of Jesus. ch.83 p.191, ch.88 p.205, ch.19 p.39, ch.72 p.167
There was a great famine in Israel in Jesus’ time. ch.138 p.321
God gave Jesus bad consequences because others called Jesus God. ch.112 p.257
The mountains (plural) of Samaria. ch.81 p.189

Historical Anachronisms

Historical problems mention European things of the Middle Ages, which are out of place in Jesus’ time.

Coins in chapter 54 (golden denarius divided into sixty minuti) were Spanish.
Abraham’s father claimed there were an infinite number of gods. (The Sumerians did not have the concept of infinity) ch.26 p.57
“Whereupon, as the food was going down [Adam’s throat], he remembered the words of God; wherefore, wishing to stop the food, he put his hand into this throat, where every man has the mark.” (“Adam’s apple” was first a Medieval European phrase) ch.40 p.93
Pilate was governor when Jesus was born. ch.3 p.7
Jews taught to fast, do alms, make prayer, and go on pilgrimage. ch.89 p.207
Jubilee is now every 100 years. ch.83 p.191-193
Kings’ barons. ch.131 p.301
You desire horses like knights. ch.69 p.159
The burden of the republic. ch.69 p.161
Courtiers. ch.133 p.307
After the nightly prayer. ch.131 p.299
Pinnacle where the scribes used to preach. ch.127 p.291, ch.129 p.297, ch.12 p.19
Prodigal son, new [leg] hose. ch.147 p.241
God is not composite. ch.161 p.377
Man is composite. ch.168 p.389
Lazarus and his two sisters were proprietors in other towns of Magdala and Bethany, just like in the Middle Ages! ch.194 p.433
Jesus (really Judas) was dressed as a juggler. ch.217 p.475
Fistula (A medical term not used until the Middle Ages for a drainage opening made in the body) ch.120 p.275
Jesus could not read at age 12. ch.9 p.15
Do penance. ch.121 p.277
Jesus made prayer in union with the messenger of God and heard Mohammed’s voice. ch.84 p.195

These “more than a few” errors prove that the book was written during the Middle Ages in Europe.

Clues on Who Wrote This Forgery

An Italian printer named Arrivabene in 1547 published the first Italian translation of the Koran. The writer of the Gospel of Barnabas was not well versed in Biblical history nor in orthodox Muslim theology, but apparently he (or she) was very knowledgeable of European Medieval customs. The Italian of the Gospel of Barnabas had evidence of both Venetian and Tuscan dialects. Latin spellings showing Latin Vulgate influence. There are also influences from Dante’s works.

There were Arabic notes in the margin. However, as David Sox (p.51) mentions, they were not written by an orthodox Muslim. The Raggs conjecture that since the dark green, oriental-type binding is very similar to the binding of a Turkish document of 1575 in the Venetian archives, the binding and marginal notes could both have been done in Constantinople.

First Suspect: Fra Marino was the father inquisitor of Venice from 1542 to 1550, and perhaps his motive was revenge (Sox p.68). Felice Peretti (the future Pope Sixtus V) was a severe, devoted inquisitor of Venice who made many enemies. In the sixteenth century there were 843 trials for Protestantism and Anabaptism, 65 for blasphemous speech and 148 for sorcery in Venice alone (Sox p.57). In the 1530’s Venice was criticized for its tolerance. An Augustinian friar was punished for teaching heresy at the Church of St. Barnabas in Venice (Sox p.59). A handwriting analysis of Fra Marino’s handwriting and the Gospel of Barnabas show they could have come from the same person according to David Sox p.70.

Second Suspect: Anselmo Turmeda (who later became Abd-Allah ibn Abd Allah) from Majorca, Spain, studied in Bologna for ten years. In his biography, written 1383-1390, he claimed to be a priest before his conversion to Islam. His teacher at Bologna was a crypto-Muslim. De Epalza (p.63-64) says he was a converted Franciscan who took revenge on Christianity after his conversion to Islam. The mention of Spanish coins in the Gospel of Barnabas supports this theory.

Other Suspects: Other Gospel forgeries, these at least written by Moors in Arabic, are from Grenada. None was known prior to 1588 though.

Conclusion

Imagine you were a Muslim who was told that someone found a lost “book” from God. Among other things, this “Sura” mentioned that Mohammed sailed on a boat to Mecca, and this Sura contradicted the teaching of the Bible and contradicted the Qur’an on ten points. The oldest manuscript of the alleged Sura was written in Italian, which is both not a Mideastern language and did not even exist in the time of Mohammed. Finally, this supposed Sura had some historical customs which did not occur until 1,000 years later in Europe.

It is safe to say a Muslims would probably have a few questions, to say the least. Before you embrace this medieval forgery as an authentic work that shows the “real” teachings of Jesus, remember that this work contradicts the Qur’an, too.

Suggested Reading

Geisler, Norman and Abdul Saleeb. Answering Islam. (Baker Books) 1993.

Gilchrist, John. Origins and Sources of the Gospel of Barnabas (Jesus to the Muslims) 1979.

Ragg, Lonsdale and Laura (translators). The Gospel of Barnabas. Bakhtyar Printers, Lahore, Pak., 1981

Part 5 – Does John 14_16-20 refer to Mohammad

Muslims appeal to verses like John 14:16-20, where Jesus says, “And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper..”Most Muslims quote only the first half of this verse, and then shut the Bible! If Jesus stopped at this point, one could speculate about the identity of this Helper. But Jesus clearly identifies Him by continuing, “that He (the Helper) may abide with you forever – the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him; but you know Him, for He dwells with you and will be in you.” From the earliest centuries of Islam, Muslim scholars have endeavoured to prove that this Helper was Muhammad, the prophet of Islam. It is argued that the Greek word paracletos, which is translated ‘Helper,’ should be pareklutosor ‘praised one,’ meaning Ahmad or Muhammad. This is proof, they say, that the Biblical text has been changed! However, any knowledgeable
scholar in the field will tell you that there is no evidence at all for this ‘corruption.’ All of the Greek manuscripts in existence, which predate Muhammad, say parakletos, not paraklutos. There are more than 70 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament in existence today, dating from before the time of Muhammad, and not one of them uses the word paraklutos! All use the word parakletos. In fact the word paraklutos does not appear anywhere in the Bible!

Let us look at the specific details of the arrival and identity of this parakletos, ‘Helper,’ and see if they fit Muhammad:

1) He will give you another Helper
Even if, as Muslims claim, the original word was Paraklutos, the sentence would read, “He will give you another praised one.” It makes no sense and is completely out of context. What
Jesus is saying here is this, ‘I have been your Helper, Counselor, Comforter. I still have many things to teach you, but I will send you another Helper like me.’

2) He will give you another Helper – The Spirit of Truth
The one obvious fact that emerges is that the Helper is a Spirit. Has Muhammad ever been called the Spirit of Truth?

3) He will abide with you forever
In no sense was Muhammad ever with Jesus’ disciples, let alone permanently. Muhammad was born in the 7th century after Christ. He lived only 62 years and then died. He did not live with
his companions forever, did he? His body was buried in Medina. But Jesus said that the promised Helper would be with His disciples forever. The one referred to cannot possibly be
Muhammad.

4) The Spirit of Truth whom the world cannot see
According to this prophecy, the world cannot receive the Helper because it can’t see Him. Thousands of people saw Muhammad during his lifetime, for he was visible. The invisible Helper
cannot be the visible Muhammad.

5) You know Him for He dwells with you
Jesus is clearly talking about someone with whom the disciples were familiar. Was Muhammad known to them? Of course not. He was born more than five hundred years later.

6) He dwells in you
The Helper was to be in the disciples. How could the Helper be Muhammad? Muhammad was a flesh and blood person who is no longer alive. Muhammad is not in Jesus’ followers and never will
be.

What can we conclude? Was Muhammad alive at the time of Jesus’ apostles? No. Was Muhammad ever called the ‘Spirit of Truth’? No.

Did Muhammad live with the apostles forever? No.

Did Muhammad live inside the apostles? No.

This prophesy cannot be a reference to Muhammad. Who is it about? The Bible states the truth in the following verses. “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you.” (John 14:26). It is certain, then, that the Helper is the Holy Spirit (Ruh Al-Kudus) of God.
The fulfilment of this prophecy occurred within a matter of days.Only fifty days after the resurrection of Jesus, the disciples received the Helper on the day of Pentecost. Jesus had told them to wait in Jerusalem until the Holy Spirit, the Helper, should come (Acts 1.4-8). The Holy Spirit came upon them while they were all together, praying in the city. “They were all filled with the Holy Spirit” (Acts 2.3-4). The Holy Spirit was with the disciples in the person of Jesus while Jesus was still on earth, and the Holy Spirit was in the disciples’ hearts from the day of Pentecost and forever.

The Helper is indeed the Holy Spirit of the living God. We all need Him to open our eyes so that we can see who Jesus is and what He has done for sinners like us. The Helper is only given to those who believe the Gospel; that Jesus died for our sins and rose again. This is what makes someone a Christian. Only those who believe receive the Helper. You can receive
the Holy Spirit today by genuinely inviting Jesus into your life and receiving Him as your Saviour.

Having examined the context, it is evident that John 14:16-20 has nothing to do with Muhammad!

Conclusion
All of these verses, (and others that Muslims refer to), can be understood with a little study and consideration of the context. Those who apply these passages to Muhammad demonstrate that they have only a superficial understanding of the Bible. The truth is available for anyone who is willing to examine it. Searching for the truth requires effort, yet it can be done. As Jesus said, “You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32).

Part 4 – Does Isaiah 42 refer to Mohammad

Muslims claim that the servant Isaiah 42:1 mentioned is “Ahmad” which is Muhammad, “the false prophet”.

Let’s set the record straight.

First of all, Isaiah is a prophet whom the Qur’an NEVER mentioned by name, so how do Muslims actually know that he was one of the prophets since they also cling to the claim that the Bible is corrupt? According to Qur’an 2:79; they are subjected to eternal damnation for assuming things that Allah did not reveal, if Isaiah was not a prophet, by suggesting that Isaiah 42 is from Allah.

Secondly, Isaiah was a prophet that explicitly prophesied the most about the coming Messiah. He talked about His virgin birth (Isaiah 7:14); His Deity – Immanuel, which means God with us (Isaiah 7:14), that He is Might God (Isaiah 9:6-7); and His sacrificial death (Isaiah 53); which Islam completely denies.

So, how could this prophet (Isaiah) prophecy about a ‘supposed’ coming prophet (Muhammad), who would deny most of his prophecies; is beyond me!

Of course, Muslims have the answer which is, “Oh, all of his other prophecies are corrupted but this chapter 42 is definitely talking about Muhammad”. It amazes me how Muslims can’t even realize how inconsistent, ridiculous and asinine they sound sometimes.

Jesus said that He came to fulfil the law and the prophets (Matthew 5:17); thus we expect Him to fulfil Isaiah 42 if, indeed, He was telling the truth. So let’s see if Isaiah 42 if fulfilled in Him (Jesus):

Isaiah 42:1-4,

1 Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles. 2 He shall not cry, nor lift up, nor cause his voice to be heard in the street. 3 A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench: he shall bring forth judgment unto truth. 4 He shall not fail nor be discouraged, till he have set judgment in the earth: and the isles shall wait for his law.

After Jesus healed a man on a Sabbath Day, the Pharisees conspired to kill Him but knowing what they planned to do to Him; Jesus didn’t confront them but rather simply left. When that happened, Matthew, quoting Isaiah 42:1-4, records:

14 Then the Pharisees went out, and held a council against him, how they might destroy him. 15 Jesus, perceiving that, withdrew from there. Great multitudes followed him; and he healed them all, 16 and commanded them that they should not make him known: 17 that it might BE FULFILLED which was spoken through ISAIAH THE PROPHET, saying, 18 “Behold, my servant whom I have chosen my beloved in whom my soul is well pleased: I will put my Spirit on him. He will proclaim justice to the nations. 19 He will not strive, nor shout; neither will anyone hear his voice in the streets. 20 He won’t break a bruised reed. He won’t quench smoking flax, until he leads justice to victory. 21 In his name, the nations will hope.” – Matthew 12:14-21

Peter re-echoed this in his epistle,

22 Who (Jesus) did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth: 23 Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously – 1Peter 2:22-23

A similar verse as Isaiah 42 is Isaiah 61 which was also fulfilled by Jesus in Luke 4:16-21,

16 And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the Sabbath day, and stood up for to read. 17 And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written, 18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, 19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord. 20 And he closed the book, and he gave it again to the minister, and sat down. And the eyes of all them that were in the synagogue were fastened on him. 21 And he began to say unto them, this day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears. – Luke 4:16-21

Did Muhammad keep quite when people stood against him? I don’t think so; he killed anyone standing on his way.

In the same Isaiah 42, God said His name is Yahweh (Isaiah 42:8), which Muhammad NEVER mentioned, why is that?

As we see, Isaiah 42 was fulfilled by Jesus already, so it is impossible that Muhammad came to fulfil it. Muhammad denied some of Isaiah’s prophecies, namely the Deity of Christ and His sacrificial death as mentioned above. Therefore, he was a false prophet and Muslims are condemned by their god for believing something that didn’t come from him.

Jesus called Himself, the Seal of prophets – the Last to come:

Do not work for the food that disappears, but for the food that remains to eternal life – the food which the Son of Man will give to you. For God the Father has put HIS SEAL OF APPROVAL on him.” – John 6:27

A parable about Him being the last to come,

1 He began to speak to them in parables. “A man planted a vineyard, put a hedge around it, dug a pit for the wine press, built a tower, rented it out to a farmer, and went into another country. 2 When it was time, he sent a servant to the farmer to get from the farmer his share of the fruit of the vineyard. 3 They took him, beat him, and sent him away empty. 4 Again, he sent another servant to them; and they threw stones at him, wounded him in the head, and sent him away shamefully treated. 5 Again he sent another; and they killed him; and many others, beating some, and killing some. 6 Therefore STILL HAVING ONE, HIS BELOVED SON, HE SENT HIM LAST to them, saying, ‘They will respect my son.’ 7 But those farmers said among themselves, ‘This is the heir. Come, let’s kill him, and the inheritance will be ours.’ 8 They took him, killed him, and cast him out of the vineyard.– Mark 12:1-8

The servants that were sent before the Son (Jesus) were the prophets. Jesus is the Son of God whom He sent last. No wonder the book of revelation records:

18 I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book, IF ANYONE ADDS to them, may God add to him the plagues which are written in this book. 19 IF ANYONE TAKES AWAY from the words of the book of this prophecy, may God take away his part from the tree of life, and out of the holy city, which are written in this book. – Revelation 22:18-19

Muhammad is a false prophet; he can never be the servant of God mentioned by Isaiah. He denied Jesus as the Son of God and God as Father. The Bible calls that type of person an antichrist and liar:

Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the Antichrist, HE WHO DENIES the Father and the Son. – 1 John 2:22

Come to Christ O Muslims, you can’t win against the truth.

The Bible Uses a Third Person Omniscient Point of View

Points of view in Scripture

Clear examples of various points of view in Scripture:

Omniscient Point of View:

Genesis, the entire book (although the amount of intrusive narration is quite limited). Exodus, the entire book (again, however, intrusive narration is limited).

Numbers, chapters 11, 12, & 22 – 25.

Ruth, the entire book, with almost no intrusive narrator. I & II Samuel

I & II Kings

I & II Chronicles

Matthew

Mark

Third-person, limited omniscience, major character Point of View:

Leviticus (the entire book is in 3rd person, but only 8:1 – 10:20 is narrative, from the perspective of Moses, in the 3rd person).

Numbers (the entire book is in 3rd person, but 7:1 – 10:36 & 13:1 – 21:35 are limited to

Moses’ point of view).

Deuteronomy (the entire book gives us Moses’ perspective on the exodus from Egypt and journey to the edge of Canaan, only the final chapter, which tells of the death and burial of Moses, is in the omniscient p.o.v.)

John (the entire book, except for 1:14-18).

Third-person, limited omniscience, minor character Point of View:

Luke – a “reporter’s voice” and Acts 1:1 – 19:41.

First-person major character Point of View:

Ezra chapters 7:27 – 9:15 are in the 1st person point of view. Nehemiah – a entire book in the 1st person point of view. Ecclesiastes – the entire book.

Isaiah chapter 6 (the only chapter in the whole book in the 1st person p.o.v). Jeremiah 1:4 – 7:30; 11:5b – 19:13; 24: 1 – 10; 25: 15 – 38 & 31:26 – 32:15. Ezekiel, the entire book.

Daniel 7:2 – the end of the book (12:13). Habakkuk – the entire book.

Zechariah 1:8 through the end of the book. Revelation 1:9 – 22:18 are in the 1st person p.o.v).

First-person (plural!) minor character:

Acts 20:1 – the end of the book (28:31).  Luke’s account of his journeys with Paul.

Objective/Dramatic:

Joshua (only momentary slips out of the dramatic p.o.v., as in 4:9, 14; 5:1-12; 10:2, etc.) Judges (again, only momentary omniscient commentary punctuates this narrative, mostly

during the transitions from one narrative to another).

Job

Song of Solomon

Malachi (a dramatic dialogue between God and the people of Israel).

Source https://www.academia.edu/7110697/POV_in_the_Bible

Part 4 – Does John 14:16-20 refer to Mohammad?

Muslims appeal to verses like John 14:16-20, where Jesus says, “And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper..”Most Muslims quote only the first half of this verse,
and then shut the Bible! If Jesus stopped at this point, one could speculate about the identity of this Helper. But Jesus clearly identifies Him by continuing, “that He (the Helper) may abide with you forever – the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him; but you know Him, for He dwells with you and will be in you.”
From the earliest centuries of Islam, Muslim scholars have endeavoured to prove that this Helper was Muhammad, the prophet of Islam. It is argued that the Greek word paracletos, which
is translated ‘Helper,’ should be pareklutosor ‘praised one,’ meaning Ahmad or Muhammad. This is proof, they say, that the Biblical text has been changed! However, any knowledgeable
scholar in the field will tell you that there is no evidence at all for this ‘corruption.’ All of the Greek manuscripts in existence, which predate Muhammad, say parakletos, not paraklutos. There are more than 70 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament in existence today, dating from before the time of Muhammad, and not one of them uses the word paraklutos! All use the word parakletos. In fact the word paraklutos does not appear anywhere in the Bible!

Let us look at the specific details of the arrival and identity of this parakletos, ‘Helper,’ and see if they fit Muhammad:

1) He will give you another Helper
Even if, as Muslims claim, the original word was Paraklutos, the sentence would read, “He will give you another praised one.” It makes no sense and is completely out of context. What
Jesus is saying here is this, ‘I have been your Helper, Counselor, Comforter. I still have many things to teach you, but I will send you another Helper like me.’

2) He will give you another Helper – The Spirit of Truth
The one obvious fact that emerges is that the Helper is a Spirit. Has Muhammad ever been called the Spirit of Truth?

3) He will abide with you forever
In no sense was Muhammad ever with Jesus’ disciples, let alone permanently. Muhammad was born in the 7th century after Christ. He lived only 62 years and then died. He did not live with
his companions forever, did he? His body was buried in Medina. But Jesus said that the promised Helper would be with His disciples forever. The one referred to cannot possibly be
Muhammad.

4) The Spirit of Truth whom the world cannot see
According to this prophecy, the world cannot receive the Helper because it can’t see Him. Thousands of people saw Muhammad during his lifetime, for he was visible. The invisible Helper
cannot be the visible Muhammad.

5) You know Him for He dwells with you
Jesus is clearly talking about someone with whom the disciples were familiar. Was Muhammad known to them? Of course not. He was born more than five hundred years later.

6) He dwells in you
The Helper was to be in the disciples. How could the Helper be Muhammad? Muhammad was a flesh and blood person who is no longer alive. Muhammad is not in Jesus’ followers and never will
be.

What can we conclude? Was Muhammad alive at the time of Jesus’ apostles? No. Was Muhammad ever called the ‘Spirit of Truth’? No. Did Muhammad live with the apostles forever? No. Did
Muhammad live inside the apostles? No. This prophesy cannot be a reference to Muhammad. Who is it about? The Bible states the truth in the following verses. “But the Helper, the Holy
Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you.” (John 14:26). It is certain, then, that the Helper is the Holy Spirit (Ruh Al-Kudus) of God.
The fulfilment of this prophecy occurred within a matter of days.Only fifty days after the resurrection of Jesus, the disciples received the Helper on the day of Pentecost. Jesus had told them to wait in Jerusalem until the Holy Spirit, the Helper, should come (Acts 1.4-8). The Holy Spirit came upon them while they were all together, praying in the city. “They were all filled with the Holy Spirit” (Acts 2.3-4). The Holy Spirit was with the disciples in the person of Jesus while Jesus was still on earth, and the Holy Spirit was in the disciples’ hearts from the day of Pentecost and forever.

The Helper is indeed the Holy Spirit of the living God. We all need Him to open our eyes so that we can see who Jesus is and what He has done for sinners like us. The Helper is only given to those who believe the Gospel; that Jesus died for our sins and rose again. This is what makes someone a Christian. Only those who believe receive the Helper. You can receive
the Holy Spirit today by genuinely inviting Jesus into your life and receiving Him as your Saviour.

Having examined the context, it is evident that John 14:16-20 has nothing to do with Muhammad!

Conclusion
All of these verses, (and others that Muslims refer to), can be understood with a little study and consideration of the context. Those who apply these passages to Muhammad demonstrate that they have only a superficial understanding of the Bible. The truth is available for anyone who is willing to examine it. Searching for the truth requires effort, yet it can be done. As Jesus said, “You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32).

Part 3 – Does Song of Solomon 5:16 refer to Mohammad?

His mouth is full of sweetness. And he is wholly desirable. This is my beloved and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem,” (Song of Solomon 5:16).

Muslim Arguments The word translated here “wholly desirable” is the word “machamadim.” The word sounds a lot like “Muhammad,” though it is in the plural form. Some Muslims argue that this should be understood as the name Muhammad.
They contend that the small differences in pronunciation are irrelevant and that it is in the plural form as a sign of respect. Therefore, they say, this is a plain prophecy of Muhammad. Jews and Christians translate it as “wholly desirable” or “altogether lovely” to hide this clear reference to the Muslim prophet. “His mouth is full of sweetness” is said to be a reference to the giving of the Quran.

Christian Response To any Christian remotely familiar with Song of Solomon, the first appropriate response to this argument is honestly a hearty laugh. This is obviously a love song between Solomon and his bride, and to put Muhammad in the place of the bride’s beloved turns the book into nonsense. The context is clearly about the passionate love of a marriage and is sometimes rather descriptive. It could not possibly be about some future prophet bringing a new book.

Additionally, the argument hinges on the idea that, in the original Hebrew, the personal name of Muhammad is there. It plainly is not. The Hebrew word “machmad” means “desirable” or when used as a noun, “desirable thing” or “lovely thing.” The plural form used here, “machamadim,” is an emphatic form and so is translated “wholly desirable” or “altogether lovely.” The fact that it sounds kind of like a name in another language from a different time period is obviously irrelevant to the meaning of the word.

This word is used throughout the Old Testament. It is not a unique word. If the word secretly means the personal name “Muhammad,” then in places like Hosea 9:16 where God pronounces judgment on Ephraim and promises to slay even “your beloved” (machamadim) we should read this as a promise by God that He would slay Muhammad in judgment, right? No Muslim would want to say that, of course. And they don’t need to because the word quite obviously doesn’t mean Muhammad. If it
did, why would ancient translations from before the time of Muhammad
consistently translate it just as we do today? They would have no reason to try and hide Muhammad’s name when the man had not yet even been born and so obviously could not yet be rejected by any of them. The Greek Septuagint translation of Song of Solomon was completed sometime around the first century B.C., hundreds of years before Muhammad. It reads: “he is altogether an object of desire.” The old Latin text of the 5th century AD, still well before Muhammad, reads: “he is all lovely.”

The translation here is not controversial. No one is hiding anything. An eager bride finds her husband-to-be wholly desirable. She does not consider her future husband to actually be a prophet who will come a thousand years after she is dead. Since there is no personal name “Muhammad” in this text, there is absolutely no reason to think that this passage has anything to do with the
future Muslim leader.

Much more could be said, as this argument is so absurd. It is worth at least pointing out lastly that the same chapter in which these Muslims attempt to show that the beloved groom of Song of Solomon is actually Muhammad opens with this beloved groom drinking wine with his milk and urging all his friends to imbibe with him. As Islam strictly forbids alcohol, it is clear that this beloved groom not only isn’t Muhammad but does not even share the moral convictions that Muhammad would later promote. He urges people to do what Muhammad would call a
sin. Thus, on every level, this argument simply doesn’t hold water.

Having examined the context, it is evident that Song of Solomon 5:16 has nothing to do with Muhammad!